D. V. Moisee6 et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 3155–3157
3157
pares favorably with the earlier proposed system based
on triarylantimony dicarboxylates.
References
Scheme 3.
1. (a) Fujiwara, M.; Tanaka, M.; Baba, A.; Ando, H.;
Souma, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 525, 39–42; (b)
Kang, S.-K.; Ryu, H.-C.; Hong, Y.-T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3350–3351; (c) Kang, S.-K.; Ryu,
H.-C.; Lee, S.-W. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 610, 38–41;
(d) Kang, S.-K.; Ryu, H.-C.; Hong, Y.-T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 736–739; (e) Gushchin, A. V.; Moi-
seev, D. V.; Dodonov, V. A. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001, 50,
1291–1294; (f) Moiseev, D. V.; Gushchin, A. V.; Shavirin,
A. S.; Kursky, Yu. A.; Dodonov, V. A. Organomet. Chem.
2003, 667, 176–184.
2. (a) Matoba, K.; Motofusa, S.; Cho, C. S.; Ohe, K.;
Uemura, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 574, 3–10; (b) Cho,
C. S.; Tanabe, K.; Uemura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
1275–1278; (c) Cho, C. S.; Tanabe, K.; Itoh, O.; Uemura,
S. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 274–275.
As should be expected, better donor substituents
reduced the rate of the arylation reaction. So, in the
case of 2f, the yield of the product was smaller, com-
pared with 2b (Table 2, entries 1 and 5).
The catalytic mechanism is represented in Scheme 3.
Triphenylantimony diacetate formed during the prelim-
inary stage (Scheme 2) interacts with the active form of
the catalyst—Pd(0). As a result, intermediate 8 is
formed and it phenylates 1 immediately with formation
of the reaction product 7, the catalyst being trans-
formed again to the active form and the cycle being
repeated.
3. (a) Asano, R.; Moritani, I.; Fujiwara, Y.; Teranishi, S.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1973, 46, 2910–2911; (b) Kawamura,
K.; Kikukawa, K.; Takagi, M.; Matsuda, T. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1977, 50, 2021–2024; (c) Kikukawa, K.; Ikenaga,
K.; Wada, F.; Matsuda, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
5789–5792; (d) Gushchin, A. V.; Moiseev, D. V.;
Dodonov, V. A. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 2002, 72, 1669–1672
[Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2002, 72 (Engl. Transl.)].
4. Typical procedure for C-phenylation reaction: Ph3Sb (0.177
g, 0.5 mmol), Li2PdCl4 (5.2 mg, 0.02 mmol) and methyl
acrylate (0.135 ml, 1.5 mmol) in acetic acid (4 ml) were
placed in a 50 ml tube. The tube was sealed and the
reaction mixture was kept for 12 h at 50°C. The solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure. The solid residue
was filtered from inorganic products through a short
column on silica gel eluting with hexane–diethyl ether (v/v
4:1) mixture. The filtrate was analyzed by GLC. Methyl
cinnamate (0.151 g) was found.
The antimony(III) derivative 9 does not take part later
on in the reaction because it is not able to oxidize Pd(0)
to Pd(II). The yield of 7 can reach only 100% of initial
2a. As was shown earlier,1f,2a in the presence of oxygen
antimony compounds Ph2SbX can transfer the second
phenyl group onto palladium. Then the yield can attain
200% of 2a corresponding to the transfer of two of the
three possible phenyl groups of the starting
organometallic compound.
Hence, we offer a new catalytic system for C-arylation
of unsaturated compounds based on triarylstilbines in
the presence of equimolar amounts of a peroxide and a
catalytic amount of Li2PdCl4 (4 mol%). The role of the
peroxides is in the in situ preparation of triarylanti-
mony diacetates without isolation and purification of
the latter. H2O2 and t-BuOOH can be considered as the
best peroxides. This system enables the reaction to be
conducted at low temperatures with transfer of two of
the three possible aryl groups. The new system com-
5. (a) Dodonov, V. A.; Zinov’eva, T. I. Metallorg. Khim.
1992, 5, 1265–1271 [Organomet. Chem. USSR, 1992, 5
(Engl. Transl.)]; (b) Hiatt, R.; McColeman, C.; Howe, G.
R. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 559–563.