for the bridgehead hydrogens, which slowly diminished at
the expense of one newer signal at δ 4.14 as C2-symmetric
dianion 8 appeared. The configuration of 8 is tentatively
assigned as trans simply on electrostatic grounds. That ring
opening had not occurred was clear from the fact that
acidification caused immediate disappearance of the bridge-
head peak for 8 and more slowly the pair of peaks for 7,
returning the starting material. The negative charges in
adducts 7 and 8 must enjoy considerable stabilization by the
geminal heteroatoms, through both inductive electron with-
drawal and negative hyperconjugation. Thus, generation of
7 and 8 is driven by the fact that they are weaker bases than
methoxide, and after acidification that driving force is gone.9
Cleavage of 6 to diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane 9 occurred only
after long heating at higher temperatures.
B3LYP/6-31G* structure of the hydrate 11 of urazole 4
(Figure 1).11 The crystal structure of urazole 6 reveals a
similar degree of pyramidalization.12
The unsaturated adduct 4 disappears with pseudo-first-
order rate constant k ) 2 × 10-3 s-1 at 50 °C in 3:1 CD3-
OD/CD3SOCD3, 2 M in KOH.10 It reacts about 10 times
faster than 6 under these conditions. A pair of bridgehead
signals at δ 4.94 and 4.89 corresponding to CD3O- adduct
1
10 are detectable in the H NMR spectrum during the
reaction. In contrast to the behavior of 7, 10 fragments readily
via what we believe to be the fully concerted process depicted
in Scheme 2.
Figure 1.
Normal hydrolysis or alcoholysis of a urazole ring,
producing a hydrazine, leaves the carbonyl carbons in the
+IV oxidation state. In this case, oxidation occurs at nitrogen
with the result that a carbonyl carbon is reduced to the +II
oxidation state. The fact that alcoholysis of 4 is far easier
than that of its saturated counterpart 6 indicates that the
concerted fragmentation enjoys significant driving force.
Barton et al. recovered ergosterol (13) from its adducts
with triazolinediones (12) upon treatment with KOH in
Scheme 2
This transformation actually comprises two linked con-
certed events, fragmentation of the heterocyclic ring and
retro-Diels-Alder reaction. They are made energetically
feasible by the simultaneous formation of both π bonds of
the very stable molecular nitrogen. Whereas the newly
forming carbonyl bond is poorly aligned to stabilize the
negative charge developing on nitrogen, the phenyl ring may
play that role. Alternatively, covalent bonding to a hydrogen-
bonded deuteron may occur as the charge develops at
nitrogen. Formation of the mutually perpendicular N-N π
bonds is facilitated by the fact that the nitrogen atoms are
already pyramidalized in the ground state, as shown in the
ethanol.13 They suggested that the reaction proceeds with
formation of a diimide, as shown in Scheme 3. This pathway
(11) Gaussian 98, Revision A.5; Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.;
Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratman, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam,
J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.;
Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman,
J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.;
Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.;
Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian,
Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(8) For examples of stable “hemiketals” and hydrates formed from
structurally related carbonyl groups, see: Addink, R.; Berends, W.
Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 833. Yakushijin, K.; Suzuki, R.; Kawaguchi, N.;
Tsuboi, Y.; Furukawa, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1986, 34, 2049. Goerlitzer,
K.; Buss, D. Arch. Pharm. 1985, 318, 97. Capuano, L.; Lazik, W.; Zander,
R. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 3237. Tanaka, F. S.; Hoffer, B. L.; Wien, R. G.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 1988, 36, 180. Barr, D. A.; Grigg, R.; Gunaratne, H.
Q. N.; Kemp, J.; McMeekin, P.; Sridharan, V. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 557.
(9) Consistent with this finding are calculations of the free energy of
addition of water across, and of hydroxide ion to, the carbonyl group of a
simple amide. In this case, both processes are thermodynamically unfavor-
able, but hydroxide addition to give the “hemiketal” anion is considerably
less so. Guthrie, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3608.
(12) van der Ende, C.; Offereins, B.; Romers, C. Acta Crystallogr. 1974,
B30, 1947.
(13) Barton, D. H. R.; Lusinchi, X.; Ramirez, J. S. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
1985, 849. Barton, D. H. R.; Shioiri, T.; Widdowson, D. A. J. Chem. Soc.
C 1971, 1968.
(10) The p-nitro analogue of 4 reacts somewhat faster. In the same
medium but at 30 °C, its pseudo-first-order rate constant k is 1 × 10-3 s-1
.
3838
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 21, 2004