Intramolecular C-H Insertion Reactions
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 10, 2001 3455
Likewise, the ester substrate 25 undergoes elimination
to give a complex mixture containing a small amount of
benzyl acrylate as the only identifiable product with no
evidence of intramolecular insertion adjacent to the ester
oxygen tether (eq 16).
enolate to thiocarbene complex 10. The synthesis is
completed as in Little’s route20b by addition of methyl-
lithium to tricyclic ketone 28 and dehydration of the
resulting alcohol. The (()-sterpurene thus obtained is
identical to previously obtained material by direct com-
1
parison of H and 13C NMR spectra.19,20d
Pentalenene (34), an angular triquinane, is the parent
hydrocarbon of the pentalenolactone family of antibiotic
metabolites. It was first synthesized by Ohfune, Shira-
hama, and Matsumoto in 1976 as part of a study of
biosynthetic cyclizations,22 but it was not actually re-
ported as a naturally occurring compound until 1980
when it was isolated from Streptomyces griseochromo-
genes.23 Numerous syntheses of pentalenene have sub-
sequently been published.24 As another application of our
insertion reaction, we have accomplished a formal syn-
thesis of (()-pentalenene that merges with a late inter-
mediate in Pattenden’s earlier synthesis.24f
The basic strategy (Scheme 6) follows from a biomi-
metic, acid-catalyzed, transannular cyclization of fused
1,5-cyclooctadiene 35. This intermediate, which was
employed by Pattenden,24f is available from unsaturated
ketone 36. This ketone is the focus of our formal
synthesis, featuring the formation of bicyclic ketone 37
from complex 38. This carbene precursor is, in turn,
prepared by the usual sequence from enone 39.
The synthesis commences with commercially available
1,5-cyclooctanediol (40, Scheme 7), which is oxidized with
J ones reagent to give 5-hydroxycyclooctanone in the form
of bicyclic hemiketal 41.25 Protection with tert-butyldi-
methylsilyl chloride26 gives monocyclic siloxy ketone 42.
The corresponding enone 39 is obtained by reaction of
the ketone with benzeneselenenyl chloride followed by
oxidative elimination of the selenide with hydrogen
peroxide27 or alternatively by conversion of the ketone
to the silyl enol ether and use of the Saegusa procedure
Ap p lica tion s
Sterpurene (27) was reported by Ayer as a metabolite
of Stereum purpureum, a fungus that is responsible for
silver leaf disease of a variety of trees and scrubs.19
Syntheses of racemic and nonracemic sterpurene have
been reported by several investigators.20 We recognized
this compound as a possible synthetic target for the
application of our insertion reaction.
A necessary focus of any total synthesis of sterpurene
is the construction of the 4/6/5 tricyclic carbon skeleton
(Scheme 4). We anticipated that the tricyclic ketone 28
could be obtained by an insertion reaction employing
complex 29. In turn, our usual route to cyclization
precursors would utilize bicyclic enone 30, itself available
by photochemical cycloaddition of ethylene and a cyclo-
hexenone followed by reintroduction of unsaturation.21
This strategy was implemented successfully (Scheme
5). Commercially available 3-methyl-2-cyclohexenone
undergoes photochemical cycloaddition of ethylene, and
R-bromination of the resulting bicyclic ketone 31 followed
by dehydrobromination generates enone 30.21 Copper(I)-
catalyzed conjugate addition13 of isobutylmagnesium
bromide provides ketone 32 as a 3:1 to 4:1 mixture of â
and R isomers favoring the former. After chromatographic
separation, the â isomer is converted to enol silyl ether
33. Enolate regeneration and trapping with thiocarbene
complex 10 affords iron complex 29. Treatment with
trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate leads to the desired
tricyclic ketone 28 as an inconsequential mixture of trans-
and cis-fused isomers. This key step occurs in yields
ranging from 80% to 90% from precursor 29. However,
the overall cyclopentane annulation is operationally
simpler when iron complex 29 is not isolated or purified,
in which case the overall yield of tricyclic ketone 28 is
48% from silyl enol ether 33. The main limitation on the
overall yield for this ring construction appears to be
incomplete reaction of the enolate derived from 33 in that
20-30% of ketone 32 is recovered after exposure of the
(22) (a) Ohfune, Y.; Shirahama, H.; Matsumoto, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1976, 17, 2869-2872. For more recent biosynthetic studies, see: (b)
Cane, D. E.; Oliver. J . S.; Harrison, P. H. M.; Abell, C.; Hubbard, B.
