Dynamics of Bond-Breaking in Ion Radicals
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 40, 1997 9539
anion radical before having time to diffusing back and being
reduced at the electrode surface. For these reasons, this
“disproportionation” or internal redox catalysis mechanism
occurs with trifluoro derivatives bearing electron-withdrawing
groups on the aromatic moiety. Conversely, an “ECE” mech-
anism, where the defluorinated intermediate being formed close
to the electrode surface undergoes an electrode electron transfer,
occurs with trifluoro derivatives bearing an electron-donating
substituent or no substituent at all as well as with the difluoro
derivatives.
3. The variations of the cleavage reactivity with the number
of fluorines on the functional carbon and with the structure of
the aromatic moiety were derived from cyclic voltammetric and/
or redox catalysis experiments. They could be successfully
rationalized by the intramolecular dissociative electron transfer
model. Application of the model involves relating both the
driving force (the opposite of the standard free energy of the
reaction) and its intrinsic barrier to structural and medium factors
in the reactants and products.
4. The rate of anion radical cleavage increases rapidly from
the trifluoro to the difluoro and to the monofluoro derivative.
In terms of driving force, an important factor is the standard
potential for the generation of the anion radical (E0) which
measures the LUMO energy. The higher the later factor, the
larger the driving force, and thus, the faster the reaction. The
acceleration of the reaction indeed parallels a shift of the
standard potential in the negative direction. This is however
insufficient to account quantitatively for the magnitude of the
acceleration. One should take into account the variation of
another factor, namely the homolytic bond dissociation energy
of the starting molecule (D) which decreases as the number of
fluorines diminishes. This is a second reason why the driving
force increases from 3 to 2 and to 1 fluorines. This factor also
influences the intrinsic barrier, which decreases as the number
of fluorines diminishes. On total, the activation free energy
correlates, as predicted by the intramolecular dissociative
electron transfer model, with E0/2 + 3D/4. This correlation
implies that the sum of the other ingredients of the intrinsic
barrier remains constant in the series. This constancy derives
from the approximate constancy of the solvent reorganization
energy and from the fact that the variations of the standard
potentials for the formation of the anion radical and for the
oxidation of the defluorinated carbanion compensate each other
while shifting in the negative direction upon passing from 3 to
2 and to 1 fluorines.
5. The standard potential for the formation of the anion
radical of the trifluoro derivatives varies substantially upon
changing the aryl moiety. This is the main factor which makes
the cleavage rate constant vary in the series through the ensuing
variation of the driving force. The bond dissociation energy
of the starting molecule also interferes both in the driving force
and in the intrinsic barrier. This is the reason that the presence
of an electron-withdrawing substituent, when located in a
resonant interacting position with the CF3 group, accelerates
the cleavage reaction by means of the attending weakening of
the C-F bond.
mately the same in both solvents results from the compensation
of two effects. Passing from DMF to liquid NH3 shifts the
standard potentials for the formation of the anion radical and
for the oxidation of the defluorinated carbanion both in the
positive direction; the later more than the former because the
negative charge it bears is concentrated over a smaller volume.
The resulting decrease of the intrinsic barrier is however
compensated by an increase of the contribution of solvent
reorganization.
Experimental Section
Cyclic Voltammetry. In liquid NH3, the working electrode was a
0.5 mm-diameter gold disk, frequently polished with alumina.
A
platinum wire was used as counter electrode, and the reference electrode
was a 0.01 M Ag+/Ag electrode.19a The potentiostat, equipped with a
positive feedback compensation and current measurer,19b was used
together with a function generator (Tacussel TPPRT), a storage
oscilloscope (Nicolet), and an X-Y recorder (Sefram TGM164). The
cyclic voltammetry experiments were run in an electrochemical cell19c
filled with 80 mL of liquid ammonia, and potassium bromide was used
as supporting electrolyte. The temperature was maintained at -38 °C
with a cryostat (Bioblock Scientific).
