When toluene was used as a solvent, the simple extraction of
the reaction mixture with n-perfluorooctane (2 3 5 ml) allowed
the complete removal of the fluorous ligand and of the
corresponding palladium complexes, as shown by the absence
of phosphine resonances in the 1H-NMR of the crude product.
As pointed out by Curran, this ease of separation together with
the possible use of standard reaction conditions could be helpful
in discovery-oriented synthesis and parallel synthesis.8 How-
ever, a drawback of this ‘light fluorous’ approach is the absence
of catalytic activity of the recovered fluorous palladium
complex. We are currently investigating this problem, which
seems to be due to the separation procedure followed. Indeed,
recyclability of a ‘light fluorous’ phosphine used in the same
reaction under classical fluorous biphase conditions was
feasible.14
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: Nucleophile (see Table 1), 2 eq.; BSA,
2 eq.; KOAc, 0.1 eq.; [Pd(h -C3H5)Cl]2, 2 mol%; (R)-(+)-1, 8 mol%.
3
CH3OH) were found to be 0.20, 0.23 and 7.42, respectively. As
expected, the new ligand shows a certain affinity for organic
solvents, due to the relatively low fluorine content of (R)-(+)-1
(52.4%) and to its aromatic backbone. This mixed behaviour
makes (R)-(+)-1 an ideal candidate for the application of ‘light
fluorous’ techniques. Palladium complexes of enantiopure
2-(diphenylphosphino)-2A-alkoxy-1,1A-binaphthyls (MOPs) cat-
alyse several asymmetric transformations.11 A number of
applications of related fluorous compounds could be thus
envisaged. It was previously shown that palladium(0)-catalysed
allylic substitution reactions can be conveniently performed
under fluorous biphase conditions, in the presence of a ‘light
fluorous’ triarylphosphine with a fluorine content of 57%.14 On
the other hand, chiral MOPs have been recently used for the
asymmetric allylic alkylation of 1,3-diphenylprop-2-enyl ace-
tate 10 in standard solvents (Scheme 2).15 We decided therefore
to investigate the potentiality of this new fluorous MOP (R)-
(+)-1 as a ligand in the same reaction. The results obtained are
summarized in Table 1.‡
We thank the Programme Galilée 1999 no. 99023 for
financial support.
Notes and references
† 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 4.16 (dt, J = 24.6 Hz, 12.6 Hz, 2H), 4.48
(dt, J = 13.1 Hz, 13.1 Hz, 4H), 6.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.86–6.92 (m, 3H),
7.03 (dd, J = 7.1 Hz, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.06–7.12 (m, 1H), 7.17–7.35 (m, 6H),
7.41 (dd, J = 3.0 Hz, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.86–7.91 (m, 3H),
8.01 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (75.4 MHz, CDCl3): 65.5 (t, J = 27
Hz), 66.7 (t, J = 27 Hz), 105–120 (m, C7F15), 124.9–131.4, 133.4–136.4,
140.7, 141.1, 153.0, 158.0, 158.2; 31P-NMR (122 MHz, CDCl3): 215.5; mp
= 49 °C, [a]20 = +23.1 (c 0.3, CHCl3). Anal. Calcd. for C56H26F45O3P:
Table 1 Asymmetric allylic alkylation of 1,3-diphenylprop-2-enyl acetate
D
in benzotrifluoride
C, 41.17; H, 1.61; P, 1.90. Found: C, 40.56; H, 1.53; P, 2.19%.
‡ Reactions were run under nitrogen in Schlenk glassware. [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
and the ligand (R)-(+)-1 was dissolved in 2 ml of solvent. After stirring for
40 min at rt, a solution of 10 in 2 ml of solvent was added. After 20 min, the
resulting solution was transferred into a reactor previously charged with
BSA, KOAc and the nucleophile dissolved in 4 ml of solvent. The reaction
mixture was stirred at the desired temperature for the time indicated in Table
1.
