Z.-P. Zhan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 3859–3862
3861
of samarium triiodide as a Lewis acid for conjugate
addition of indoles to electron-deficient olefins. Herein,
we report the remarkable catalytic activity of samarium
triiodide in this Michael reaction (Scheme 1).
3. (a) Joule, J. A. In Science of Synthesis; Thomas, E. J., Ed.;
Thieme: Stuttgart, 2000; Vol. 10, pp 361–652; (b) Gribble,
G. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1045–1075; (c)
Moore, R. E.; Cheuk, C.; Yang, X. Q.; Patterson, G. M. L.;
Bonjouklian, R.; SmitKa, T. A.; Mynderse, J. S.; Foster, R.
S.; Jones, N. D.; Swartzendruber, J. K.; Deeter, J. B.
J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1036–1043; (d) Garnick, R. L.;
Levery, S. B.; Lequesne, P. W. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43,
1226–1229; (e) Moore, R. E.; Cheuk, C.; Patterson, G. M.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6456–6457.
4. (a) Szmuszkovicz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 79, 2819–
2821; (b) Noland, W. E.; Christensen, G. M.; Sauer, G. L.;
Dutton, G. G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 456–457; (c)
Iqbal, Z.; Jackson, A. H.; Rao, K. R. N. Tetrahedron Lett.
First, we carried out the reaction of indole with methyl
vinyl ketone in the presence of catalytic amount of SmI3
(
10 mol%) in acetonitrile and obtained the correspond-
ing 3-alkylated indole (product a, Table 1) in 95% yield.
Then, various a,b-unsaturated compounds were reacted
with indole, 2-methylindole, and 2-phenylindole to give
the corresponding 3-alkylated products in high yields.
8
The results are summarized in Table 1. Electron-defi-
1
988, 29, 2577–2580.
. (a) Harrington, P. E.; Kerr, M. A. Synlett 1996, 1047–1048;
b) Harrington, P.; Kerr, M. A. Can. J. Chem. 1998, 76,
256–1265; (c) Loh, T. P.; Wei, L. L. Synlett 1998, 975–976;
d) Loh, T. P.; Pei, J.; Lin, M. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2315–
316; (e) Yadav, J. S.; Abraham, S.; Reddy, B. V. S.;
cient olefins, such as methyl vinyl ketone, chalcone,
benzalacetone, cyclohexenone, and dibenzylidene ace-
tone, afforded the products in good to excellent yields.
The treatment of b-nitrostyrene with indole produced
the corresponding 3-alkylated indole in 92–95% yields
5
(
1
(
2
(
tained via InCl -catalyzed reaction, SmI was more
entries 12, 13). In comparison with 78% of product ob-
5
Sabitha, G. Synthesis 2001, 2165–2169; (f) Bandini, M.;
Cozzi, P. G.; Giacomini, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Selva, S.;
Umani-Ronchi, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3700–3704; (g)
Arcadi, A.; Bianchi, G.; Chiarini, M.; Anniballe, G.;
Marinelli, F. Synlett 2004, 6, 944–950; (h) Ji, S.-J.; Wang,
S.-Y. Synlett 2003, 13, 2074–2076.
e
3
3
efficient for the Michael addition of indole to b-nitrost-
yrene. Though 2-phenylindole was more hindered, its 3-
position alkylation was proceeded in good to excellent
yields (entries 3, 10, 11). The reactions were clean and
the products were obtained in high yields without the
formation of any side products such as N-alkylation
product. This important result provided a remarkable
contrast to similar reactions under palladium catalysis,
6
. (a) Evans, D. A.; Wu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
0162–10163; (b) Kobayashi, S.; Hamada, T.; Nagayama,
1
S.; Manabe, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 165–167; (c) Sibi, M. P.;
Manyem, S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2929–2932; (d) Qian, C.-T.;
Wang, L.-C. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7193–7197.
