Mendeleev Commun., 2018, 28, 261–263
[Cu], [MNu], MeCN
room temperature
provides the opportunity to carry out reactions for anilines in the
one-pot mode.
–
ArN NBF4
ArNu
Nu = Br, SCN
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for
Basic Research (grant no. 15-03-01995) and the Russian Science
Foundation (grant no. 14-23-001866P). The XPS study was
supported by the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Development Program.
Isolated yield (%)
Ar
ArBr
ArSCN
94
95
87
97
95
88
89
82
96
92
3-Me-4-BrC6H3
3,5-Cl2C6H3
4-MeOC6H4
3-Me-4-NO2C6H3
4-IC6H4
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi: 10.1016/j.mencom.2018.05.010.
Scheme 5 Reagents and conditions: [MNu] (6 mmol), catalyst IV (0.025 mol
%
of copper), MeCN (20 ml), Ar, stirring for 5 min (in case of ArSCN, the
mixture was cooled to 0°C); then diazonium salt (3 mmol) in MeCN (10 ml)
and stirring for 1 h.
References
ButONO, BF3, [Cu], LiBr or Et4NCl
ArNH2
ArHal
1 H. H. Hodgson, Chem. Rev., 1947, 40, 251.
2 J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 2942.
MeCN, 0–20°C
Isolated yield (%)
ArCl ArBr
3 H. Zollinger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1978, 17, 141.
4 H. Zollinger, Acc. Chem. Res., 1973, 6, 335.
Ar
5 C. Galli, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 765.
6 J.-J. Dai, C. Fang, B. Xiao, J. Yi, J. Xu, Z.-J. Liu, X. Lu, L. Liu and
Y. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 8436.
7 A. Hubbard, T. Okazaki and K. K. Laali, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 316.
8 C. Matheis, V. Wagner and L. J. Goossen, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22, 79.
9 G. Danoun, B. Bayarmagnai, M. F. Grünberg and L. J. Goossen, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7972.
4-FC6H4
4-AcOC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
3-Me-4-BrC6H3
3-Me-4-NO2C6H3
2-Br-4-Me-5-ClC6H2
–
82
95
80
88
94
96
93
77
90
96
92
Scheme 6 Reagents and conditions: BF3·Et2O (3 mmol), aniline (3 mmol),
nucleophile (6 mmol), catalyst IV (0.025 mol% of copper), MeCN, 0°C,
stirring for 10 min; then ButONO (4.5 mmol) in MeCN (20 ml) and stirring
for 1 h.
10 P. Nikolaienko and M. Rueping, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22, 2620.
11 A. S. Sigeev, I. P. Beletskaya, P. V. Petrovskii andA. S. Peregudov, Russ.
J. Org. Chem., 2012, 48, 1055 (Zh. Org. Khim., 2012, 48, 1059).
12 I. P. Beletskaya, A. S. Sigeev, A. S. Peregudov and P. V. Petrovskii,
Synthesis, 2007, 2534.
13 D. Yin, Y. He, M. A. Perera, S. S. Hong, C. Marhefka, N. Stourman,
L. Kirkovsky, D. D. Miller and J. T. Dalton, Mol. Pharmacol., 2003,
63, 211.
14 J. Goldberg, Q. Jin, Y. Ambroise, S. Satoh, J. Desharnais, K. Capps and
D. L. Boger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 544.
15 Supported Ionic Liquids. Fundamental andApplications, eds. R. Fehrmann,
A. Riisager and M. Haumann, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2014.
16 V. M. Zelikman, I. G. Tarkhanova and E. V. Khomyakova, Kinet. Catal.,
2012, 53, 222 (Kinet. Katal., 2012, 53, 232).
in high yields (Scheme 6). In contrast with previous results,11
a
steric hindrance did not have a significant effect on the product
yield even in the case of 2,6-substituted anilines. A methoxy
group (e.g. at para-position) at the aromatic ring led to decreased
product yield. The isolation of 4-fluorochlorobenzene was not
performed due to difficulties caused by its volatility. The yield
was 98% according to 19F NMR. This method is not applicable
to the aryl thiocyanates preparation due to the reaction between
the SCN− ion and ButONO.
17 V. M. Zelikman, I. G. Tarkhanova and A. K. Buryak, J. Mol. Catal. A.:
Chem., 2015, 407, 60.
The aryl halide production process could easily be performed
on a largescale. When the 3-methyl-4-bromophenyldiazonium
tetrafluoroborate amount in the reaction with LiBr was increased
from 1 to 50 mmol, 2,4-dibromotoluene was obtained in 89% yield.
Therefore, the fully recyclable heterogeneous catalyst with
the excellent activity (TOF = 3000–8000 h–1) has been developed,
which allows the Sandmeyer reaction to be accomplished for
several consecutive cycles. This catalyst contains comparable
amounts of cuprous and cupric chlorides. The reported method
18 C. Huang, B. Chen, J. Zhang, Z. Liu and Y. Li, Energy Fuels, 2004, 18,
1862.
19 I. P. Beletskaya, A. S. Sigeev, A. S. Peregudov and P. V. Petrovskii,
J. Organomet. Chem., 2004, 689, 3810.
20 I. P. Beletskaya and A. V. Cheprakov, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 3009.
Received: 6th December 2017; Com. 17/5426
– 263 –