G. Rashinkar, R. Salunkhe / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 316 (2010) 146–152
147
991, 897, 791, 463 cm−1; Elemental analysis observed: %C 66.26, %H
5.17, and %N 5.06. Loading: 0.9 mmol functional group g−1 resin.
(SILP) catalyst containing l-prolinate anion under solvent-free con-
ditions.
2.3. General method for the synthesis of
1-amidoalkyl-2-naphthols
2. Experimental
2.1. General remarks
A mixture of 2-naphthol (1 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (1 mmol),
amide (1.5 mmol) and [FemSILP]l-prolinate (50 mg) was stirred at
100 ◦C in an oil bath. After completion of the reaction as mon-
itored by the TLC, acetone (10 mL) was added and the reaction
mixture was filtered. The catalyst was washed with acetone (2×
raphy over silica gel using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (1:4, v/v)
afforded pure 1-amidoalkyl-2-naphthols, which were character-
ized by spectral methods.
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Brucker Avon 300 MHz
spectrometer using DMSO-d6 as solvent using tetramethylsilane
(TMS) as an internal standard. Infrared spectra were recorded on
a PerkinElmer FTIR spectrometer. The samples were examined as
KBr discs ∼5% (w/w). Raman spectroscopy was done by means of
Brucker FT-Raman (MultiRAM) spectrometer. Mass spectra were
recorded on a Shimadzu QP2010 GCMS with an ion source temper-
ature of 280 ◦C. The materials were analysed by SEM using a JEOL
model JSM with 5 kV accelerating voltage. Elemental analyses were
performed on EURO EA3000 vectro model. For fluorescence studies,
the polymeric samples were suspended in methanolic solutions of
pyrene (0.01 M) and stirred for 4 h. After filtration and washing with
MeOH, the polymers were vacuum dried (60 ◦C). The samples were
introduced into fluorescence cells and excited at 338 nm (PC based
spectrofluorometer FP-750 JASCO, equipped with a 450 W xenon
lamp) and emitted light was recorded. The various aryl aldehydes
(Aldrich/BDH/Fluka), amides, 2-naphthol (sd Fine, India) and Mer-
rifield resin (2% cross-linked, 200–400 mesh, ca 2–3 mmol/g, Alfa
Aesar) were used as received. 1-N-Ferrocenylmethyl-1,2,4-triazole
was synthesized following the literature procedure [23].
Spectral
data
for
N-[(4-methyl-phenyl)-(2-hydroxy-
naphthalen-1-yl)-methyl] benzamide (Table 1, entry 6): 1H
NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): ı 1.95 (s, 3H), 5.55 (bs, 1H), 6.93 (s,
1H), 7.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 7.13–7.21 (m, 5H), 7.29
(d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 7.89
(d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (s, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 9.78 (s, 1H);
IR (neat, thin film): ꢀ = 3401, 3062, 2922, 1641, 1560, 1514, 1480,
1438, 1380, 1274, 1180, 813, 739 cm−1; MS (EI): m/z 366 (M+−1);
anal. calcd. for C25H21NO2 C 81.72 H 5.76 N 3.81; found: C 81.68 H
5.82 N 3.79.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation of SILP catalyst
2.2. Preparation of SILP catalyst
SILP catalysts are prepared either by simple depositing or by
covalent attachment of ILs on the surface of high area support
like silica or polymeric based materials. We envisioned latter as
support for the preparation of SILP catalyst in the present work
since they provide reasonable stability to mechanical, chemical
and thermal demands under normal operating conditions. As these
materials are not able to adsorb ILs as films onto the surface [24],
our approach was based on the immobilization by covalent bond-
ing the IL like unit. In the preparation of SILP catalyst (Scheme 1),
the 1-N-ferrocenylmethyl-1,2,4-triazole (1) was reacted with Mer-
rifield resin to give the [FemSILP]Cl (2). The resulting compound
when treated with aqueous solution of ammonia underwent anion
metathesis reaction to form [FemSILP]OH (3). The substitution
of hydroxide anion by prolinate by the reaction of [FemSILP]OH
with l-proline afforded the ferrocene labelled SILP containing l-
prolinate anion, [FemSILP]l-prolinate (4).