9
where N-alkylation was predominant. Furthermore,
7. (a) Krief, A.; Laval, A. M. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 745–777;
(b) Molander, G. A. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 29–68; (c)
Molander, G. A.; Harris, C. R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 307–
the indole nitrogen did not require prior protection
and the avoidance of strong bases for deprotection per-
mitted compatibility with a wide range of functional
groups. The procedure did not require any acidic pro-
moters or inert atmospheric condition.
3
2
38; (d) Steel, P. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001,
727–2751.
8
. Typical experimental procedure: a mixture of indole
(
(
(
1 mmol) or 2-methylindole (1 mmol) or 2-phenylindole
1 mmol), electron-deficient olefin (1 mmol) and SmI
0.1 mmol) in CH CN (1 mL) was stirred at reflux condi-
3
In conclusion, samarium triiodide has been found to be
a superior Lewis acid for the alkylation of indoles with
electron-deficient olefins.
3
tion. After completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC,
the resulting mixture was diluted with H O (10 mL) and
2
extracted with EtOAc (15 mL · 3). The combined organic
layer was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous
Acknowledgement
2 4
Na SO . After removal of the solvent under reduced
pressure, the crude product was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel (eluant: EtOAc: Petroleum
ether = 1:6) to afford the corresponding 3-alkylated indole.
The financial support is provided by FuJian Provincial
Department of Science and Technology (2003J019).
1
All new compounds were fully characterized by H NMR,
C NMR, MS, IR and elemental analysis.
1
3
3
-(1-benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one(f): 311
À1
1
References and notes
mg (75%). IR (film) tmax: 3034, 1680, 1598, 1493 cm ; H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ) d = 3.72 (dd, J = 7, 16.5 Hz, 1 H),
3
1
. (a) Aubry, C.; Patel, A.; Mahale, S.; Chaudhuri, B.;
Marechal, J.-D.; Sutcliffe, M. J.; Jenkins, P. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 1423–1425; (b) Marugan, J. J.; Manthey, C.;
Anaclerio, B.; Lafrance, L.; Lu, T.; Markotan, T.; Leonard,
K. A.; Crysler, C.; Eisennagel, S.; Dasgupta, M.; Tomczuk,
B. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 926–934; (c) Fukuyama, T.;
Chen, X.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3125–3126; (d)
Vaillancourt, V.; Albizati, K. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
3.81 (dd, J = 7, 16.5 Hz, 1H), 5.09 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (s,
2H), 6.90–7.07 (m, 4H), 7.10–7.21 (m, 3H), 7.23–7.30 (m,
5H), 7.33–7.47 (m, 5H), 7.50–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.88–7.93 (m,
1
3
3
2H); C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ) d = 38.3, 45.3, 49.9,
109.7, 118.4, 119.1, 119.8, 121.9, 125.6, 126.3, 126.6, 127.3,
127.5, 127.8, 128.1, 128.4, 128.5, 128.7, 132.9, 137.0, 137.2,
+
137.6, 144.3, 198.6; ESI-MS: m/z (%) = 416 (88) [M+H ],
+
438 (100) [M+Na ]; Anal. Calcd for C30
H25NO: C, 86.72;
1
15, 3499–3502.
H, 6.06; N, 3.37. Found: C, 86.84; H, 6.05; N, 3.43.
3-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-nitro ethyl)-1H-indole(m): 272
mg (92%). IR (film) tmax: 3412, 3058, 1610, 1548, 1509,
2
. (a) Zhang, H.-C.; Ye, H.; Moretto, A. F.; Brumfield, K. K.;
Maryanoff, B. E. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 89–92; (b) Faul, M. M.;
Winneroski, L. L.; Krumrich, C. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
À1
1
3
1373 cm ; H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ) d = 3.79 (s, 3H),
6
053–6058; (c) Bennasar, M.-L.; Vidal, B.; Bosch, J. J. Org.
4.91 (dd, J = 7.5, 12.5 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (dd, J = 7.5, 12.5 Hz,
1H), 5.15 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.03
(s, 1H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H),
7.26 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d,
Chem. 1997, 62, 3597–3609; (d) Tani, M.; Matsumoto, S.;
Aida, Y.; Arikawa, S.; Nakane, A.; Yokoyama, Y.;
Murakami, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 443–453.