converted to the corresponding dehalogenated products, while a
dihalomethane insecticide, DDD (entries 2 and 3) was converted
within 1 h under the photocatalysis conditions, followed by UV-
vis spectroscopy as shown in Fig. S3 in ESI.† The UV-vis spectral
change in Fig. S3(c) revealed that over 80% of 2 was unchanged
after the photocatalysis of DDT. This result confirms the good
stability of the photosensitizer in the present system. This result
also suggests the efficient electron transfer from the electron
donor (TEOA) to the final electron acceptor (DDT) to afford
~1000 turnovers relative to 2.
into a substituted stilbene, consistent with a report using NaBH
as a chemical reductant. The use of cyanocobalamin (vitamin
4
4
B
12) instead of 1 reduced a water-soluble disinfection by-product
under an aqueous condition (a- haloacid, entry 5).
Using the radical generation capability of the alkyl-cobalt
20,23,24
complex form of 1 under the photochemical conditions,
we
2
+
then attempted to apply the present system to radical-involved
Our previously reported B12–Ru(bpy) system showed 210
27,28
2+
organic syntheses.
To show the utility of the present system
turnovers for photocatalysis of DDT relative to Ru(bpy) as
13
involving the highly nucleophilic Co(I) species of 1, we here chose
the substrates of alkyl bromides having unactivated carbon-
halogen bonds, which cannot be easily reduced by the previously
shown in Entry 6 in Table S1.† It should be noted that the
turnover numbers of the present B12-Rose Bengal system is a
2
+
factor of 4.8 greater turnovers than those of the B12–Ru(bpy)
2
+
12–16
reported Ru(bpy) system.
3-Bromopropylbenzene was ef-
system. This enhanced catalytic activity results from the fact
that the compound 2 has a strong absorption in visible region
and the triplet excited state of 2 is efficiently quenched by
the oxidative quenching of 1. In comparison to Rose Bengal,
ficiently debrominated due to the Co(I) species of 1 to afford the
debrominated products (entry 6). When we performed the same
reaction in the presence of methyl acrylate, a carbon-carbon
bond formation through the 1,4-radical addition to the olefin
was achieved in a moderate yield (entry 7). The system effectively
catalyzed the 1,2-migrations of the acyl group with excellent
selectivity to the ring-expansion using an activated alkyl bromide
2
+
Ru(bpy) has a weaker absorption in the visible region and is
excited less efficiently because of the overlay of the absorption
with 1. Although we have reported the B12-titanium dioxide
system for photocatalysis of several alkyl halides, the system
23,24
(
Table 1, entry 8).
is driven by ultraviolet light.
In the present study, we have
To gain mechanistic insight into the photochemical reduction
successfully replaced the previous ultraviolet-light-driven system
to the visible-light-driven system under mild conditions as an
environmentally benign and noble-metal-free method.
In conclusion, we show that the present B12-Rose Bengal
system serves as a simplified analogy for the electron transport
chain of dehalorespiration to efficiently degrade various toxic
halogenated compounds. Furthermore, the present system can
serve as an effective alternative for traditional organic syntheses
with tin hydrides to access radical chemistry.
This work was supported by the Global COE Program
“Science for Future Molecular System” from MEXT of Japan,
and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21.02310) and a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (21245016) from the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
of 1, quenching experiments of both the singlet and triplet
excited states of 2 in MeOH were performed. No fluorescent
quenching of 2 was observed upon the addition either TEOA
or 1. On the other hand, the triplet quenching of 2 was
observed upon the addition of TEOA or 1, having quenching rate
6
9
-1 -1
constants (k ) of 1.0 ¥ 10 and 7.2 ¥ 10 M s , respectively (Fig.
q
S4 in ESI†). Based on these results, two possible mechanisms are
proposed as shown in Scheme 1. Not the singlet, but the triplet
of 2 participates in the electron transfer while both reductive
21
and oxidative quenching are thermodynamically possible. At
-
1
-4
the same concentrations of TEOA (5.0 ¥ 10 M) and 1 (5.0 ¥ 10
M) as those of the photocatalysis conditions, the reductive and
oxidative quenching rates are calculated using the k values and
q
5
-1
6
-1
determined to be 5.0 ¥ 10 s and 3.6 ¥ 10 s , respectively. Thus,
the oxidative quenching favorably proceeds over the reductive
quenching during photocatalysis because the former rate is a
factor of 7.2 greater than the latter rate.
Notes and references
1
C. Holliger, G. Wohlfarth and G. Diekert, FEMS Microbiol. Rev.,
999, 22, 383–398.
1
2
B. Kr a¨ utler, W. Fieber, S. Ostermann, M. Fasching, K. Ongania, K.
Gruber, C. Kratky, C. Mikl, A. Siebert and G. Diekert, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 2003, 86, 3698.
3
4
5
K. L. Brown, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2075.
D. Zanette and F. Nome, J. Org. Chem., 1979, 44, 2308.
J. F. Rusling, C. L. Miaw and E. C. Couture, Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29,
2
025.
6
7
8
9
D. R. Burris, C. A. Delcomyn, M. H. Smith and A. L. Roberts,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 1996, 30, 3047.
Scheme 1
J. A. Shey and W. A. Van Der Donk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
1
2403–12404.
A previously reported study has shown that 2 is reductively
K. M. McCauley, D. A. Pratt, S. R. Wilson, J. Shey, T. J. Burkey and
W. A. Van Der Donk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 1126.
A. Albini and M. Fagnoni, Green Chem., 2004, 6, 1.
26
photobleached in the presence of TEOA, and the present
photocatalysis is also accompanied with the bleaching of 2 as
indicated in Fig. 1. This bleaching is due to the hydrogen atom
1
0 G. Palmisano, V. Augugliaro, M. Pagliaro and L. Palmisano, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 3425.
∑
3-
3- 26
abstraction of RB to form the hydrated species (RBH ), and
11 M. Fagnoni, D. Dondi, D. Ravelli and Angelo Albini, Chem. Rev.,
2007, 107, 2725.
∑
3-
RB is more easily formed as the concentration of 1 (Co(II)
species) decreases in the absence of halogenated substrates.
Actually, this photobleaching was well suppressed upon the
addition of 1, and efficiently upon the addition of 1 and DDT
1
1
2 S. Fukuzumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1997, 70, 1.
3 H. Shimakoshi, M. Tokunaga, T. Baba and Y. Hisaeda, Chem.
Commun., 2004, 1806.
14 D. A. Nicewicz and D. W. C. MacMillan, Science, 2008, 322, 77.
5
60 | Green Chem., 2011, 13, 558–561
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011