G. Depecker et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 8303–8306
8305
The synthesis of the cyclic N-protected hexameric back-
bone, shown in Scheme 1, was performed via a divergent
approach using classical deprotection–activation cou-
pling reactions in peptide chemistry. The orthogonally
N-protected aminoethylglycine 5, 6, and 7, 8 monomer
synthons were first prepared and condensed two by two
to afford the fully protected 9 and 10 dimers, respectively,
and, after suitable deprotections, their corresponding
dimers 11, 12 and 13. The two dimer units 11 and 12 that
were obtained from 9 were condensed together to produce
tetramer 14 which, after C-terminal deprotection, was
conjugated to dimer 13 to yield linear hexamer 16. This
hexamer, as its acid 17, was then grafted onto the
a-amino-v-ester linker 22 giving derivative 23. All Boc
deprotections were performed with TFA/CH Cl . All
cytosine and uracyl acetic acid base units 28 and 29,
respectively, followed by cytosine deprotection. First, the
three Alloc protecting groups were cleanly removed from
25 with Pd[PPh ] as allyl acceptor and DEA, and three
N-Z-cytosine acetic acid units 28 were then condensed
onto the triamine thus produced by means of HATU/
HOAt activation giving the mixed polyamide compound
26. Next, the selective cleavage of the three Troc groups
by means of cadmium in acetic acid followed by the
HATU/HOAt-mediated condensation of three uracyl
acetic acid units 29 on to the triamine thus generated,
afforded the cyclic Z-cytosine and uracyl hexameric PNA
27. Benzyloxycarbonyl (Z) removal was performed by
treatment with HBr in glacial acetic acid.
3
4
2
2
2
+
saponifications of methyl esters were Ca catalyzed using
LiOH (1N), CaCl , iPrOH/H O medium. The coupling
In conclusion, a cyclic protected hexameric amino-
ethylglycinamide framework carrying as many different
and orthogonal protecting groups as there are different
types of nucleobases in the target PNA sequence has been
prepared. This backbone allowed a cyclic hexameric
PNA complementary to the PACK HIV RNA loop
to be successfully synthesized following a liquid-
phase procedure (17 steps starting from monomers, acetic
2
2
reactions were achieved via isobutylchloroformate activa-
tion. Linker 22 was synthesized, as shown in Scheme 2,
from v-aminooctanoic and v-aminoheptanoic acids
using routine deprotection–activation processes (six-step
procedure from v-aminooctanoic acid).
†
The one-step and simultaneous N- and C-deprotection
of 23 with TFA/CH Cl afforded the bifunctional TFA
acid unit bases and linker afforded 5 mg of pure 1 in
6% overall yield). Although this particular hexameric
PNA loop 1 contains only two different nucleobases, our
FPB approach could be applied to any short cyclic
PNA (less than decamer) containing the four natural
or synthetic bases as a large palette of orthogonal
protecting groups is available. This liquid-phase FPB
approach allows selective, sequential and simultaneous
attachment of several nucleobase units on the protected
hexameric (aminoethylglycinamide) backbone. It also
offers several advantages such as a greater choice of
solvents and reagents, high solubility of the different
protected backbones, high coupling efficiencies, intro-
2
2
v-amino-a-acid 24 salt in quasi quantitative yield. The
key cyclization step of 24 leading to the cyclic fully
protected N-poly(aminoethylglycinamide) backbone 25
was achieved using HOAt/HATU activation. The head-
to-tail cyclization of 24 was performed under semi-high
dilution conditions (10 mM) in order to minimize inter-
molecular condensation and afford 25. Its structure and
purity were clearly attested by NMR, mass spectrometry
and HPLC analyses. Conversion of the orthogonally
hexa-protected cyclic precursor 25 into the target PNA
loop 1 required the introduction of the protected Z-
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) Alloc-Cl, 1N NaOH, dioxane, 1 h (90%); (b) N,N-dimethylformamide di-tert-butyl acetal,
toluene, 80°C, 2 h (90%); (c) Pd[P(Ph) ] , DEA, CH Cl , 10 min (90%); (d) Bop, NMM, CH Cl , 15 min (80%); (e) TFA, CH Cl ,
3
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
(
Z)
2
h (95%); (f) HOAt, HATU, DIPEA, DMF, 12 h (90%) and 28 (C -CH CO H) for compound 26, 15 min (84%) or 29
2 2
(
U-CH CO H) for compound 27, 15 min (70%); (g) Cd/AcOH, DMF, 5 h (80%); (h) HBr/AcOH, 2 days (70%).
2 2
†
HPLC (A/B 97:3 to 40:60 over 30 min): t =16.60 min, umax=201.5 and 270.9 nm. MS (ESI+) m/z 1778.7 (M+H)+.
R