ORGANIC
LETTERS
2002
Vol. 4, No. 25
4399-4401
Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as a
Reusable Solvent Medium for Organic
Synthesis. Application in the Heck
Reaction†
S. Chandrasekhar,* Ch. Narsihmulu, S. Shameem Sultana, and
N. Ramakrishna Reddy
Organic Chemistry DiVision-I, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology,
Hyderabad 500 007, India
Received August 8, 2002
ABSTRACT
PEG has been used as a solvent medium for regioselective Heck reactions with easy recyclability of solvent and Pd catalyst for the first time.
Solvents are widely used in organic synthesis and have been
a cause of major concern due to their associated environ-
mental hazards. The major disadvantages are their pyrophoric
nature, volatility, and poor recovery. To address some of
these issues, attempts have been made to develop solvent-
free chemistry, which to some extent has been successful
for a few transformations.1 However, in performing the
majority of organic transformations, solvents play a critical
role in making the reaction homogeneous and allowing
molecular interactions to be more efficient. In recent times
ionic liquids have been in the forefront of research, and
several publications and reviews have already appeared.2
Even though ionic liquids offer some advantages, the tedious
preparation of ionic liquids (and raw materials for ionic
liquids) and their environmental safety is still debated. To
address the concerns raised by volatile organic solvents, we
initiated a new program to identify whether any available
liquid polymers or low melting polymers can be used as
solvents.3 We herein report the application of poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) having molecular weight 2000 (or lower) as
an efficient reaction medium for Pd-catalyzed C-C bond
formation, namely, the Heck reaction.4,5 We have noticed
that this transformation is more rapid and high yielding, and
the catalyst is easily recycled with high efficiency. Interest-
ingly, the stereo- and regioselectivities are also different from
those with conventional solvents and ionic liquid media. The
(3) (a) Santaniello, E.; Manzocchi, A.; Sozzani, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979,
47, 4581. (b) Buchardt, J.; Meldal, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8695.
(c) Badone, D.; Jommi, G.; Pagliarin, R.; Tavecchia, P. Synthesis 1987,
920. (d) Babonneau, M. T.; Jacquier, R.; Lazaro, R.; Viallefont, P.
Tetrahedron Lett, 1989, 30, 2787. (e) Heiss, L.; Gais, H. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 3833. (f) Ebert, C.; Gardossi, L.; Linda, P.; Vesnaver, R.;
Bosco, M. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 4867. (g) Namboodiri, V. N.; Varma, R.
S. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 146.
(4) (a) Dick, H. A.; Heck, R. F. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 1083. (b) Jeffery,
T. Chem. Commun. 1984, 1287. (c) De Meijere, A.; Meyer, F. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 2379. (d) Crisp, G. T. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998, 27,
427. (e) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3009.
(5) (a) Kaufmann, D. E.; Nouroozian, M.; Henze, H. Synlett 1996, 1091.
(b) Carmichael, A. J.; Earle, M. J.; Holbry, J. D.; McComac, P. M.; Seddon,
K. R. Org. Lett. 1997, 1, 997. (c) Xu, L.; Chen, W.; Xiao, J. Organometalics
2000, 19, 1123. (d) Hagiwara, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Hoshi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ando,
M.; Ohkubo, K.; Yokoyama, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4349. (e)
Deshmukh, R. R.; Rajagopal, R.; Srinivasn, K. V. Chem. Commun. 2001,
1544.
† IICT communication 020702.
(1) (a) Cave, G. W. V.; Raston, C. L.; Scott, J. L. Chem. Commun. 2001,
2159. (b) Toda, F.; Tanaka, K. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1025. (c) Cave, G.
W. V.; Raston, C. L. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2199. (d) Toda, F. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1995, 28, 480. (e) Toda, F. Synlett 1993, 303.
(2) (a) Welton, T. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2071. (b) Wasserscheid, P.;
Keim, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3773. (c) Gordon, C. M. Appl.
Catal., A 2001, 222, 101. (d) Sheldon, R. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2399.
10.1021/ol0266976 CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/21/2002