38
X. Wu et al. / Carbohydrate Research 358 (2012) 37–39
A pre-determined amount of cellulose was first added into the
than Fe2O3, CuO, and TiO2 possibly due to good solubility of PMA and
FeCl3 in methanol. Amberlyst 35W (A-35W) exhibited strong cata-
lytic activity because of the high density of the SO3H group in its
structure. The synthesis of dimethyl ether could be accelerated un-
der acid catalysis. Heteropolyacids and solid acids were more effec-
tive at catalyzing the dimethyl ether formation due to their Lewis
acidity, allowing them to easily accept the lone pair electron in the
nucleophilic oxygen atom in methanol.14 With the formation of
more dimethyl ether, the reactor pressure also increased, especially
when the reactor was cooled down because of decreased dimethyl
ether solubility in methanol.
batch reactor, followed by 10 mL of methanol solution containing
a certain amount of acid catalyst. The reactor was then sealed
and put into steel box furnace for pre-selected condition. These
experiments took place under the methanol saturation vapor pres-
sure at each reaction temperature. After a pre-set reaction time
period (allow extra reactor heating up time of 20 min), the reactor
was removed from the furnace and immediately placed in water to
quench the reaction.
An Agilent 1790 GC and an Agilent 6890 GC/5973 MSD were
used in quantifying the liquid samples from the cellulose catalytic
alcoholysis process. GC operation conditions were as follows: col-
Based on above analysis, both sulfuric acid and p-toluenesul-
fonic acid were very good catalysts for the cellulose alcoholysis
process. Sulfuric acid was inexpensive, therefore it was selected
as the catalyst of cellulose alcoholysis for further study.
umn with FFAP 30 m  0.32 mm  0.4
lm; Column temperature
at 90 °C; Inject temperature at 200 °C; Detector temperature at
200 °C. Quantification was achieved by comparing the peak area
to that of the internal standard, n-octanol. Reaction products were
identified through comparison of individual retention time with
those pure compounds’ standard solutions, and further confirmed
with GC–MS (Agilent 6890 GC/5973 MSD).
3.2. Kinetics study on cellulose alcoholysis to MLA
Microcrystalline cellulose is insoluble in methanol at room tem-
perature, so mass transfer resistance has a significant impact on
this solid–liquid reaction. However, production rates of MLA were
similar at different initial concentrations at a reaction temperature
of 170 °C and a sulfuric acid concentration of 0.02 mol/L (Fig. 2).
The results suggested that cellulose was rapidly decomposed to
methylated cellotriose, methylated cellobiose, and other oligosac-
charides which possessed a certain degree of solubility in methanol
at high temperature.4 Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the influence of sul-
furic acid concentration and reaction temperature on MLA yield,
respectively. The results showed the production rate and equilib-
rium yield (the average of almost invariant yields) of MLA were
dependent on sulfuric acid concentration and reaction tempera-
ture. As sulfuric acid concentration increased, equilibrium yield in-
creased from 27% (0.02 mol/L) to 32% (0.03 mol/L). In addition, the
equilibrium yield increased by 17% when the temperature rose
from 170 °C to 180 °C, which indicated the reaction temperature
had a more significant effect on the production of MLA than sulfu-
ric acid concentration. The highest MLA yield (55%) was achieved
at 190 °C for 5 h using 0.02 mol/L H2SO4 as the alcoholysis catalyst.
A literature survey4,8 indicated the cellulose decomposition
mechanism in near-critical methanol consists of two steps: the
conversion of cellulose to methyl-glucopyranoside by methylation,
followed by the degradation to MLA with the acid catalysis. To
determine which step is the rate limiting step, separate glucose
alcoholysis experiments were carried out at 170 °C with sulfuric
acid concentration of 0.02 mol/L. The results indicated that glucose
was completely consumed in near-critical methanol within the
first 10 min, and the reaction product was mainly methyl-glucopy-
ranoside. Therefore, the glucose alcoholysis process can be
The yield of MLA was calculated by the following formula: MLA
yield (%) = amount of the MLA (mol) produced/amount of C6H10O5
units in cellulose (mol) Â 100%.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalytic activity of acid catalyst on alcoholysis of cellulose
Degradation of cellulose to small molecular compounds is an
acid-catalyzed process.7,8 Under a reaction temperature of 180 °C,
a reaction time of 4 h, and without using catalyst, an MLA yield
of only 3% was observed. The catalytic performances of various di-
lute inorganic and organic acids were tested. These acids included
sulfuric acid (H2SO4), p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA), phosphoric
acid (H3PO4), formic acid, and acetic acid, all with [H+] at
0.04 mol/L. Figure 1 shows the effect of inorganic and organic acid
catalysts on MLA yield. The results suggested that H2SO4 and PTSA
provided a significant MLA yield increase (both over 40%), while
only 7% yield was achieved by using H3PO4 as catalyst. The reason
is probably the relatively stronger acidity (pKa) of H2SO4 and PTSA
contributing to their higher catalytic activity.8 On the other hand,
the organic acids, such as formic acid and acetic acid were not that
effective as catalysts in cellulose catalytic alcoholysis process. It
has been reported that subsidiary reaction of acids esterification
with methanol at high temperature was the main reason.13
Several types of heteropolyacids and solid acids with a concen-
tration of 10 g/L were also examined and the results are summarized
in Figure 1. From the data, we concluded that phosphomolybdic acid
hydrate (PMA) and ferric trichloride (FeCl3) were much more active
60
50
40
35
30
25
20
30
20
15
10
20
10
5
30
10
0
10(GLU)
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Time, min
Figure 2. Effect of initial microcrystalline cellulose concentration (g/L) on MLA
Figure 1. Effect of different acid catalysts on MLA yield.
yield.