tactic of enone protection followed by reduction to give
homoanatoxin as the hydrochloride salt 2 in 10 steps and
14.8% overall yield from readily available starting materials.z
In conclusion, we have described a unified approach to the
synthesis of anatoxin-a (1) and homoanatoxin (2) from a
common precursor. Work is on-going in these laboratories
to extend this approach to the synthesis of a range of un-
natural anatoxin-a derivatives and for the multigram syntheses
of these important biological tools. Our reports on these
developments will be disclosed in due course.
Scheme 4 Deprotection of N-tosyl anatoxin-a.
Notes and references
1. W. W. Carmichael, D. F. Biggs and P. R. Gorham, Science, 1975,
187, 542.
2. J. P. Delvin, O. E. Edwards, P. R. Gorham, N. R. Hunter,
R. K. Pike and B. Stavric, Can. J. Chem., 1977, 55, 1367.
3. (a) M. Gugger, S. Lenoir, C. Berger, A. Ledreux, J. C. Druart,
J. F. Humbert, C. Guette and C. Bernard, Toxicon, 2005, 45, 919;
(b) C. Edwards, K. A. Beattie, C. M. Scrimgeour and G. A. Codd,
Toxicon, 1992, 30, 1165; (c) K. Sivonen, K. Himberg,
R. Luukkainen, S. I. Niemelae, G. K. Poon and G. A. Codd,
Toxic. Assess., 1989, 4, 339; (d) S. A. Wood, D. J. Stirling,
L. R. Briggs, J. Sprosen, P. Holland, J. G. Ruck and R. G. N.
Z. Wear, J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 2006, 40, 585; (e) E. Viaggiu,
S. Melchiorre, F. Volpi, A. Di Corcia, R. Mancini, L. Garibaldi,
G. Crichigno and M. Bruno, Environ. Toxicol., 2004, 19, 191;
(f) M. Namikoshi, T. Murakami, M. F. Watanabe, T. Oda,
J. Yamada, S. Tsujimura, H. Nagai and S. Oishi, Toxicon, 2003,
42, 533; (g) A. Ballot, L. Krienitz, K. Kotut, C. Wiegand and
S. Pflugmacher, Harmful Algae, 2005, 4, 139.
Scheme 5 Synthesis of homoanatoxin.
4. S. Wonnacott, K. L. Swanson, E. X. Albuquerque, N. J. S. Huby,
P. Thompson and T. Gallagher, Biochem. Pharmacol., 1992, 43,
419.
5. O. M. Skulberg, W. W. Carmichael, R. A. Andersen,
S. Matsunaga, R. E. Moore and R. Skulberg, Environ. Toxicol.
Chem., 1992, 11, 321.
6. For a recent review on the pharmacology of anatoxin-a and
analogues, see: S. Wonnacott and T. Gallagher, Mar. Drugs,
2006, 4, 228.
7. C. B. Cassels, I. Bermudez, F. Dajas, J. A. Abin-Carriquiry and
S. Wonnacott, Drug Discovery Today, 2005, 10, 1657.
8. For reviews on synthetic approaches to anatoxin-a, see:
H. L. Mansell, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 6025; V. Rodriguez, S. M.
e E. Pinto, C. M. P. Pereira and R. C. Braga, Quim. Nova, 2006,
29, 1365.
enone, such that more severe reducing conditions could be
utilised to remove the sulfonamide (Scheme 4).
Reaction of 12 with ethylene glycol under Dean–Stark
conditions gave the dioxolane 13 in 95% yield. In an analo-
gous reaction to the final step of Backvall and co-workers’s
ferruginine synthesis,15 sulfonamide 13 was treated with an
initial portion of magnesium powder (30 equivalents) in
methanol with sonication. After 40 minutes an additional 30
equivalents of magnesium powder were added and the sonica-
tion continued for a further hour before the addition of
aqueous HCl. It was found that the dioxolane protecting
group was removed and anatoxin-a was recovered as the
hydrochloride salt 1 in 82% yield over two steps from 12.
Overall, this constitutes a synthesis of anatoxin-a in 10 steps
and 27.1% overall yield from readily available starting
materials.
9. S. L. Schreiber, R. E. Claus and J. Regan, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982,
23, 3867.
10. T. M. Trnka and R. H. Grubbs, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 18.
11. P. Somfai and J. Ahman, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 3791. The
same cascade was also used by Speckamp et al. in their synthesis of
anatoxin-a, in that case with a carbomethoxy nitrogen protecting
group: K. H. Melching, H. Hiemstra, W. J. Klaver and
W. N. Speckamp, Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 4799.
With the synthesis of anatoxin-a (1) complete, our attention
turned to the adaption of this strategy for the synthesis of
homoanatoxin (2), which had previously been synthesised
by Gallagher in two steps and 19.2% yield from N-BOC
anatoxin-a.4 Scheme 5 shows our synthesis.
12. Royer and Husson also used this type of cyclisation promoted by
HCl in methanol in the synthesis of ferruginine: I. Gauthier,
J. Royer and H.-P. Husson, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 6704.
13. These conditions had previously proved problematic to others too:
Tanner et al. reported a 51% yield for the HCl–MeOH cyclisation
and also observed racemisation of their enantioenriched system,
which used a carbomethoxy protecting group and an ethoxyhe-
miaminal iminium precursor: T. Hjelmgaard, I. Støtofte and
D. Tanner, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 5688. In this paper, Tanner
describes several other sets of conditions that were investigated
and were not able to promote this cyclisation (H2SO4–MeOH,
TFA–CH2Cl2, TiCl4–CH2Cl2, DMAP–Sn(OTf)2–CH2Cl2).
14. B. M. Trost and J. D. Oslob, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3057.
15. S. Y. Jonsson, C. M. G. Lofstrom and J.-E. Backvall, J. Org.
Chem., 2000, 65, 8454.
Accordingly, alkene 8 was subjected to the desymmetrising
ozonolysis reaction to give aldehyde 4 which underwent olefi-
nation with 1-(diethylphosphono)butan-2-one to give enone
14. The TMSI-promoted tandem iminium formation–enol
ether formation–intramolecular Mannich reaction and subse-
quent elimination worked as on our previous substrate, giving
a 55% yield of 15 for this key step. Removal of the sulfona-
mide protecting group of 15 was accomplished using the same
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
3434 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 3432–3434