J. Gui et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 2681–2683
2683
3. (a) Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T. Ionic Liquid in Synthesis;
Wiley-VCH & CoKGaA: Germay, 2002; (b) Wierzbicki,
A.; Davis, J. H. Proceedings of the Symposium on Advances
in Solvent Selection and Substitution for Extraction, 5–9
March 2000. AIChE: New York, 2000.
4. Peng, J.; Deng, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 403–405.
5. Ren, R. X.; Zueva, L.; Qu, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
8441–8443.
e-caprolactam could be easily separated from the reac-
tion mixture by water extraction. We believe it is the first
example of an easy separation of e-caprolactam in ionic
liquids. The reaction mixture was extracted thrice with
water (5 mL · 3) after the reaction (Table 1, entry 3) to
give e-caprolactam at a total yield of 83%. This product
contains a very small amount of TISC due to the TISC
having a 0.86 g/100 mL in water.9 It is no doubt that a
further refine of the primary product is needed. The
remaining TISC was vacuumized for 2 h at 100 ꢁC, in
hoping that it could be used for another cycle. Repeat-
ing the Beckmann rearrangement reaction of cyclo-
hexanone oxime with the recycled TISC under the same
reaction conditions gives, however, a remarkable drop
of conversion (34%). In order to study the change of
TISC during the process, the pH value of the extractive
water (the first 5 mL) was examined. The pH value of 4.7
indicated that some TISC was transformed into sulfonic
acid in the reaction. The mechanism study is now
undergoing.
6. A typical procedure: 9.5 g (34.8 mmol) compound A and
5.67 g (34.8 mmol) NH4PF6 (commercial grade) were dis-
solved in 30 mL water. The mixture was stirred for 24 h at
room temperature. The upper aqueous phase was decanted
and the ionic liquid was washed several times with 10 mL
water, up to the point where the washing water was
chloride-free (tested with AgNO3). The residual water was
removed under vacuum for 6–8 h at 100 ꢁC and 10.0 g
(26.1 mmol) of the dark brown ionic liquid was obtained,
which corresponds to 75% of the theoretical yield. NMR
spectrum of the ionic liquid recorded on a Bruker AM-400:
1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6); d ¼ 8:94 (s, 1H), 7.53 (s,
1H), 7.45 (s, 1H), 4.23 (t, J ¼ 7, 2H), 4.12 (q, J ¼ 7, 2H),
2.82 (t, J ¼ 7:8, 2H), 2.10–2.21 (m, 2H), 1.46 (t, J ¼ 7, 3H).
Furthermore, the thermal decomposition point of the ionic
liquid was determined by TGA (Perkin–Elmer TGA Pyris1
instrument, 10 ꢁC minꢁ1 heating rate under nitrogen) to be
235 ꢁC.
In conclusion, TISC has demonstrated to be a suitable
catalyst for catalytic Beckmann rearrangement. Owing
to the good solubility of e-caprolactam in water and the
immiscibility of TISC with water, e-caprolactam could
be extracted by water. This offers an attractive route for
e-caprolactam manufacturing. To our knowledge, this
should be the first report concerning the Beckmann
rearrangement of cyclohexanone oxime in TSILs under
mild conditions and without any additional organic
solvents and an easy separation of product.
€
7. (a) Wasserscheid, P.; Van Hal, R.; Bosmann, A. Green
Chem. 2002, 4, 400–404; (b) To confirm the hydrolysis
stability of TISC, 5 g of TISC and 5 g of water were heated
to 80 ꢁC. Sample was taken at 15 min intervals and the pH
value of the solution was checked with a pH indicator from
Shanghai. No decrease of pH value was determined during
6 h, indicating that TISC did not hydrolyze.
8. Yoshizawa, M.; Hirao, M.; Ito-Akita, K.; Ohno, H. J.
Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 1057–1062.
9. (a) Chun, S.; Dzyuba, S. V.; Bartsch, R. A. Anal. Chem.
2001, 73, 3737–3741; (b) Solubility in water: In a 10 mL
polypropylene centrifuge tube, 1.00 g of the TISC and
2.5 mL of deionized water were shaken on a vortex mixer
for 30 min and centrifuged for 20 min. A 10 lL aliquot of
the aqueous phase was removed with a microsyringe and
diluted to 2.5 mL with deionized water. The absorbance of
this solution at 211 nm was measured by UV–vis spectro-
photometer (Perkin–Elmer Lamda 900) and compared with
that obtained from dissolving a weighed amount (1–9 mg)
of the TISC in 2.5 mL of deionized water.
References and notes
1. Izumi, Y.; Sato, S.; Urabe, K. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1649.
2. (a) Ichihashi, H.; Kitamura, M. Catalysis Today 2002, 73,
23–28; (b) Chandrasekhar, S.; Gopalaiah, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 2455–2457; (c) Chandrasekhar, S.; Gopal-
aiah, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 577–755.