P. Zheng, W. Zhang / Journal of Catalysis 250 (2007) 324–330
325
(
PMAA) as a scaffold to immobilize the palladium catalyst,
2.2. Synthesis of PS-co-PAEMA-co-PMAA core–shell
microspheres
and then studied the Suzuki and Heck reactions via the re-
sultant pH-responsive colloid-supported palladium catalyst.
We chose the core–shell microspheres of poly[styrene-co-2-
To a 500-mL flask were added 3.0 g of MAA, 3.6 g of
styrene, and 5.5 g of AEMA (at a molar ratio of 4:4:3). Sub-
sequently, 390 mL of double-distilled water was added. The
mixture was vigorously stirred for 30 min at room tempera-
ture. Then 0.47 g of K S O was added, and the mixture was
(
acetoacetoxy)ethyl methacrylate-co-methyl acrylic acid] (PS-
co-PAEMA-co-PMAA) as the scaffold for three reasons. First,
because PAEMA is a typical coordination polymer contain-
ing tethered ligands, the present colloid is able to coordinate
2
2
8
with the ions of Pd2 , and thus no additional ligand is needed
+
degassed under nitrogen purge. Finally, polymerization was
◦
[
23–25]. Second, the pH-responsive colloid and the colloid-
performed at 80 C for 24 h under vigorously stirring. The re-
supported palladium catalyst can be dispersed in basic aqueous
solution. This suggests that the present palladium catalyst has
a potential to bridge the gap between the easy recoverable het-
erogeneous catalyst and the highly efficient homogeneous one.
Third, the pH-responsive colloid-supported palladium catalyst
can be easily separated from the reaction mixture and recovered
by first acidifying and then filtrating the dispersion of the cat-
alyst due to the pH-responsive PMAA segment. Furthermore,
the PS segment with a relatively high glass transition tempera-
sultant core–shell microspheres of PS-co-PAEMA-co-PMAA
were first precipitated in 0.1 mol/L HCl aqueous solution, fil-
trated, washed with water, and finally dried under vacuum.
2.3. Synthesis of pH-responsive colloid-supported palladium
catalyst (pH-responsive catalyst)
First, a given amount of the core–shell microspheres of PS-
co-PAEMA-co-PMAA was dispersed in aqueous solution at
pH 8.0 to form 1.50 mg/mL of pH-responsive colloidal dis-
persion. Subsequently, a given volume of 10.0 mmol/L PdCl2
aqueous solution was added to keep the molar ratio of AEMA to
◦
ture (∼103 C) is also introduced into the core of the core–shell
microspheres to increase the thermal stability of the colloids,
because the glass transition temperature of the core-forming
◦
2+
segment of PAEMA is as low as 3 C [24].
Pd equal to 4:1. The mixture was kept overnight at room tem-
Compared with heterogeneous palladium catalysts immobi-
lized in cross-linked silica gels or insoluble polystyrene resins,
the present pH-responsive colloid-supported palladium catalyst
has four merits. First, it has the obvious advantage of high
degree of dispersion, and thus its high efficiency is expected.
Second, it can be easily separated from the reaction mixture
and recovered simply by adjusting pH of the aqueous medium.
Third, it can work efficiently in water. Finally, its preparation is
simple. The pH-responsive colloid of core–shell microspheres
can be synthesized by one-stage, soap-free emulsion polymer-
ization in water.
perature, after which a 20-fold excess of 0.40 mol/L NaBH4
aqueous solution was added under vigorous stirring. The mix-
ture immediately turned a deep-brown color and was main-
tained at room temperature under vigorous stirring for 4 h.
The resultant pH-responsive colloidal dispersion was dialyzed
against water at room temperature for 4 days.
2.4. Typical procedures for Suzuki reaction
To a screw-capped vial with a side tube 2.0 mmol of aryl
halide, 6.0 mmol of K CO , 3.0 mmol of benzenboronic acid
2
3
(
50% excess), and 5.0 mL of dispersion of the pH-responsive
catalyst were added. The mixture was degassed under nitrogen
purge for 10 min at room temperature, after which the vial was
put in a preheated oil bath at a given temperature and mag-
netically stirred under nitrogen. After the reaction was com-
pleted, the mixture was cooled to room temperature instantly,
and then acidified with 0.1 mol/L HCl aqueous solution. The
pH-responsive catalyst precipitated and was separated by sim-
ple filtration. Subsequently, a 4-fold excess volume of CH2Cl2
was added into the filtrate to extract organic compounds for
3 times. The organic phase was collected and washed with
10 mL of water 3 times. Subsequently, the organic phase was
concentrated and the resultant product was dried under vacuum
2
. Experimental
2
.1. Materials
Styrene (St, >98%), methylacrylic acid (MAA, >99%) and
methyl acrylate (MA, >99%) were purchased from Tianjin
Chemical Company and distilled under vacuum before be-
ing used. The monomer of 2-(acetoacetoxy)ethyl methacrylate
(
AEMA, >95%; Aldrich) and the reagents such as benzen-
boronic acid (>99%; Beijing Wisdom Chemicals Company),
p-chloroacetophenone (>99%, Merck-Schuchardt), p-bro-
mophenol (>99%, Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Re-
search Institute), p-bromoacetophenone (>99%, Alfa Aesar),
iodobenzene (>98%, Alfa Aesar), p-bromobenzoic acid
◦
1
at 40 C, weighted, and analyzed by H NMR.
2.5. Typical procedures for Heck reaction
(
(
(
>99%, Beijing Henye Fine Chemical Company), K S O
2 2 8
>99.5%, Tianjin Chemical Company), PdCl2·2H2O
To a screw-capped vial with a side tube containing 2.0 mmol
of aryl halide, 6.0 mmol of K CO , 3.0 mmol of methyl acrylate
>99.99%, Tianjin Chemical Company), NaBH4 (>98.9%,
2
3
Tianjin Chemical Company), p-bromoanisole (>99%, Tian-
jin Chemical Company) and p-chlorophenol (>99.5%, Tianjin
Chemical Company) were used as received.
(50% excess), and 5.0 mL of dispersion of the pH-responsive
catalyst were added. The mixture was degassed under nitrogen
purge for 10 min at room temperature, after which the vial was