The Raman and IR spectroscopy was used to monitor the
progress of the reactions involved in the synthesis of SILP catalyst.
The reaction of 1 with Merrifield resin was monitored by Raman
spectroscopy. The intensities of bands at 639 cm−1 (C–Cl stretch-
ing band) and 1266 cm−1 (wagging bands of CH2–Cl) diminished
significantly while the peaks at 459 cm−1 (Fe–Cp stretching band),
1383 cm−1, 1415 cm−1 and 1532 cm−1 (ring stretching modes of tri-
azole ring), 3135 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 (C–H stretching of Cp rings)
increased in intensity after 72 h reflecting the substantial grafting of
1 onto Merrifield resin. Anion metathesis reactions were monitored
using IR spectroscopy. Appearance of a band of medium intensity at
3490 cm−1 (O–H stretch) in the IR spectrum of 3 clearly revealed the
considerable replacement of Cl by OH. The sharp band at 3397 cm−1
(N–H stretch) and 1633 cm−1 (C O stretch) in the IR spectrum of 4
confirmed the formation of [FemSILP]l-prolinate.
2.2.1. Preparation of [FemSILP]Cl (2)
A mixture of Merrifield resin (1.0 g) and 1-N-ferrocenylmethyl-
1,2,4-triazole (3 mmol) in 10 mL of toluene was heated at 80 ◦C
in an oil bath. After 72 h, the polymer was filtered, washed
with toluene (3× 20 mL), MeOH (3× 20 mL), CH2Cl2 (3× 20 mL)
and dried under vacuum at 50 ◦C for 48 h to afford [Fem-
SILP]Cl (2). IR (neat, thin film): ꢀ = 3111, 3014, 2923, 2847,
1601, 1556, 1490, 1450, 1390, 1259, 1187, 821, 699, 540 cm−1
Raman: ꢀ = 3186, 3135, 3007, 2891, 1532, 1415, 1383, 992,
;
792, 459 cm−1
; elemental analysis observed: %C 65.77, %H
4.68, and %N 4.44. Loading: 1.05 mmol functional group g−1
resin.
2.2.2. Preparation of [FemSILP]OH (3)
[FemSILP]Cl (1.0 g) was suspended in 10 mL of an aqueous solu-
tion of NH3. The system was stirred for 48 h at room temperature,
Afterwards the polymer was filtered and washed with MeOH (3×
20 mL), MeOH:H2O (1:1) (3× 20 mL), H2O (3× 20 mL) and MeOH
(3× 20 mL) and dried under vacuum at 50 ◦C for 48 h to afford
[FemSILP]OH (3). IR (neat, thin film): ꢀ = 3490, 3110, 3021, 2921,
2847, 1601, 1555, 1505, 1490, 1447, 1380, 1273, 1176, 818, 699,
543 cm−1; Raman: ꢀ = 3537, 3151, 3031, 2937, 2890, 1534, 1417,
1380, 991, 799, 460 cm−1; Elemental analysis observed: %C 66.06,
%H 4.93, and %N 5.01. Loading: 1.18 mmol functional group g−1
resin.
2.2.3. Preparation of [FemSILP]l-prolinate (4)
[FemSILP]OH (0.9 g) was suspended in 10 mL of a 1 M solution
of l-proline in MeOH:H2O (1:1). The system was heated at 60 ◦C
for 8 h. The filtration of the reaction mixture followed by wash-
ing with MeOH (3× 20 mL), MeOH:H2O (1:1) (3× 20 mL), H2O
(3× 20 mL) and MeOH (3× 20 mL) afforded [FemSILP]l-prolinate
(4). IR (neat, thin film): ꢀ = 3397, 3112, 3072, 2920, 2840, 1633,
1601, 1454, 1419, 1380, 1279, 1172, 818, 739, 551 cm−1; Raman:
ꢀ = 3380, 3185, 3137, 3008, 2890, 1610, 1531, 1416, 1382, 1049,
3.2. Morphology of SILP catalyst
An attempt was made to investigate the morphology of SILP
catalyst using scanning electron microscopy. The grafting of IL like