Curtius Rearrangement of Acyl Azides Revisited
SHORT COMMUNICATION
TS2a lying only 0.7 kcal/mol above the oxazirene structure to cyanate HOCN and PhOCN + N2 with barriers of less
2a. Note however that the structure of their TS2a corre- than 1 kcal/mol. We do not believe these carbene intermedi-
sponds very closely to our TS3a (HOCN Ǟ HNCO), which ates are realistic; concerted rearrangement on the excited
lies 5.5 kcal/mol higher than 2a at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) state energy surfaces of the azides is more likely.
level.
In conclusion, phenyl cyanate (4c) is formed in small
HOCN was found to be 28.7 kcal/mol less stable than amount along with the main product, phenyl isocyanate
HNCO at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level. The triplet nitrene (3c) on photolysis of benzoyl azide (1c). Both cyanate and
2a (3AЈЈ) did rearrange to HNCO and HOCN.
isocyanate are formed on photolysis of the (singlet) nitrene/
Shapley and Backskay[4c] located TS1a (1AЈ oxazirene Ǟ oxazirine 2c at 308 nm. Both cyanate and isocyanate are
HNCO) lying 30 kcal/mol above oxazirene (2a) when using also formed on photolysis of the azide 1c at 254 nm; this
the G2 computational method, but a direct path from 2a to may be a direct reaction of an excited state of the azide, or
HOCN (TS2a) was not reported. HOCN was 25.4 kcal/mol it may be a rapid reaction via the nitrene. The thermal Curt-
less stable than HNCO, and the direct isomerization ius rearrangement produces only the isocyanate 3c. Further
HNCO Ǟ HOCN had a barrier (TS3a) of 88 kcal/mol experimental and theoretical work on the Curtius re-
(HOCN Ǟ HNCO has a barrier of 62.6 kcal/mol).
arrangement is envisaged, e. g. an examination of substitu-
We found TS1a (oxazirene Ǟ HNCO, 15.8 kcal/mol) by ent effects on the barrier heights for cyanate and isocyanate
using B3LYP/6-31G(d) for the parent compound 2a, but formation. No direct evidence for the formation of nitrile
TS2a (oxazirene Ǟ HOCN) was not located on the singlet oxides, RCNO, in the Curtius rearrangement has been
surface. At the HF/6-31G(d.p) level, TS1a and TS2a were found so far, although such a rearrangement cannot be ex-
located. At the CASSCF(8,8) level, TS1a was securely lo- cluded.[12]
cated with both Gaussian03 and Molpro; it is about
20 kcal/mol above 2a. When using CASSCF(12,12) this en-
Experimental Section
ergy difference increases to 25.5 kcal/mol, which is in better
agreement with the literature.[4c] As for TS2a, it appeared
to be ca. 6 kcal/mol above TS1a, but it is most likely that
all structures obtained for TS2a at CASSCF levels are arti-
facts, since in neither case could they be verified by IRC
calculations.
