Quinolines via Friedl a¨ nder Synthesis
661
(
1
1
CDCl ): ꢂ ¼ 23.34, 52.40, 125.34, 126.02, 128.20, 128.57,
In these experiments the product was isolated by
filtration and the catalyst could be reloaded with
fresh reagents for further runs. Thus, recyclization
of catalyst is possible without significant loss of ac-
tivity (Table 1, entry 2). Finally, it should be men-
tioned that when reactions were carried out in the
absence of catalyst for long period of time (4–5 h)
3
29.01, 129.08, 129.92, 131.69, 132.83, 134.70, 145.24,
46.42, 154.94, 168.27 ppm.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the
Research Council of Shahid Beheshti University.
ꢁ
and in solvent free condition at 100 C the yields of
products were low (<30%).
References
In conclusion, we have developed a simple, effi-
cient, and green methodology for the synthesis of
quinolines using NaHSO –SiO under solvent-free
conditions. The simple experimental procedure, sol-
vent-free reaction conditions, good yields, and utili-
zation of an inexpensive and reusable catalyst are the
advantages of the present method.
[
[
1] (a) Larsen RD, Corley EG, King AO, Carrol JD, Davis P,
Verhoeven TR, Reider PJ, Labelle M, Gauthier JY,
Xiang YB, Zamboni RJ (1996) J Org Chem 61: 3398;
4
2
(
(
b) Chen YL, Fang KC, Shen JY, Hsu SL, Tzeng CC
2001) J Med Chem 44: 2374; (c) Roma G, Braccio MD,
Grossi G, Mattioli F, Ghia M (2000) J Med Chem 35:
021
2] (a) Kalluraya B, Sreenivasa S (1998) Farmaco 53: 399;
b) Doube D, Blouin M, Brideau C, Chan C, Desmarais
1
(
Experimental
S, Eithier D, Falgueyret JP, Friesen RW, Girrard M,
Girard Y, Guay J, Tagari P, Young RN (1998) Bioorg
Med Chem Lett 8: 1255
Melting points were measured on an Electrothermal 9200 appa-
ratus. IR spectra were recorded on a FT-IR 102MB BOMEM
apparatus. Mass spectra were recorded on a FINNIGAN-MAT
[
[
3] Maguire MP, Sheets KR, McVety K, Spada AP,
Zilberstein A (1994) J Med Chem 37: 2129
4] (a) Agrawal AK, Jenekhe SA (1991) Macromolecules
8
7
430 mass spectrometer operating at an ionization potential of
1
0eV. H and C NMR spectra were recorded on a BRUKER
13
1
24: 6806; (b) Zhang X, Shetty AS, Jenekhe SA (2000)
Macromolecules 33: 2064
DRX-300 AVANCE spectrometer at 300.13 and 75.47 MHz. H
1
3
and C NMR spectra were obtained on solutions in CDCl3
using TMS. All the products are known compounds and were
characterized by IR, NMR, and mass spectroscopic data and
their melting points were compared with reported values.
[
[
5] Friedl a¨ nder P (1882) Chem Ber 15: 2572
6] (a) Cheng CC, Yan SJ (1982) Org React 28: 37; (b)
Thummel RP (1992) Synlett: 1; (c) Gladiali S, Chelucci
G, Mudadu MS, Gastaut MA, Thummel RP (2001) J Org
Chem 66: 400
General Procedure
A mixture of 1 mmol 2-aminoarylketones (1a, 1b), 1 mmol
[
[
7] Fehnel EA (1966) J Heterocycl Chem 31: 2899
8] (a) Sterkowski L, Czamy A (2000) J Fluorin Chem 104:
281; (b) Hu YZ, Zang G, Thummel RP (2003) Org Lett
1
was heated at 100 C. The reaction was monitored by TLC.
,3-diketones or ketones (2a–2h), and 0.2g NaHSO –SiO
ꢁ
4
2
5
: 2251
[9] (a) Lee BS, Lee JH, Chi DY (2002) J Org Chem 67:
884; (b) Arcadi A, Chiarini M, Giuseppe SD, Marinelli
After completion, the reaction mixture was washed with
1
3
0cm EtOAc and filtered to recover the catalyst. Evapora-
7
tion of the solvent followed by purification by column chro-
matography (silica gel, EtOAc:n-hexane, 1:8) afforded the
corresponding pure quinoline derivative.
F (2003) Synlett: 203; (c) Jiang B, Si YG (2002) J Org
Chem 67: 9449; (d) Song SJ, Cho SJ, Park DK, Kwan
TW, Jenekhe SA (2003) Tetrahedron Lett 44: 255;
(e) Palimkar SA, Siddiqui SA, Daniel T, Lahoti RJ,
Srinivasan KV (2003) J Org Chem 68: 9371
Methyl-2-methyl-4-phenylquinoline-3-carboxylate
(
White powder (0.26 g, 94%), mp 147–149 C; IR (KBr):
3c, C H NO )
18 15 2
[
[
10] De SK, Gibbs RA (2005) Tetrahedron Lett 46: 1647
11] (a) Dos B, Venkataiah B (2000) Synthesis: 1671; (b)
Barton GW (1997) J Org Chem 62: 8952; (c) Dos B,
Venkateswarlu K, Mehender G, Holla H (2004) J Chem
Res (s): 836; (d) Ramesh C, Mahender G, Ravindranath
N, Das B (2003) Tetrahedron Let 44: 1465
ꢁ
ꢂ1
ꢁ
(
(
ꢀ¼ 3030, 2958, 1704, 1615 cm ; MS: m=z (%) ¼ 277
þ
1
M , 100), 246 (89), 218 (76); H NMR (CDCl ): ꢂ ¼ 2.84
3 3
3
1
3
C
s, CH ), 3.58 (s, OCH ), 7.27–8.22 (m, H–Ar) ppm;
NMR (CDCl ): ꢂ ¼ 23.25, 52.30, 125.19, 126.61, 126.87,
3
1
1
27.43, 128.10, 128.36, 128.71, 129.15, 130.93, 135.35,
46.64, 147.46, 154.57, 168.54 ppm.
[
12] (a) Dabiri M, Arvin-Nezhad H, Khavasi HR, Bazgie A
(
(
2007) Tetrahedron 63: 1770; (b) Shaabani A, Bazgir A
2004) Tetrahedron Lett 45: 2575; (c) Shaabani A,
Methyl-6-chloro-2-methyl-4-phenylquinoline-3-carboxylate
3k, C H ClNO )
Dabiri M, Bazgir A (2006) Dye and Pigments 71: 68;
(d) Bazgir A (2006) J Chem Res (s): 1
[13] Yadav JS, Rao PP, Sreenu D, Rao RS, Kumar VN,
Nagaiah K, Prasad AR (2005) Tetrahedron Lett 46: 7249
[14] Muscia GC, Bollini M, Carnevale JP, Bruno AM, Asis
SE (2006) Tetrahedron Lett 47: 8811
(
White powder (0.29 g, 92%), mp 131–133 C; IR (KBr):
1
8
14
2
ꢁ
ꢂ1
þ
ꢁ
ꢀ¼ 3027, 2964, 1701, 1617cm ; MS: m=z (%) ¼ 311 (M ,
1
100), 281 (181), 252 (40); H NMR (CDCl ): ꢂ ¼ 2.81 (s,
CH ), 3.59 (s, OCH ), 7.26–8.13 (m, H–Ar) ppm; C NMR
3
1
3
3
3