Inorganic Chemistry
Communication
These compounds are potential candidates for incorporation
in luminescent sensors and photoactive materials, e.g., for the
detection of aromatic organic molecules.10 When the dried 1 and
2 solids were exposed to water vapor, the original luminescence
spectra were regenerated; this means that the original frame-
works of 1 and 2 are fully restored (Figures S3−S5 in the SI).
To assess the catalytic effects of 1 and 2, we applied them to
the transesterification of various esters in CH3OH at 50 °C. The
reaction of 4-nitrophenyl acetate and methanol in the presence of
1 and 2 quantitatively produced methyl acetate within 2 and 5 h
(eq 1), respectively, under neutral conditions (entry 1 of Table
S1 in the SI).
structural data, and X-ray crystallographic data for 1 and 2 in CIF
format. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
(C.K.).
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by
the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant 2010-
0003672). X-ray crystallography at the PLS-II 2D-SMC beamline
was supported, in part, by MEST and POSTECH.
The catalytic results indicate that 1 has a higher catalytic
activity for ester synthesis by transesterification than 2. This is
attributed to the fact that the second-period transition metals are
much less labile, thereby hindering the substitution reaction.11
Importantly, the transesterification reactivity of zinc-containing 1
is the best among the previously reported catalytic systems with
zinc-containing polymeric compounds, to our knowledge.12a−c
Moreover, 2 is recyclable, although its activity is somewhat
reduced after recycling (Table S2 in the SI). The amount of
cadmium that leached into the filtrate after two cycles was
measured via inductively coupled plasma spectroscopic analysis
and determined to be 15 ppm.12c The loss of catalyst due to
leaching was calculated to be ∼2 wt % and thus may be
considered negligible. Transesterification reactions of other
esters using catalysts 1 and 2 were also carried out, and the results
are given in Table S1 in the SI. Various esters were converted to
their corresponding products within 2−14 and 5−240 h using 1
and 2, respectively. On the basis of our present and previous
results,12a−c we assume that the transesterification reactions
occur outside the framework because the results of the
transesterification reactions catalyzed by 2 showed a trend
similar to those observed using our previously reported
homogeneous catalysts.12a,b Specifically, 2 did not display any
size effects that could possibly occur inside the framework.
Therefore, the substrate phenyl acetate substitutes the labile
water molecules of the exterior cadmium ions to produce the
cadmium−substrate adduct. Then, the methanol nucleophile
attacks the carbon atom of the carbonyl moiety of the adduct to
produce the methyl phenyl acetate product. These results
suggest that 1 and 2 could be used as catalysts for the
transesterification of various esters.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Suh, M. P.; Park, H. J.; Prasad, T. K.; Lim, D. W. Chem. Rev.
2012, 112, 782. (b) Choi, H. S.; Suh, M. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 6865. (c) Halder, G. J.; Kepert, C. J.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K. S.;
Cashion, J. D. Science 2002, 298, 1762. (d) Coronado, E.; Galan-
Mascaros, J. R.; Gomez-Garcia, C. J.; Laukhin, V. Nature 2000, 408, 447.
(e) Schneider, V.; Demeshko, S.; Dechert, S.; Meyer, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9274. (f) Seward, C.; Pang, J.; Wang, S. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2002, 1390. (g) Cui, Y.; Xu, H.; Yue, Y.; Guo, Z.; Yu, J.; Chen, Z.;
Gao, J.; Yang, Y.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3979.
(h) Tseng, Y.-H.; Bhattacharya, D.; Lin, S.-M.; Thanasekaran, P.; Wu, J.-
Y.; Lee, L.-W.; Sathiyendiran, M.; Ho, M.-L.; Chung, M.-W.; Hsu, K.-C.;
Chou, P.-T.; Lu, K.-L. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 6805.
(2) (a) Zeng, F.; Ni, J.; Wang, Q.; Ding, Y.; Ng, S. W.; Zhu, W.; Xie, Y.
Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1611. (b) Wang, Q.-G.; Xie, Y.-S.; Zeng, F.-
H.; Ng, S.-W.; Zhu, W.-H. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2010, 13, 929.
(c) Bauer, C. A.; Timofeeva, T. V.; Settersten, T. B.; Patterson, B. D.;
Liu, V. H.; Simmons, B. A.; Allendorf, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
7136.
(3) Allendorf, M. D.; Bauer, C. A.; Bhakta, R. K.; Houk, R. J. T. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1330.
(4) (a) Ozdemir, T.; Atilgan, S.; Kutuk, I.; Yildirim, L. T.; Tulek, A.;
Bayindir, M.; Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2105. (b) Zou, R.-Q.;
Sakurai, H.; Xu, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2542. (c) Wu, C.-D.;
Hu, A.; Zhang, L.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8940.
(5) Shin, J. W.; Min, K. S. Acta Crystallogr. 2012, E68, o1600.
(6) See the Supporting Information.
(7) Spek, A. L. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 7.
(8) (a) Luo, J.; Li, W. S.; Xu, P.; Zhang, L. Y.; Chen, Z. N. Inorg. Chem.
2012, 51, 9508. (b) Kunkely, H.; Vogler, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 376,
226.
(9) (a) Braverman, M. A.; LaDuca, R. L. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7,
2343. (b) Shyu, E.; Supkowski, R. M.; LaDuca, R. L. Inorg. Chem. 2009,
48, 2723. (c) Shyu, E.; Supkowski, R. M.; LaDuca, R. L. Cryst. Growth
Des. 2009, 9, 2481. (d) Prabhakar, M.; Zacharias, P. S.; Das, S. K. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 44, 2585.
(10) (a) Fang, Q.; Zhu, G.; Xue, M.; Sun, J.; Sun, F.; Qiu, S. Inorg.
Chem. 2006, 45, 3582. (b) Shimizu, M.; Takeda, Y.; Higashi, M.;
Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3653.
(11) Lippard, S. J.; Berg, J. M. Principles of Bioinorganic Chemistry;
University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1994.
(12) (a) Kwak, H.; Lee, S. H.; Kim, S. H.; Lee, Y. M.; Lee, E. Y.; Park, B.
K.; Kim, E. Y.; Kim, C.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, Y. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 408.
(b) Park, B. K.; Eom, G. H.; Kim, S. H.; Kwak, H.; Yoo, S. M.; Lee, Y. J.;
Kim, C.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, Y. Polyhedron 2010, 29, 773. (c) Hwang, I. H.;
Bae, J. M.; Kim, W.-S.; Jo, Y. D.; Kim, C.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Huh, S.
Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 12759. (d) Samanta, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Patil, Y.
P.; Mukherjee, P. S. Chem.Eur. J. 2012, 18, 12322.
In conclusion, two coordination polymer networks, 1 and 2,
with different metal ions were constructed using tpmd. The
zinc(II) ions in 1 show octahedral and tetrahedral coordination
geometries, while 2 displays only octahedral coordination
geometries. The topologies of 1 and 2 are 3D network structures.
1 and 2 have strong emission at ∼397 and 361 nm, respectively. 1
shows more efficient catalytic activity for the transesterification
of various esters than 2 does. Further studies on the mechanism
of the catalytic transesterification and luminescence and the
fabrication of new coordination networks are ongoing.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Details of the synthesis, analytical results, TGA data,
■
S
luminescence data, transesterification results, PXRD patterns,
C
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic302375z | Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX