HIROSHI FUJIHISA et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 69, 214102 (2004)
The dissociation process has been precisely investigated
by a recent UV-visible-IR absorption measurement, and was
shown to be initiated photochemically or thermally by laser
irradiation above 24 GPa.21 The slope of −0.11 GPa/K indi-
cates that a temperature elevation of just 30 K above room
temperature decreases the dissociation pressure to 24 GPa.
Therefore we conclude that the dissociation is induced ther-
mally. It should be noted that all transitions of H2S including
the molecular dissociation did not depend on x-ray wave-
length, intensity, nor exposure time. Therefore the dissocia-
tion would not be affected by the x-ray probe itself.
Endo et al. have proposed a monoclinic Pc structure for
phase IV.22 This structure shows complicated distortions in
atomic arrangement and interatomic distances due to its very
low symmetry. The monoclinic cell with the same length of a
and c axes might be converted to an orthogonal system. The
11.4 GPa diffraction pattern they used for structural analysis
involved the strongest peak with the doublet feature. Our
pattern at 11.9 GPa at room temperature also showed the
doublet feature for the strongest peak, and the overall profile
was essentially in agreement with that of the 11.4 GPa data.
By a Rietveld analysis, the pattern was satisfactorily repro-
FIG. 4. (Color online) Interatomic sulfur-sulfur distances of H2S
under pressure. The data drawn with the triangles, the inverse tri-
angles, the circles, the diamonds, and the squares correspond to the
phases I, I , III , IV , and IV, respectively. Our previous data for
Ј
Ј
Ј
phases I, I , and IV at room temperature (Ref. 5) are included in this
Ј
plot. The open circles at 0 GPa show the phase III data at 1.5 K
(Ref. 1). The horizontal arrows represent twice the sulfur van der
Waals radius ͑ dW͒ and twice the sulfur constant energy radius
v
͑2r*͒. The vertical dashed line represents the IV -IV boundary at
Ј
12.0 GPa.
duced with the phase IV model of the orthorhombic Ibca
Ј
structure. The relationship between the Pc cell ͑am,bm,cm͒
and the Ibca cell ͑a0,b0,c0͒ was written as: a0=am+cm, c0
=cm−am, b0=2bm. Thus the previous pattern was taken at
23.3 GPa. the sulfur constant energy radius of 2.92 Å (Ref.
20) shown with 2r* in Fig. 4, which is a criterion for the
existence of overlap of the molecular orbitals or of covalent
bond formation.10,21 The present low-temperature experiment
extended significantly the pressure span for structural mea-
surement as a result of the suppression of the dissociation
reaction, and the S-S distances of phase IV were measured
up to 43 GPa. The S-S distance decreases to 2.74 Å at a
pressure of 43 GPa, below beyond the critical value of
2.92 Å. At this pressure, intrachain covalency should
strengthen. After the dissociation, this S-S interaction may
become fully covalent bonds in sulfur phase II and amor-
phous sulfur.
11.4 GPa in a stable region of phase IV and could be ex-
Ј
plained as consistent with the Ibca structure which is prefer-
able to the Pc structure.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The present work was carried out as a part of the CREST
(Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology)
project of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation
and with the approval of the Photon Factory Program Advi-
sory Committee (Proposal Nos. 98G272 and 00G202).
1 J. K. Cockcroft and A. N. Fitch, Z. Kristallogr. 193, 1 (1990).
2 H. Shimizu, Y. Nakamichi, and S. Sasaki, J. Chem. Phys. 95,
2036 (1991).
and Technology of High Pressure, edited by M. H. Manghnani,
W. J. Nellis, and M. F. Nicol (Universities Press, Hyderabad,
2000), p. 391.
3 S. Endo, N. Ichimiya, K. Koto, S. Sasaki, and H. Shimizu, Phys.
Rev. B 50, 5865 (1994).
10 M. Sakashita, H. Fujihisa, H. Yamawaki, and K. Aoki, J. Phys.
Chem. A 104, 8838 (2000).
4 H. Shimizu, H. Murashima, and S. Sasaki, J. Chem. Phys. 97,
7137 (1992).
11 H. Shimizu, H. Yamaguchi, S. Sasaki, A. Honda, S. Endo, and M.
Kobayashi, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9391 (1995).
5 H. Fujihisa, H. Yamawaki, M. Sakashita, K. Aoki, S. Sasaki, and
H. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. B 57, 2651 (1998).
12 J. S. Loveday, R. J. Nelmes, S. Klotz, J. M. Besson, and G.
Hamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1024 (2000).
6 S. Endo, A. Honda, S. Sasaki, H. Shimizu, O. Shimomura, and T.
Kikegawa, Phys. Rev. B 54, R717 (1996).
13 R. Rousseau, M. Boero, M. Bernasconi, M. Parrinello, and K.
Terakura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2218 (1999).
7 H. Shimizu, T. Ushida, S. Sasaki, M. Sakashita, H. Yamawaki,
and K. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 55, 5538 (1997).
14 T. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. B 64, 104103 (2001).
15 R. Rousseau, M. Boero, M. Bernasconi, M. Parrinello, and K.
Terakura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1254 (2000).
8 M. Sakashita, H. Yamawaki, H. Fujihisa, K. Aoki, S. Sasaki, and
H. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1082 (1997).
9 M. Yamagishi, H. Furuta, S. Endo, and M. Kobayashi, in Science
16 Y. Akahama (private communication).
17 Y. Akahama, M. Kobayashi, and H. Kawamura, Phys. Rev. B 48,
214102-4