Communications
ing a link between experimental and theoretical studies on the
triple-helical collagen structure.
Schreier, W. Zinth, L. Moroder, C. Renner, Chem. Eur. J. 2006,
2, 1114 – 1120.
9] a) L. E. Bretscher, C. L. Jenkins, K. M. Taylor, M. L. DeRider,
R. T. Raines, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 777 – 778; b) D. Barth,
O. Kyrieleis, S. Franke, C. Renner, L. Moroder, Chem. Eur. J.
1
[
Received: April 11, 2006
Revised: August 9, 2006
Published online: September 28, 2006
2003, 9, 3703 – 3714.
[
10] a) A. V. Persikov, J. A. M. Ramshaw, A. Kirkpatrick, B. Brodsky,
Biochemistry 2000, 39, 14960 – 14967; b) A. V. Persikov, J. A. M.
Ramshaw, B. Brodsky, J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 19343 – 19349.
11] a) N. Panasik, E. S. Eberhardt, A. S. Edison, D. R. Powell, R. T.
Raines, Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1994, 44, 262 – 269; b) M. L.
DeRider, S. J. Wilkens, M. J. Waddell, L. E. Bretscher, F.
Weinhold, R. T. Raines, J. L. Markley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
Keywords: collagen · folding/unfolding · peptides ·
.
photoswitches · triple helix
[
[
1] a) R. D. B. Fraser, T. P. MacRay, E. Suzuki, J. Mol. Biol. 1979,
129, 463 – 481; b) P. L. Privalov,Adv. Protein Chem. 1982, 35, 1 –
124, 2497 – 2505; c) C. L. Jenkins, L. E. Bretscher, R. T. Raines,
104; c) K. Beck, B. Brodsky, J. Struct. Biol. 1998, 122, 17 – 29;
Biochemistry 2001, 40, 8658 – 8658.
d) H. P. Bächinger, J. Engel inProtein Folding Handbook, Part I
Eds.: J. Buchner, T. Kiefhaber), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005,
[
12] Y. Feng, G. Melacini, J. P. Taulane, M. Goodman, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 10351 – 10358.
13] S. P. Boudko, J. Engel, J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 335, 1289 – 1297.
14] Rpn denotes the ratio of the positive maximum intensity over
the negative maximum intensity and is used as index of triple-
helical fold and stability (see also ref. [12]).
(
pp. 1059 – 1109.
[
[
[
2] a) J. Engel, H. T. Chen, D. J. Prockop, H. Klump, Biopolymers
1977, 16, 601 – 622; b) E. S. Eberhardt, N. Panasik, R. T. Raines,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12261 – 12266; c) L. Vitagliano, R.
Berisio, L. Mazzarella, A. Zagari, Biopolymers 2001, 59, 459 –
[
15] The chemical shifts of the folded labeled glycine residues are d =
464.
7
.691, 7.653, and 7.574 ppm at 278C and the temperature shifts
[
3] a) K. Okuyama, N. Tanaka, T. Ashida, M. Kakudo, S. Sakaki-
bara, Y. Kishida, J. Mol. Biol. 1972, 72, 571 – 576; b) J. Bella, M.
Eaton, B. Brodsky, H. M. Berman, Science 1994, 266, 75 – 81;
c) R. Z. Kramer, L. Vitagliano, J. Bella, R. Berisio, L. Mazzar-
ella, B. Brodsky, A. Zagari, H. M. Berman, J. Mol. Biol. 1998,
À1
relative to these values are À2.5, À3.8, and À4.1 ppbK
,
respectively. The translational diffusion constants (given in
À10
2 À1
1
0
m s ) at 48C for peptide 2 (1.09) and peptide 3 (0.90
before and 0.82, after irradiation) are indicative of trimeric
species; at 278C the values for peptide 2 (1.34) and for peptide 3
before irradiation (1.15) correspond again to trimeric species,
while after irradiation of 3 in addition to the trimeric species
280, 623 – 638; d) K. Okuyama, V. Nagarajan, S. Kamitori, Proc.
