Please cite this article in press as: Petronikolou and Nair, Biochemical Studies of Mycobacterial Fatty Acid Methyltransferase: A Catalyst for the
quality, which allowed for nearly all of the main chain and roughly half of the
side chains to be automatically built using Buccaneer (Cowtan, 2006, 2008)
as implemented in the CCP4 suite of programs (Winn et al., 2011). Additional
cycles of manual rebuilding interspersed with crystallographic refinement us-
ing REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011) resulted in the final model. The final
cycles of model building and refinement were carried out against high-resolu-
tion data collected on native crystals of MmFAMT-SAH.
chased as enantiomeric mixtures. However, it is clear from the crystal struc-
ture of the enzyme complexed with SAH and 3-OH-C10 that the enzyme
utilizes only the S enantiomer (Figures 3C and S4). Subsequently, the enantio-
meric ratio was determined by Mosher ester analysis (Hoye et al., 2007), and
was found to be 1:1.
End-point Activity Assay
Cocrystal structures with bound ligands were all determined by molecular
replacement as implemented in the Phenix program suite (Adams et al.,
The activity of the wild-type enzyme for SA was investigated by GC-MS. 100-ml
reactions containing 50 mM wild-type MmFAMT, 500 mM SAH nucleosidase,
ꢂ
2
010), using the refined coordinates of SeMet MmFAMT as search model.
5 mM SAM, and 10 mM substrate were incubated at 37 C for 2 hr. The samples
The resultant solutions were subsequently used as starting models for
several rounds of automated model building using the ARP/wARP web
server (Winn et al., 2011; Murshudov et al., 2011; Langer et al., 2008), fol-
lowed by rounds of manual rebuilding using Coot (Emsley et al., 2010),
combined with crystallographic refinement using REFMAC5 (Murshudov
et al., 2011). Ligands were built in Coot, and water molecules were added
using the ARP/wARP solvent building software of the CCP4 suite (Lamzin
and Wilson, 1993), and confirmed by manual inspection. In all cases, the
quality of the in-progress model was routinely monitored using both
the free R factor (Read et al., 2011) and MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010) for
quality assurance.
were cleaned from the enzyme with a 10,000-Da molecular weight cutoff
Amicon spin filter, and analyzed by the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center
(University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign). All reactions were performed in
the same buffer used for kinetic analysis supplemented with 5% methanol
(final concentration). To confirm that methanol did not deactivate the enzyme
and that possible observed inactivity was not due to its addition, reactions
containing wild-type MmFAMT and C8 were included. Control reactions
without addition of the enzyme were also analyzed. Results are means ±
SEM of triplicate experiments.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry
The binding affinity of wild-type MmFAMT for SAM and SAH was measured at
ꢂ
2
5 C using a VP-ITC microcalorimeter (Microcal). Protein and ligands were in
Determination of Kinetic Parameters
the same buffer used for kinetic analysis. For binding of SAM, 1.1–1.15 mM
SAM was injected into the reaction cell containing 30–35 mM protein in 28 suc-
cessive aliquots at 300-s intervals and 20.5-s duration, with a reference power
of 2 mcal/s. For binding of SAH, 0.52–0.54 mM SAH was injected into the reac-
tion cell containing 40–42 mM protein in 28 successive aliquots at 240-s inter-
vals and 20.5-s duration, with a reference power of 6 mcal/s. All injections were
For all experiments, SAM was further purified by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) using a C18 column (Vydac; 5-mm particle size,
4.6 3 250 mm) and monitoring absorbance at 260 nm. The column was
washed for 30 min with solvent B (methanol with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid),
and equilibrated for 15 min with solvent A (water with 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid). SAM was injected into the column and a gradient elution was applied
as follows: wash with 5 ml of solvent A, elute with a linear gradient to a final
1
0 ml in volume, except for the first injection which was 4 ml and was excluded
from data analysis. The protein-ligand buffer was used in the reference cell,
and a titration of the ligand into just the buffer was subtracted from the mea-
surements. Non-linear regression with a single-site fitting model (MicroCal
Origin) was applied for data analysis, and the thermodynamic parameters
were calculated using the Gibbs free energy equation (DG = DH ꢀ TDS) and
2
0% of solvent B, and wash with 5 ml of solvent B. The flow rate was 1 ml/min
throughout the procedure. The fraction of SAM collected was subsequently
ꢂ
lyophilized and stored at ꢀ20 C. Fresh solution of SAM was prepared before
each experiment.
