1854
H. Salavati, N. Rasouli / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1853–1859
2.4. General oxidation procedure catalyzed by PVMo/Bentonite
ꢀOH þ ꢀOH ! H2O2
(5)
(6)
(7)
nanocomposite under reflux
The catalytic reaction was performed in a 25 mL round-
bottomed flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a reflux
condenser. In a typical experiment, hydrogen peroxide (30%)
(1 mL), acetonitrile (5 mL), alkene substrate (0.8 mmole) and
ꢀOH þ ꢀHO2 ! H2O þ O2
ꢀ
ꢀOH þ H2O2 ! HO2 þ H2O
catalyst (2.86
mmol of PVMo) were added in the flask. The reaction
These radicals can react with organic compounds to form
products. The main oxidation pathway is direct pyrolysis, but in
the presence of oxidants such as HO28 and H2O2, radicals produced
in implosive bubbles can also be an important reaction pathway
[20–22].
In the present study, vanadium substituted heteropolymolyb-
date supported into bentonite (PVMo/Bentonite nanocomposite)
was synthesized. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
report about synthesis of heteropolymolybdate with layered
structure such as bentonite. The PVMo/Bentonite exhibited an
excellent catalytic activity for epoxidation of alkenes. Also, the
catalytic activity of the PVMo/Bentonite nanocomposite for
epoxidation of alkenes was improved as compared with the
unsupported heteropolymolybdate (PVMo).
was performed at 78 8C and was monitored by GC analysis. After
10 h, conversion of the substrate was measured by GC with the
internal standard method. At the end of reaction, the mixture was
diluted with Et2O (20 mL) and filtered. The catalyst was thoroughly
washed with Et2O and combined washings and filtrates were
purified on a silica gel plate or silica gel column. The catalyst alone
did not show any activity in the reactions studied.
2.5. General oxidation procedure catalyzed by PVMo/Bentonite
nanocomposite under ultrasonic irradiation
A UP 400S ultrasonic processor equipped with a 3 mm wide and
140 mm long probe, which was immersed directly into the
reaction mixture was used for sonication. The operating frequency
was 24 kHz and the output power was 0–400 W through manual
adjustment. The final volume of solution was 6 ml and the
temperature of the solution reached 60 8C during sonication.
To a mixture of alkene (0.8 mol) and the catalyst (containing
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals
2.86
mmol of PVMo) in acetonitrile (5 mL) was added H2O2 (1 mL,
All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further
purification. The Na5[PV2Mo10O40]ꢁ14H2O (PVMo) was prepared as
described in the literature [23]. Also, The PVMo/Bentonite with 20%
loading of PVMo was prepared. The UV–vis spectrum of solution
before and after impregnation showed that more than 99% of PVMo
was supported on the bentonite.
30%) and the mixture was exposed to ultrasonic irradiation. The
reaction was monitored by GC. After the reaction was completed,
the reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O (20 mL) and filtered.
The catalyst was thoroughly washed with Et2O and the combined
washings and filtrates were purified on a silica gel plates or silica
gel column.
2.2. Preparation of the PVMo/Bentonite nanocomposite
3. Results and discussion
The typical preparation method of PVMo/Bentonite is as
follows: PVMo (1.0 g) and bentonite (4.0 g) were mixed and put
into an agate mortar. The mixture was thoroughly ground for
20 min, washed in a supersonic washing machine using absolute
alcohol as dispersant and centrifuged. The washing and centrifug-
ing processes were repeated five times. The wet PVMo/Bentonite
were obtained and dried at 60 8C.
3.1. Characterization of the PVMo/Bentonite nanocomposite
The size of the PVMo nanoparticles were calculated from the
data of broadened XRD peaks by the Scherrer equation: D = 0.89
l/
b
cos . The bentonite has pores, whose diameters range from 10
u
to 50 nm and the heteropolyanions of the Keggin type structure
have molecular diameter of ꢃ1–2 nm. Therefore, it is feasible to
insert polyoxometalates such as Na5[PV2Mo10O40] between the
silicate layers of bentonite [24,25]. Also, the presence of the
heteropolymolybdate (PVMo) was confirmed by X-ray diffraction.
As shows in Fig. 1, the insertion of heteropolymolybdate
nanoparticles into the silicate layers of bentonite would make
the later expand, which results in the shift of the according
diffraction peak to smaller angle in the XRD patterns (Bragg’s
equation), but due to the strong interactions between PVMo and
the bentonite surface, the XRD patterns showed little angle shift,
which the heteropolymolybdate (PVMo) exhibited typical peaks at
2.3. Catalyst characterization
Elemental analysis was performed on a Perkin–Elmer 2400
instrument. Atomic absorption analyses were carried out on a
Shimadzu 120 spectrophotometer. Compositional and elemental
investigations were performed by backscattered electrons and EDX
analysis, respectively. UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra were
recorded on a Shimadzu UV-265 instrument using optical grade
BaSO4 as reference. FT-IR spectra were obtained as potassium
bromide pellets in the range 400–4000 cmꢂ1 with Nicollet-Impact
400D instrument. Scanning electron micrographs of the heteroge-
neous catalyst and support were taken on SEM Philips XL 30.
Powder X-ray diffraction data were obtained on a D8 Advanced
2u
: 8.898, 9.268, 10.158, 27.168 and 29.448 [15], while the as-
prepared PVMo/Bentonite composite showed peaks at 2 : 8.788,
u
26.728 and 28.888 that showed the PVMo was introduced in the
substitutional position of bentonite.
Bruker using Cu K radiation (2
experiments (GC) were performed on Shimadzu GC-16A
u
= 5–708). Gas chromatography
FT-IR spectrum of the PVMo/Bentonite catalyst in the range
700–1100 cmꢂ1 showed absorption bands at 1052, 952, 873 and
787 cmꢂ1, corresponding to the four typical skeletal vibrations of
the Keggin polyoxometalate (PVMo), which indicated that PVMo
has been supported into layeres of bentonite (Fig. 2). These peaks
a
a
instrument using a 2 m column packed with silicon DC-200 or
Carbowax 20 m. In all experiments the n-decane was used as the
internal standard. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker–
Arance AQS 300 MHz using CDCl3 as solvent and tetramethylsilane
(TMS) as the internal reference. Conversions and yields were
obtained by GC experiments and the products were identified after
isolation and purification.
could be attributed to n(P55Oa), n(Mo55Ot), n(Mo–Ob–Mo) and n
(Mo–Oc–Mo), respectively (Ot = terminal oxygen, Ob = bridged
oxygen of two octahedral sharing a corner and Oc = bridged
oxygen sharing an edge) [25]. The FT-IR spectra indicated that the