764
B. Movassagh – S. Shokri · An Efficient One-Pot Conversion of THP- and TMS Ethers
Table 1. Deprotection-sulfonylation of n-butylOTHP using
various clay catalysts.
fonate esters prepared from methanesulfonyl chloride
(entries 11 – 13, Table 2, and entries 10 – 12, Table 3)
need shorter reaction times and generally give higher
yields than those produced from arylsulfonyl chlorides.
Clay catalyst
Time (h)
Yielda (%)
Montmorillonite K-10
Montmorillonite KSF
Fe3+-Montmorillonite K-10
FeCl3-Montmorillonite K-10
24
24
24
7
25
20
57
81
Conclusion
a
Isolated yields.
A simple, and efficient method has been developed
for one-step deprotection-sulfonylationof a wide range
of THP and TMS ethers by using an inexpensive, non-
hazardous, and easily available catalyst. The present
protocol has the additional advantages of easy work-
up and high yield.
Table 2. Preparation of sulfonate esters from THP ethers us-
ing FeCl3-Mont. K-10.
Entry
THP
ether
Sulfonyl
chloride
Time Yielda Ref.b
(h) (%)
1
CH3CH2OTHP
p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
6
7
7
7
8
8
75 [10]
81 [11]
79 [10]
2 CH3(CH2)2CH2OTHP p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
3 CH3(CH2)3CH2OTHP p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
4 CH3(CH2)6CH2OTHP p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
5
6
7
8
9
80
[1]
Experimental Section
PhCH2OTHP
CH2=CHCH2OTHP p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
CyclohexylOTHP p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl 11
(CH3)2CHOTHP p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl 10
D,L-CH3(CH2)5- p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl 11
CH(CH3)OTHP
p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
70 [12]
72 [10]
78 [10]
70 [10]
68 [10]
FeCl3-Montmorillonite K-10 catalyst was prepared ac-
cording to the method reported by Laszlo et al. [9]. All prod-
ucts were characterized by comparison of their spectroscopic
data with those of known samples. IR spectra were obtained
using a Shimadzu 470 instrument. 1H NMR spectra were de-
termined by a Bruker AQS Avance 300 MHz spectrometer.
10
11
CyclohexylOTHP
CyclohexylOTHP
C6H5SO2Cl
CH3SO2Cl
CH3SO2Cl
CH3SO2Cl
8
3
2
2
77 [10]
88 [10]
86 [11]
83 [13]
12 CH3(CH2)2CH2OTHP
13 CH3CH2CH2OTHP
General procedure for the conversion of THP ethers into
their corresponding sulfonate esters
a
Yields refer to pure isolated products characterized by IR and
1H NMR spectroscopy; b references for known compounds.
To a stirred suspension of the THP ether (1.0 mmol),
dry acetonitrile (6 ml), and FeCl3-Montmorillonite K-10
(250 mg, containing 0.038 mmol of FeCl3), the sulfonyl
chloride (1.0 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was
heated at reflux for the time specified in Table 2. Progress
of the reaction was monitored by TLC; on completion, after
cooling, the catalyst was removed by filtration and the filtrate
was evaporated. The resulting crude product was purified
and isolated by preparative TLC (silica gel, eluent petroleum
ether : ethyl acetate = 50 : 1) to afford the desired ester.
Table 3. Preparation of sulfonate esters from TMS ethers us-
ing FeCl3-Mont. K-10.
a
Entry
TMS ether
Sulfonyl chloride Time Yield
(h) (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CH3(CH2)2CH2OTMS p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
CH3(CH2)3CH2OTMS p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
CH3(CH2)6CH2OTMS p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
5
6
6
7
6
78
75
80
72
75
80
77
71
82
87
85
85
PhCH2OTMS
CH2=CHCH2OTMS
CyclohexylOTMS
(CH3)2CHOTMS
p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl 10
p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl
9
CH3(CH2)5CH(CH3)OTMS p-CH3C6H4SO2Cl 11
General procedure for the conversion of TMS ethers into
their corresponding sulfonate esters
CyclohexylOTMS
CyclohexylOTMS
CH3(CH2)2CH2OTMS
CH3CH2CH2OTMS
C6H5SO2Cl
CH3SO2Cl
CH3SO2Cl
CH3SO2Cl
7
3
3
3
10
11
12
To a solution of the TMS ether (1.0 mmol) in dry ace-
tonitrile (6 ml) was added FeCl3-Montmorillonite K-10 clay
(250 mg, containing 0.038 mmol of FeCl3). The mixture was
refluxed for the appropriate time (Table 3) and cooled. Af-
ter filtration, the filtrate was concentrated and the product
purified and isolated by preparative TLC (silica gel, eluent
petroleum ether : EtOAc = 50 : 1).
a
Isolated yields.
ethers were treated with p-toluenesulfonyl, benzene-
sulfonyl, and methanesulfonyl chloride in the presence
of the catalyst in refluxing acetonitrile to obtain the
corresponding sulfonate esters in good to high yields
(Table 2). The catalyst, FeCl3-Mont. K-10 clay, is also
efficient for the preparation of sulfonate esters from
TMS ethers (Table 3). It is worth noting that in both
reactions carbon-carbon double bonds remains unaf-
Acknowledgements
The authors thank K. N. Toosi University of Technology
Research Council and Kermanshah Oil Refining Company
fected (entry 6, Table 2, and entry 5, Table 3). Sul- for financial assistance.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 7/8/19 6:38 AM