In DMF, the working electrodes were 1 or 3 mm diameter carbon
disks. They were carefully polished and ultrasonically rinsed with
ethanol before each voltammogram. The counter electrode was a
platinum wire and the reference electrode an aqueous SCE electrode.
The potentiostat, function generator, and recorders were the same as
above. The experiments were carried out at 20 °C in an electrochemical
cell equipped with a double-wall jacket allowing circulation of water
filled with 5 mL of DMF and n-Bu4NBF4 as supporting electrolyte.
Chemicals. N,N′-Dimethylformamide (Fluka puriss absolute) and
the supporting electrolyte n-Bu4NBF4 (Fluka puriss) were used as
received.
All trifluoro compounds, with the exception of 5 and 6, were
purchased from Aldrich or Maybridge.
5 was prepared according to literature20a from the corresponding
benzoic acid chloride and t-BuOH. A white solid is obtained after
separation of the reacting mixture is separated on a silica column. with
a 70-30 cyclohexane-dichloro methane mixture as eluant. Yield:
1
56%; H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.62 (s, 9 H), 7.71-8.14 (AA′BB′, JAB
)
9Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 28.1 (CH3), 80.8 (C), 123.5 (CF3, q,
JCF ) 272 Hz), 125.3 (CH, q, JCF ) 4 Hz), 129.8 (CH), 133.2 (C),
134.3 (C, q, JCF ) 32.5 Hz), 165.7 (C).
6 was prepared in situ by addition of a stoichiometric quantity of
t-BuOK to the acid.
To obtain 1′′,20b a mixture of 4-cyanobenzaldehyde (5 mmol) and
diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (5.2 mmol) was heated carefully till the
start of the exothermic reaction. It was then maintained at 60 °C for
30 min. The resultant mixture was dissolved in dichloromethane (15
mL), and the solution was poured into ice (20 mL) to remove the
diethylamino-N-sulfinyl fluoride formed in the reaction. The organic
layer is dried with magnesium sulfate. The products are eluted with
dichloromethane on a silica column. A pale yellow liquid is obtained
1
after evaporation of the eluant. Yield: 79%; H NMR (CD3COCD3)
δ 6.70 (t, JHF ) 56 Hz, 1 H), 7.65-7.78 (AA′BB′, JAB ) 8.3 Hz, 4 H);
MS: m/z 153 (M), 152 (M - 1), 134, 103.
To prepare 1′,20c 5.5 mmol of 4-bromomethylbenzonitrile were added
to 10 mL of a THF solution of NBu4F (1 M). The mixture was stirred
under an inert atmosphere at ambient temperature during 20 h. The
resultant mixture was poured in pentane (15 mL) and washed 3 times
with water (10 mL). The organic layer was dried with magnesium
sulfate, and the products separated on a silica column with CH2Cl2 as
eluant). A pale yellow liquid was finally obtained (mp ≈ 25 °C).
6. The activation free energy of cleavage is smaller in liquid
NH3 at -38 °C than in DMF at room temperature. This
difference in reactivity is essentially of thermodynamic origin.
It derives from a better solvation by NH3 (H-bonding solvent)
than by DMF (non H-bonding solvent). In both solvent the
major contribution to the intrinsic barrier comes from the nuclear
reorganization attending the intramolecular dissociative electron
transfer. However solvent reorganization is far from negligible.
Its contribution to the intrinsic barrier is ca. one-third of the
total. The fact that the intrinsic barrier free energy is approxi-
(19) (a) Herlem, M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 1687. (b) Garreau, D.;
Save´ant, J.-M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1972, 35, 309. (c) Combellas, C.; Lu,
Y.; Thie´bault, A. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1993, 23, 841.
(20) (a) Furniss, B. S.; Hannaford, A. J.; Smith, P. W. G.; Tatchell, A.
R. Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Longman,
Ed.; Essex UK, 1989; pp 1073-1081. (b) Markovskij, L. N.; Pashinnik,
V., E.; Kirsanov A. V. Synthesis 1973, 787. (c) Cox, D. P.; Terpinski, J.;
Lawrynowicz, W. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3216.