Indian Acad. Sci. Chem. Sci. 1999, 111, 19 – 34; e) C. Hongo, V.
Nagarajan, K. Noguchi, S. Kamitori, K. Okuyama, Y. Tanaka, N.
Nishino, Polym. J. 2001, 33, 812 – 818; f) R. Berisio, L. Vita-
gliano, L.; Mazzarella, A. Zagari, Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 262 – 270;
g) J. Stetefeld, S. Frank, M. Jenny, T. Schulthess, R. A. Kam-
merer, S. Boudko, K. Landwehr, K. Okuyama, J. Engel, Structure
(0.61 and 1.07) a second species is formed, which shows a
diffusion constant of 1.55 supporting the presence of an unfolded
monomeric form.
[
16] The relative amounts of trans and cis isomers were determined
by integrating the signals of the amidic protons of the
2003, 11, 339 – 346; h) J. Bella, B. Brodsky, H. M. Berman,
1
azobenzene moiety in the 1D H NMR spectra at d = 9.34 and
Structure 1995, 3, 893 – 906; i) L. Vitagliano, R. Berisio, A.
Mastrangelo, L. Mazzarella, A. Zagari, Protein Sci. 2001, 10,
9
8
.08 ppm (48C), 9.21 and 8.94 ppm (228C), and 9.18 and
.86 ppm (278C), respectively.
2627 – 2632.
[
17] a) R. Nägele, R. Hoche, W. Zinth, J. Wachtveitl, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1997, 272, 489 – 495; b) I. K. Lednev, T.-Q. Ye, P. Matousek,
M. Towrie, P. Foggi, F. V. R. Neuwahl, S. Umapathy, R. E.
Hester, J. N. Moore, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 290, 68 – 74.
[
4] a) H. P. Bächinger, P. Bruckner, R. Timpl, D. J. Prockop, J.
Engel, Eur. J. Biochem. 1980, 106, 619 – 632; b) P. Bruckner, E. F.
Eikenberry, D. J. Prockop, Eur. J. Biochem. 1981, 118, 607 – 613;
c) J. Engel, D. J. Prockop, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.
[
18] T. Dartigalongue, F. Hache, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 415, 313 –
1991, 20, 137 – 152.
316.
[
5] A. Bachmann, T. Kiefhaber, S. Boudko, J. Engel, H. P. Bäch-
inger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13897 – 13902.
6] a) C. Renner, U. Kusebauch, M. Lꢀweneck, A. G. Milbradt, L.
Moroder, J. Pept. Res. 2005, 65, 4 – 14; b) G. A. Woolley, Acc.
Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 486 – 493; c) C. Renner, L. Moroder,
ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 868 – 878.
[
19] a) J. Helbing, H. Bregy, J. Bredenbeck, R. Pfister, P. Hamm, R.
Huber, J. Wachtveitl, L. De Vico, M. Olivucci, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 8823 – 8834; b) J. Bredenbeck, J. Helbing, A. Sieg, T.
Schrader, W. Zinth, J. Wachtveitl, C. Renner, R. Behrendt, L.
Moroder, P. Hamm,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6452 –
6457.
[20] a) Y. A. Lazarev, B. A. Grishkovsky, T. B. Khromova, Biopoly-
mers 1985, 24, 1449 – 1478; b) K. J. Payne, A. Veis, Biopolymers
1988, 27, 1749 – 1760; c) Y. A. Lazarev, A. V. Lazareva, V. M.
Komarov, J. Biol. Phys. 1999, 24, 217 – 221.
[
[
7] J. R. Kumita, O. S. Smart, G. A. Woolley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 2000, 97, 3803 – 3808.
[
8] a) V. Kräutler, A. Aemissegger, P. H. Hꢁnenberger, D. Hilvert,
T. Hanson, W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
4935 – 4942; b) S.-L. Dong, M. Lꢀweneck, T. Schrader, W. J.
7018
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7015 –7018