Yielda
(%)
Eea
(%)
Entry
Nucleophile
T/°C t/h
Conf.b
1
CH2(CO2Me)2
CH2(CO2Me)2
CH2(CO2Me)2
CH2(COCH3)2
MeCH(CO2Me)2
MeCH(CO2Me)2
AcNHCH(CO2Et)2
25
25
0
25
25
50
50
36
25
48
1
99
88
95
100
7
81
87
99
85
76
44
85
R
R
R
R
S
2c
3cd
4
5
6
7
48
48
25
1 Chemical Synthesis in Supercritical Fluids, ed. P. G. Jessop and W.
Leitner, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1999.
2 I. T. Horvàth and J. Ràbai, Science, 1994, 266, 72; I. T. Horváth, Acc.
Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 641.
3 R. S. Oakes, A. A. Clifford, K. D. Bartle, M. T. Pett and C. M Rayner,
Chem. Commun., 1999, 247.
4 E. G. Hope and A. M. Stuart, J. Fluorine Chem., 1999, 100, 75 and
references cited therein.
69
67
S
S
a Determined by HPLC analysis (column Chiralpak AD 0.46 3 25 cm).
b Determined by comparison with an authentic sample. c Reaction run in
toluene. d See ref. 15.
The reaction of 10 with dimethyl malonate using MOP (R)-
(+)-1 (8 mol%) and [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2 (2 mol%) in the presence of
bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (BSA, 2 eq.) and potassium acetate
(10.1 eq.) in benzotrifluoride (a standard solvent for ‘light
fluorous’ compounds) proceeded quantitatively at rt to give,
after 36 h, the corresponding alkylated product in 99% yield
with 81% ee (Table 1, entry 1). This value is quite close to the
value obtained using toluene as the solvent (Table 1, entry 2). It
is to be noticed that non-perfluorinated MOP gave the alkylated
product in 95% yield and 99% ee using toluene as the solvent
(Table 1, entry 3).
Next we investigated the asymmetric reaction with other
carbon nucleophiles. Reaction of 10 with acetylacetone gave the
product nearly quantitatively after 1 h with 85% ee (Table 1,
entry 4). Substituted dimethyl malonate gave lower chemical
yields. Dimethyl methylmalonate gave the alkylated product
with 69% yield and 44% ee at 50 °C (Table 1, entry 6), although
76% ee was obtained at rt, but in 7% yield (Table 1, entry 5).
Diethyl acetamidomalonate gave also the expected alkylated
compound in 67% yield with 85% ee (Table 1, entry 7).
5 M. Cavazzini, A. Manfredi, F. Montanari, S. Quici and G. Pozzi, Chem.
Commun., 2000, 2171 and references cited therein.
6 C. Rocaboy, D. Rutherford, B. L. Bennet and J. A. Gladysz, J. Phys.
Org. Chem., 2000, 13, 596.
7 D. P. Curran, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1175; D. Crich, X. Hao
and M. Lucas, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 14261.
8 Q. Zhang, Z. Luo and D. P. Curran, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 8866.
9 B. Richter, A. L. Spek, G. van Koten and B.-J. Deelman, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2000, 122, 3945 and references cited therein.
10 A. Klose and J. A. Gladysz, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 2665; G.
Franciò and W. Leitner, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1663; S. Kainz, A.
Brinkmann, W. Leitner and A. Pfaltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
6421.
11 T. Hayashi, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 576, 195 and references cited
therein.
12 F. G. Mann and E. J. Chaplin, J. Chem. Soc., 1937, 527.
13 D. Sinou, G. Pozzi, E. G. Hope and A. M. Stuart, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1999, 40, 849.
14 R. Kling, D. Sinou, G. Pozzi, A. Choplin, F. Quignard, S. Busch, S.
Kainz, D. Koch and W. Leitner, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 9439.
15 K. Fuji, H. Ohnishi, S. Moriyama, K. Tanaka, T. Kawabata and K.
Tsubaki, Synlett, 2000, 351.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1220–1221
1221