100 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2016
1
H), 3.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.07 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.59 (s, 3H), 2.21
lower catalyst loading and cost efficiency render this approach
as an interesting alternative.
+
(
quint, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H); MS (m/z): 182 (M ), 167, 154, 127, 83, 71.
,3-Dimethyl-9-phenyl-3,4-dihydroacridin-1(2H)-one (6): Yield:
3
2
0
–1
89%; m.p. 189–190 °C (lit. 191 °C); IR (KBr, cm ): 3068, 3035, 2949,
We are grateful to Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Research
Council for their financial support of this work (Grant:
3/333473).
1
2937, 2892, 2864, 1687, 1605, 1560, 1484, 1220, 772, 697; H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d ): δ 8.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (dt, J = 6.8,
6
1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.55 (m, 4H), 7.43 (dt, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.2 (dd,
J = 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (s, 2H, CH ), 2.59 (s, 2H, CH ), 1.18 (s, 6H,
2
2
Paper 1503483 doi: 10.3184/174751916X14531246648041
Published online: 29 January 2016
+
2
CH ); MS (m/z): 301 (M ), 299, 270, 244, 216, 196, 85, 71.
3
9
-Phenyl-3,4-dihydroacridin-1(2H)-one (7): Yield: 93%; m.p.
21
–1
1
1
8
53–155 °C (lit. 153–156 °C); IR (KBr, cm ): 3043, 2948, 2876, 1689,
555, 1486, 764, 703; H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ): δ 8.08 (d, J =
1
6
.4 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (dt, J = 6.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50–7.55 (m, 3H), 7.48 (dd,
1
Chem., 2000, 35, 1021.
J = 6.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (dt, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.6
Hz, 1H), 3.40 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (quint,
2
Young, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 1255.
+
J = 6.8 Hz, 2H); MS (m/z): 273 (M ), 270, 242, 215, 200, 188, 175, 150,
135, 108, 85, 71.
3
9
-Phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-cyclopenta[b]quinoline (9): Yield: 80%;
2
2
–1
m.p. 132–133 °C (lit. 132–134 °C); IR (KBr, cm ): 3057, 3029,
962, 2918, 1568, 1487, 1432, 1384, 1341, 1310, 764; H NMR (400
4
5
1
2
MHz, DMSO-d ): δ 8.09 (dd, J = 8.4, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61–7.68 (m, 2H),
6
7.51–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.49 (tt, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.42 (m, 3H), 3.26
2
004, 14, 1577.
(
t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.93 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.18 (quint, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H);
C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.4, 148.0, 142.6, 136.8, 133.6, 129.3,
6
7
E.A. Fehnel, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1966, 31, 2899.
C.-S. Jia, Z. Zhang, S.-J. Tub and G.-W. Wang, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006,
13
4
, 104.
R. Enugala, S. Nuvvula, V. Kotra, R. Varala and S.R. Adapa, Heterocycles,
008, 75, 2523.
1
(
28.8, 128.5, 128.2, 127.9, 126.2, 125.6, 125.4, 35.2, 30.3, 23.5; MS
+
8
9
m/z): 245 (M ), 243, 215, 201, 188, 168, 167, 138, 120, 108.
2
9
-(2-Aminophenyl)-3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-3,4,5,6,7,9-hexahydro-1H-
B.R. McNaughton and B.L. Miller, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 4257.
A. Arcadi, M. Chiarini, S. Di Giuseppe and F. Marinelli, Synlett, 2003,
203.
xanthene-1,8(2H)-dione (14): Yield: 94%; m.p. 190–191 °C; IR (KBr,
cm ): 3197, 2949, 2925, 2868, 1643, 1593, 755; H NMR (400 MHz,
10
–1
1
DMSO-d ): δ 10.47 (bs, NH2), 7.15 (dt, J = 7.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.59–7.05
11 P. Arumugam, G. Karthikeyan, R. Atchudan and D. Muralidharan, Chem.
Lett., 2005, 34, 3.
6
(m, 3H), 4.66 (s, 1H), 2.60 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H),
1
1
14
2
3
2
.3–2.4 (m, 4H), 1.99 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.94 (d, J =7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.12
+
(s, 3H), 1.03 (s, 3H), 0.99 (s, 6H); MS (m/z): 365 (M ), 364, 280, 265,
2
26, 210, 171, 149, 134, 107, 83, 78. Anal. calcd for C H NO : C,
2
3
27
3
Lett, 2003, 44, 255.
17 H. Eshghi, S. Momen, M. Gholizadeh and M. Vakili, J. Chem. Res., 2013,
37, 724.
7
5.59; H, 7.45; N, 3.83; found: C, 75.34; H, 7.38; N, 3.71%.
2
2
The melting points of the other products were: 8, 135–137 °C (lit.
2
2
22
136–138 °C; 10; 99–102 °C (lit. 100–102 °C); 11, 86–97 °C (lit.
2
2
8
6–88 °C); 12, 109–110 °C (lit. 108–110 °C) and compound 5 was an
18
B. Das, K. Damodar, N. Chowdhury and R.A. Kumar, J. Mol. Cat.
A-Chem., 2007, 274, 148.
19
oil (lit. oil).
19
P. Bandyopadhyay, G.K. Prasad, M. Sathe, P. Sharma, A. Kumarb and M.P.
Kaushik, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 6638.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a one-pot, mild, efficient, and environmentally
benign protocol has been developed for the synthesis of
quinoline derivatives catalysed by caesium iodide in high yields.
Compared to previously reported methods, moreover, the
mild reaction conditions, easy work-up, clean reaction profiles,
20 B.P. Reddy, P. Iniyavan, S. Sarveswari and V. Vijayakumar, Chin. Chem.
Lett., 2014, 25, 1595.
21
N. Anand, T. Chanda, S. Koley, S. Chowdhury and M.S. Singh, RSC Adv.,
015, 5, 7654.
2
2
2
A. Teimouri and A.N. Chermahini, Arabian J. Chem., 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.
arabjc.2011.05.018. [Epub ahead of print].