ENANTIOSELECTIVE HYDROGENATION
163
that the more flexible, nonplanar structure of 2 influences
both the adsorption on the Pt surface and the interaction
with the modifier. These examples demonstrate that
steric as well as electronic effects determine the enantio-
differentiation over the Pt–cinchona system.
The examples in Table 1 provide some information
concerning the substrate–modifier interaction during the
enantio-differentiating step. On the basis of the effect of
replacing toluene by acetic acid, the substrates may be di-
vided into two groups. In acetic acid the ee dropped dra-
matically in all reactions except in the hydrogenation of
5
, where the ee increased by 21% . It is not clear yet what
is the role of protonation of the quinuclidine N atom by
acetic acid in the substrate–modifier interactions. Another
intriguing observation is the unexpectedly high ee obtained
by replacing CD with MeOCD in the hydrogenation of 5.
For comparison, in the hydrogenation of �-ketoesters with
the same catalyst the difference between the ee’s obtained
in toluene or acetic acid, and with CD or MeOCD, was only
FIG. 2. Influence of the amount of modifier MeOCD on the enan-
tiomeric excess in the hydrogenation of 5 under standard conditions in
acetic acid.
2
–3% (14). Besides, ab initio calculations indicated that the
conformations of CD and MeOCD are similar (dominance
of “open 3” conformation (19)). It was proposed earlier
�
-diketones. The successful hydrogenation of 1 (9, 10)
and ketopantolactone (16) was the first piece of evidence
against this postulate, indicating that the real requirement
for the substrate is the presence of an electron-withdrawing
group in the � position. The recent highly enantioselec-
tive hydrogenation of �-ketoacetals (17, 18) provides ad-
ditional evidence in this direction.
The results in Table 1 allow further refinement con-
cerning the role of an electron-withdrawing group in the
substrate. Ethyl trifluoropyruvate 6 possesses two strong
electron-withdrawing groups on both sides of the carbonyl
group. Nevertheless, hydrogenation of this compound af-
forded very poor results. Hydrogen uptake ceased at mod-
erate conversion and the ee was very low. A possible reason
for this unexpected behavior is that the highly activated car-
bonyl compound reacts with the modifier, as evidenced by
(
9, 10, 13) that in the enantio-differentiating step the quin-
uclidine N atom of CD interacts with the O atom of the keto
carbonyl group of the substrate via a H bond (N–H–O-type
interaction), and the OH group of CD is not involved in this
interaction. The significant positive effect of replacing the
hydroxy group of CD by a methoxy group can be explained
by the importance of another type of substrate–modifier
interaction via the OH group which is competitive enough
to diminish the ee.
5
. CONCLUSIONS
The enantioselective hydrogenation of various trifluo-
romethyl ketones shown in this work demonstrates the po-
tential of cinchona-modified Pt for the synthesis of chiral-
fluorinated alcohols. Additional functional groups, such as
an ester function in the � position or amines, are not detri-
mental to enantio-differentiation. Hydrogenation of triflu-
oromethyl ketones represents a new example where up
to 90% ee can easily be achieved with a chirally modi-
fied metal hydrogenation catalyst. The poor ee’s obtained
with 3-phenyl-1,1,1-trifluoropropan-2-one (2) and 1,1,1-
trifluoroacetone (7) provide useful hints concerning the im-
portance of both electronic and steric effects in the enantio-
differentiating step. These observations, together with the
unexpectedly high effects of an acidic solvent and the pro-
tection of the OH group of CD, are good starting points for
future mechanistic studies.
1
13
NMR spectroscopy. The H-NMR and C-NMR spectra of
the mixture of 6 and CD could not be interpreted due to
19
overlapping of the signals, but the F signal of 6 at � 76 ppm
disappeared in favor of a new main peak at � 81.5 ppm.
When 2-propanol was used to mimick the secondary OH
function of CD, the rapid and complete conversion of 6 to
the corresponding hemiketal was confirmed by H-, C-
and 19F-NMR (with a � 76- to � 82-ppm shift in the latter
case). Apparently, the hemiketal of 6 and CD is a poor
modifier in the enantioselective hydrogenation of 6.
In case of 1,1,1-trifluoroacetone (7) the steric differ-
ence between the CH3 and the CF3 group is very small,
which can explain why the enantio-differentiation is so
moderate in this reaction. The structure of 3-phenyl-1,1,1-
trifluoropropan-2-one (2) is very similar to that of 1. The
only difference is an additional methylene group between
the carbonyl group and the aromatic ring in 2, which re-
sulted in a strong negative effect on the ee. It is assumed
1
13
REFERENCES
1. Soloshonok, V. A., Ed., “Enantiocontrolled Synthesis of Fluoro-
Organic Compounds.” Wiley, Chichester, 1999.