The kinetic parameters of the wild-type and mutant proteins were deter-
mined using a photospectrometric assay that monitors the production of
SAH (Dorgan et al., 2006; Wooderchak et al., 2008). All enzyme reactions
the relationship DG = ꢀRTlnK
a
. Results are means ± SEM of duplicate exper-
iments. For all binding experiments, freshly purified protein was used, and
commercial preparations of SAM were purified by HPLC as described above.
ꢂ
were performed in 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.8) and 300 mM KCl at 37 C, and
monitored at 265 nm for up to 20 min. Control reactions without addition of
the substrate were also included to take into account any background hydro-
lysis of SAM over time. For determination of the Michaelis-Menten parameters
of the wild-type enzyme and mutants for the fatty acids and 3-hydroxy fatty
acids, a 150-ml reaction volume contained the following components: 0.1–
Sequence Similarity Network
(
Gerlt et al., 2015) with the sequence of MmFAMT as the query for a BLASTP
2.0 mM MmFAMT, 1 mM SAH nucleosidase, 0.2 mM adenine deaminase,
mM MnSO , 80 mM SAM, and various concentrations of fatty acids and 3-hy-
1
4
amino acids were included for the subsequent generation of a network with
droxy fatty acids. For determination of the kinetic parameters for SAM, a 150-ml
reaction volume contained 0.2 mM MmFAMT, 1 mM SAH nucleosidase, 0.2 mM
ꢀ
30
E-values equal to or lower than 1 3 10 . This network was visualized using
Cytoscape 3.2.1 (Figure 5) (Shannon et al., 2003).
adenine deaminase, 1 mM MnSO
4
, 3 mM C8, and various concentrations of
and Vmax values
SAM. Based on the initial reaction rates, the apparent K
M
were determined using the Michaelis-Menten function of Origin (OriginLab).
Results are means ± SEM of triplicate experiments.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
For mutants with very increased K
the enzyme could not be achieved due to limited solubility of the substrates in
the reaction buffer. In these cases, the apparent K and Vmax values could not
be determined, but the kcat/ values were obtained by plotting the observed
M
values for C8 or 3-OH-C10, saturation of
M
K
M
rates (kobs) at four different substrate concentrations (Figure S5). For the Y24F
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
mutant, the kinetic parameters for SAM, and consequently for C8 and 3-OH-
C10, could not be determined, as the K
M
value increased such that saturation
We would like to thank the staff at Life Sciences Collaborative Access Team
(LS-CAT, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL) for facilitating data
collection, and Dr. Alexander Ulanov from the Metabolomics Center (Roy J.
Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) for
the GC-MS analysis. We would also like to thank Drs. Spencer Peck and Bijoy
Desai for helpful discussions about the kinetic studies.
of the enzyme could not be achieved due to limitations of the assay (concen-
tration of SAM used should be kept below 250 mM to remain in the linear range
of the spectrophotometer [Dorgan et al., 2006]).
To attest that the coupling enzymes were not rate limiting, the initial rates of
0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mM wild-type enzyme were determined by addition of 3 mM
C8. The means of the observed rates ± SEM were found to be the same (Fig-
ure S5A), indicating that the coupling enzymes are not rate limiting. Conse-
quently, the measured rate corresponds to the rate of MmFAMT.
Received: May 13, 2015
Revised: September 4, 2015
Accepted: September 24, 2015
Published: October 29, 2015
All substrates were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, except for the 3-OH-C8,
which was purchased from Matreya. The 3-hydroxy fatty acids were pur-
Chemistry & Biology 22, 1–11, November 19, 2015 ª2015 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
9