F. Tamaddon et al. / Catalysis Communications 16 (2011) 194–197
197
The feasibility of scale up of the ZnO nanofluid-catalyzed reaction
of aniline with stearic acid was demonstrated by running the reaction
with 50 mmol of reactants at 110 °C and the yield was not changed
significantly.
The method offers considerable advantages in terms of simplicity,
feasibility of scale up, low environmental and economical impacts
and high chemoselectivity.
Based on these data, the most stable suspension of 1:1 nanoZnO to
fluid can be used as the most suitable nanofluid catalyst in further
studies. Therefore, the generality and versatility of direct amidation
of carboxylic acids catalyzed by ZnO nanofluid was confirmed by con-
verting various long and short chain aliphatic carboxylic acids and
amines into their corresponding amides. Aliphatic carboxylic acids
were reacted at 110 °C with aniline derivatives and aliphatic amines
to give the corresponding amides. MW irradiation of a premixed mix-
ture of reactants in an unmodified domestic oven produced the same
products in good to excellent yields at very short times (Table 2).
Trichloroacetic acid was quickly decarboxylated under similar re-
action conditions and suggested that, rapidly formed carboxylate
salts of benzylamine or aniline were decomposed kinetically before
condensation with amines (Table 2, entries 9 and 10).
Fatty acids were reacted with amines in the presence of ZnO nano-
fluid, to give the corresponding amides as emulsifiers, surfactants, lu-
bricants, and coating materials (entries 16–19).
Diacids such as oxalic and malonic acid were also carried out the
amidation with aniline under similar conditions and afforded the cor-
responding bisamides, oxanilide and malonanilide in high yields (en-
tries 20 and 21).
Acknowledgments
We gratefully thank the Yazd University Research Council for
financial support.
References
[
[
1] G. Sartori, R. Maggi, Chemical Reviews 113 (2010) PR1–PR54.
2] B.M. Choudary, K.V.S. Ranganath, J. Yadav, M.L. Kantam, Tetrahedron Letters 46
(2005) 1369–1371.
[3] G.A. Meshram, V.D. Patil, Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1117–1121.
[4] B. Karimi, J. Maleki, Journal of Organic Chemistry 68 (2003) 4951–4954.
[5] E. Comini, Analytica Chimica Acta 568 (2006) 28–40.
[6] S.K. Das, S.U.S. Choi, W. Yu, T. Pradeep, Nanofluids: Science and Technology,
Wiley-Interscience, 2007, pp. 397–450.
[
7] M. Hosseini Sarvari, H. Sharghi, Journal of Organic Chemistry 69 (2004)
573–2576.
8] Y.J. Kim, R.S. Varma, Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 7205–7208.
2
[
[9] Z. Mirjafary, H. Saedian, A. Sadeghi, F. Matloubi Moghaddam, Catalysis Communi-
cations 9 (2008) 299–306.
[
[
10] M. Hosseini Sarvari, H. Sharghi, Tetrahedron 61 (2005) 10903–11097.
11] F. Matloubi Moghaddam, H. Saeidian, Materials Science and Engineering B 139
(2007) 265–269.
[
12] E.K. Goharshadi, Y. Ding, P.J. Nancarrow, Physics and Chemistry of Solids 69
(2008) 2057–2060.
[
13] A.L. Linsebigler, G.Q. Lu, J.T. Yates, Chemical Reviews 95 (1995) 735–758.
However, the yields with aromatic carboxylic acids as lower active
reactants were not so high. Thus, benzanilide and N-phenylbenza-
mide were obtained in 60 and 57% yields, respectively (entries 22
and 23).
Acylation of secondary hindered amines such as N-methylaniline
or dipropylamine was not successfully and amines remained nearly
unchanged in the reaction with benzoic acid (conversion by TLC mon-
itoring b20%). Consequently, this simple procedure is highly chemo-
selctive for aliphatic carboxylic acids versus aromatic ones and
primary amines versus secondary amines.
[14] F. Tamaddon, M.R. Sabeti, A.A. Jafari, F. Tirgir, E. Keshavarz, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
accepted.