Benzoyl azide was prepared following the procedure of Barrett and
Porter,[13] and phenyl cyanate by the procedure of Murray and
Zweifel.[14]
Matrix Isolation Procedure: A gaseous mixture of argon and ben-
zoyl azide (ratio Ϸ 1000:1) is deposited slowly onto a CsBr window
at 20 K. The matrix is irradiates with a 254-nm low-pressure mer-
cury lamp (75 W; Graentzel, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 5 to 20 min
(depending on the amount of azide), which leads to the complete
decomposition of the azide and the formation of phenyl isocyanate,
phenyl cyanate and singlet benzoylnitrene. Prolonged photolysis for
2–5 min with 308 nm excimer lamp (50 mW/cm2; Ushio, Singapore)
results in larger amounts of phenyl isocyanate, while the amount
of phenyl cyanate increases slightly. Relevant IR spectra are shown
in the supporting information. GC/MS analysis: For GC/MS
analysis of the products of the matrix photolysis, the cold window
and the inner surfaces of the cryostat cold head are rinsed with
dichloromethane after warming to room temperature and exam-
ined on a 30 m capillary column DB-5ms, diameter 0.32 mm, sta-
tionary phase thickness 0.25 µm; helium flow rate 1.3 mL/min;
temperature program: 50 °C for 3 min, then 15 °C/min till 260 °C,
and maintain this temperature for 8 min; injector: 200 °C; detector:
250 °C. GC retention times and mass spectra:
Similar calculations were carried out for the phenyl de-
rivatives 2c, 3c and 4c and the corresponding transition
states TS1c, TS2c and TS3c. At the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level
we found TS1c (phenyloxazirene Ǟ PhNCO, 14.7 kcal/
mol), and TS2c (phenyloxazirene Ǟ PhOCN, 19.3 kcal/
mol). At the HF/6-31G(d.p) level, TS2c was at 20.5 kcal/
mol, but all efforts to locate TS1c failed at this level. At the
CASSCF(8,8) level, TS2c was 17.6 kcal/mol above TS1c.
Thus, in spite of some quantitative differences and failure
to locate some transition states at all attempted levels of
theory, all the computations agree that the barrier for cya-
nate formation is significantly higher than the one for isocy-
anate formation. This explains the absence of cyanate for-
mation in the thermal Curtius rearrangement. It should be
pointed out that all the calculations pertain to the ground
state energy surface, whereas the photochemical rearrange-
ments are likely to take place on excited state surfaces.
TS3c, the transition state for isocyanate-cyanate re-
arrangement, was computed to lie close to TS2c in energy,
at 20.1 kcal/mol above the ozazirene structure 2c (94 kcal/
mol above the isocyanate PhNCO) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d)
level. The cyanate was 31 kcal/mol less stable than the iso-
cyanate at this level. Experimentally, it is known that alkyl
cyanates rearrange thermally to alkyl isocyanates, but aryl
cyanates do not rearrange to aryl isocyanates.[9]
Authentic samples: Phenyl cyanate: Rt = 7.28 min, MS [m/z (rel.
int. %)]: 120 (4), 119 (49), 92 (2), 91 (17), 78 (7), 77 (100), 75 (3),
74 (4), 65 (6), 64 (5), 63 (4), 51 (27), 50 (12). Phenyl isocyanate: Rt
= 6.18 min, MS [m/z (rel. int. %)]: 120 (9), 119 (100), 92 (4), 91
(43), 77 (1), 74 (3), 65 (6), 64 (28), 63 (12), 62 (4), 61 (2), 60(4),
52(3), 51 (6), 50 (6).
Samples collected after matrix isolation: Phenyl cyanate: Rt
=
7.28 min, MS [m/z (rel. int. %)]: 120 (9), 119 (56), 91 (14), 78 (13),
77 (100), 65 (11), 63 (8), 57 (47), 51 (53), 50 (24). Phenyl isocyanate:
Rt = 6.18 min, MS [m/z (rel. int. %)]: 120 (8), 119 (100), 92 (4), 91
(50), 90 (3), 77 (2), 74 (3), 65 (7), 64 (34), 63 (13), 62 (4), 59 (5), 51
(7), 50 (6). Integration of GC peak areas: First run (rel. integrated
area): PhOCN 0.48, PhNCO 41.19, ratio 1:85. Second run: PhOCN
0.20, PhNCO 17.13, ratio 1:86. Third run: PhOCN 0.25, PhNCO
During a search for a concerted pathway from the azide
to the cyanate, 1 Ǟ 4, we found instead a carbene interme-
diate, RO–C–N3, formed from the azide HCON3 (1a) with
a barrier of 81.4 kcal/mol, and from the azide PhCON3 (1c)
with a barrier of 95.9 kcal/mol. These carbenes decompose 21.00, ratio 1:84.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 4521–4524
© 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
4523