Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Communication
cyanidins. Model experiments and computational studies vali-
dated the high regiochemical selectivity in annulation reac-
tions. Biological studies using synthetic dimers are currently
in progress.
Fig. 4 DFT calculations on the Wheland intermediate.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant
Numbers JP16H06351, JP16H04107, JP18H04391 and Nagase
Science Technology Foundation.
Notes and references
Fig. 5 Origin of C8 regioselectivity.
1
(a) A. B. Bohm, Introduction to Flavonoids, Harwood
Academic, Amsterdam, 1998; (b) Plant Polyphenols 2:
Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacology, Ecology, ed. G. G. Gross,
R. W. Hemingway, T. Yoshida and S. J. Branham, Kluwer
Academic/Plenum, New York, 1999; (c) Flavonoids:
Chemistry, Biochemistry and Applications, ed. Ø. M.
Andersen and K. R. Markham, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis,
Boca Raton, 2006.
on the putative Wheland intermediates 32 and 33, generated
+
by the reaction on the model substrate 28 with “CH
3
”
suggested that the C8-methyl intermediate 32 is energetically
preferred over the C6-counterpart 33, in line with the preferred
C8 substitution rather than the C6 substitution (Fig. 4).
2
0a
To gain further insight, we addressed LUMO maps
the NBOs
and
2
0b
of 32 and 33 (Fig. 5). The LUMO maps identified
2 (a) K. Weinges, W. Kaltenhäuser, H.-D. Marx, E. Nader,
F. Nader, J. Perner and D. Seiler, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem.,
1968, 711, 184; (b) G.-I. Nonaka, S. Morimoto, J.-I. Kinjo,
T. Nohara and I. Nishioka, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1987, 35,
149; (c) K. Weinges, K. Göritz and F. Nader, Justus Liebigs
Ann. Chem., 1968, 715, 164; (d) D. Jacques, E. Haslam,
G. R. Bedford and D. Greatbanks, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1974, 2663.
3 (a) T. D. Bruyne, L. Pieters, H. Deelstra and A. Vlietinck,
Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 1999, 27, 445; (b) D.-Y. Xie and
R. A. Dixon, Phytochemistry, 2005, 66, 2127; (c) F. He,
Q.-H. Pan, Y. Shi and C.-Q. Duan, Molecules, 2008, 13, 3007;
(d) X. Xu, H. Xie, Y. Wang and X. Wei, J. Agric. Food Chem.,
2010, 58, 11667; (e) H. Zhang, Yerigui, Y. Yang and C. Ma,
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2013, 61, 8814.
4 (a) Y. Ito, K. Ohmori and K. Suzuki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2014, 53, 10129; (b) Y. Noguchi, R. Takeda, K. Suzuki and
K. Ohmori, Org. Lett., 2018, 20, 2857; (c) K. Ohmori,
N. Ushimaru and K. Suzuki, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
2004, 101, 12002; (d) K. Ohmori, T. Shono, Y. Hatakoshi,
T. Yano and K. Suzuki, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50,
4862.
C5 for 32 and C8a for 33 as the most electron-deficient sites,
which correspond to the para positions to the methyl-bonded
carbons. The NBO analyses showed both of these sites accept
significant electron donation from the adjacent oxygen atoms
(see C5–O5 for 32 and C8a–O1 for 33), which stand in contrast
to the weaker interactions of other C–O bonds.
Implication from these aspects is that both 32 and 33 are
best expressed by canonical structures I and II, in which one
could find a common local structure of a 1,3,5-trioxy-substi-
tuted pentadienyl cation, sharing a localized cation at a central
carbon center that is stabilized not only by the two CvC
bonds, but also by a strong n → p conjugation.
Although the electronic and orbital parameters are virtually
the same in I and II, we noticed a notable difference in the
molecular shape. Namely, the bicyclic skeleton in II is sizably
distorted, presumably for paying the cost of localizing a CvC
bond at the exo position (C4a–C5) to the pyran ring, while the
shape of I appears to be free from such constraints. We believe
this is the origin of the energy difference of 32 and 33, which
2
1
in turn would explain the C8/C6-regioslectivity.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the direct syntheses
of the doubly linked OPAs, procyanidins A1 (1) and A2 (2) in
five steps from commercially available starting materials. This
approach significantly simplifies the synthetic procedure, side-
stepping the selective protection of synthetically indistinguish-
able phenols on the nucleophilic flavan unit, and it could be
employed for the synthesis of various doubly linked proantho-
5 S. Stadlbauer, K. Ohmori, F. Hattori and K. Suzuki, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 8425.
6 (a) A. J. Birch, J. W. Clark-Lewis and A. V. Robertson,
J. Chem. Soc., 1957, 3586; (b) P. Kiatgrajai, J. D. Wellons,
L. Gollob and J. D. White, J. Org. Chem., 1982, 47, 2910;
(c) P. P. Mehta and W. E. Whalley, J. Chem. Soc., 1963, 5327;
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2019, 17, 9129–9134 | 9133