[
15] R. Jalal, E.K. Ghoharshadi, M. Abareshi, M. Moosavi, Materials Chemistry and
Physics 121 (2010) 198–201.
[16] T.W. Greene, P.G.M. Wuts, Protecting Groups in Organic Synthesis, Third ed,
Wiely, New York, 1999, pp. 76–86.
[
[
17] C.A.G.N. Montalbetti, V. Falque, Tetrahedron 61 (2005) 10827–10852.
18] J.R. Satam, R.V. Jayaram, Catalysis Communications 9 (2008) 2365–2370.
[19] R.D.C. Rodrigues, I.M.A. Barros, E.L.S. Lima, Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005)
5945–5947.
[
20] A. Khalafi-Nezhad, A. Parhami, M.N. SoltaniRad, A. Zarea, Tetrahedron Letters 46
2005) 6879–6882.
21] X. Wang, D.Z. Wang, Tetrahedron 67 (2011) 3406–3411.
(
[
Furthermore, competitive reactions between aliphatic and aromatic
substrates confirmed the chemoselectivity of ZnO nanofluid promoted
amidation of carboxylic acids (entries 24 and 25). Halo-substituted
acids such as 1- or 3-chloro-propionic acid were yielded a complex mix-
ture of substituted amide products which were not isolated.
The mechanistic studies were not made, whereas according to the
results it seems that carboxyl affinity of zinc oxide assisted to the pro-
ton exchange and improved the formation of carboxylic acid/amine
salt as kinetic product. The advantage of ZnO nanofluids is enhanced
formation of this salt due to the higher diffusion of catalyst in the re-
action mixture. This fact can be supported by chemoselective reaction
of aliphatic carboxylic acids which are able to contribute in a faster
proton exchange process than aromatic ones. Subsequent thermal py-
rolysis of the carboxylic acid/amine salt gives the corresponding
amide as final thermodynamic product (Scheme 2).
[22] V. Theodorou, M. Gogou, M. Philippidou, V. Ragoussis, G. Paraskevopoulos, K.
Skobridis, Tetrahedron 67 (2011) 5630–5634.
[
[
23] K. Ahlford, H. Adolfsson, Catalysis Communications 12 (2001) 1118–1121.
24] M. Sathishkumar, P. Shanmugavelan, S. Nagarajan, M. Maheswari, M. Dinesh, A.
Ponnuswamy, Tetrahedron Letters 22 (2011) 2830–2833.
[
[
[
[
25] P. Starkov, T.D. Sheppard, Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
9 (2011)
1320–1323.
26] X.D. Yang, X.H. Zeng, Y.H. Zhao, X.Q. Wang, Z.Q. Pan, L. Li, H.B. Zhang, Journal of
Combinatorial Chemistry 12 (2010) 307–310.
27] H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, K. Amani, Chemical Communications
64–765.
6 (2003)
7
28] B. Das, M. Krishnaiah, P. Balasubramanyam, B. Veeranjaneyulu, D. Nandan Kumar,
Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 2225–2227.
[29] F. Tamaddon, M.A. Amrollahi, L. Sharafat, Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005)
841–7844.
30] F. Tamaddon, M. Khoobi, E. Keshavarz, Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 3643–3646.
7
[
[31] F. Tamaddon, F. Tavakoli, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 337 (2011)
52–55.
[
[
[
[
32] F. Tamaddon, A. Nasiri, S. Farokhi, Catalysis Communications 12 (2011)
477–1482.
33] R.L. Shriner, R.C. Fuson, D.Y. Curtin, T.C. Morrill, The Systematic Identification of
Organic Compounds, Sixth Ed, Wiley, New York, 1980, pp. 540–550.
1
4
. Conclusion
34] C. Ferroud, M. Godrast, S. Ung, H. Borderies, A. Guy, Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008)
3004–3008.
In conclusion, ZnO nanofluid was used as a psudo-homogeneous
35] B. Narasimhan, ARKIVOC 15 (2007) 112–115.
and green media for the synthesis of amides from carboxylic acids.
+
ZnO nanofluid assists to H transfer
R1COOH + RNH2
R COO RH N
1
3
heat or MW
heat or MW
H O
1
R CONHR
-
2
Pyrolysis
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism of the reaction.