R.; Kane, C. T.; Lattman, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4513-4524.
(23) Seto, H.; Yonehara, H. J . Antibiot. 1980, 33, 92-93.
(24) (a) Paquette, L. A.; Annis, G. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
7358-7363. (b) Baker, R.; Keen, R. B. J . Organomet. Chem. 1985, 285,
419-427. (c) Crimmins, M. T.; DeLoach, J . A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 800-806. (d) Hua, D. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3835-
3837. (e) Mehta, G.; Rao, K. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 8015-
8021. (f) Pattenden, G.; Teague, S. J . Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5637-
5652. (g) Hudlicky, T.; Sinai-Zingde, G.; Natchus, M. G.; Ranu, B. C.;
Papadopolous, P. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5685-5721. (h) Piers, E.;
Karunaratne, V. Can. J . Chem. 1989, 67, 160-164. (i) Imanishi, T.;
Yamashita, M.; Hirokawa, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Iwata, C. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1990, 38, 1124-1128. (j) Shizuri, Y.; Maki, S.; Ohkubo, M.;
Yamamura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7167-7168. (k) Wu, Y. J .;
Burnell, D. J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991, 764-765. (l) Zhao,
S.; Mehta, G.; Helquist, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5753-5756.
(m) Rowley, E. G.; Schore, N. E. J . Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6853-6861.
(n) Ihara, M. J . Pharm. Soc. J pn. 1992, 112, 516-533. (o) Patel, H.
A.; Stothers, J . B.; Thomas, S. E. Can. J . Chem. 1994, 72, 56-68. (p)
Wu, Y.-J .; Zhu, Y.-Y.; Burnell, D. J . J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 104-110.
(q) Lange, G. L.; Gottardo, C. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2183-2187. (r)
Zhu, Y.-Y.; Burnell, D. J . Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 3295-
3304. (s) Hatanaka, M.; Ueno, F.; Ueda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
89-90. (t) Tormo, J .; Moyano, A.; Pericas, M. A.; Riera, A. J . Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 2, 4851-4856. (u) Miesch, M.; Gross-Miesch, L.;
Franck-Neumann, M., Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 2111-2118. (v) Kim, S.;
Cheong, J . H.; Yoo, J . Synlett 1998, 981-982. (w) Seo, J .; Fain, H.;
Blanc, J .-B.; Montgomery, J . J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6060-6065. (y)
Harrington-Frost, N. M.; Pattenden G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
403-405.
(19) Ayer, W. A.; Saeedi-Ghomi, M. H. Can. J . Chem. 1981, 59,
2536-2538.
(20) (a) Murata, Y.; Ohtsuta, T.; Shirahama, H.; Matsumoto, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 4313-4314. (b) Moe¨ns, L.; Baizer, M. M.;
Little, R. D. J . Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4497-4498. (c) Gibbs, R. A.;
Okamura, W. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4062-4063. (d) Gibbs,
R. A.; Bartels, K.; Lee, R. W. K.; Okamura, W. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 3717-3725. (e) Zhao, S.-K.; Helquist, P. J . Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 5820-5821. (f) Krause, N. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1993, 521-525. (g)
Strunz, G. M.; Bethell, R.; Dumas, M. T.; Boyonoski, N. Can. J . Chem.
1997, 75, 742-753. (h) Birkenes, O. J .; Hansen, T. V.; M’dachi, S.;
Skattebol, L.; Stenstrom, Y. Acta Chem. Scand. 1998, 52, 806-812.
(i) Singh, V.; Alam, S. Q. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1999, 2519-
2520.
(25) Meier, H.; Petersen, H. Synthesis 1978, 596-598. This com-
pound is also commercially available from BASF.
(26) Corey, E. J .; Venkateswarlu, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
6190-6191.
(27) Gopalakrishnan, G.; Rajagopalan, K. Indian J . Chem. 1985,
24B, 765-766.
(21) (a) Zurflu¨h, R.; Dunham, L. L.; Spain, V. L.; Siddall, J . B. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 425-427. (b) Cargill, R. L.; Dalton, J . R.;
Morton, G. H.; Caldwell, W. E. Org. Synth. 1984, 62, 118-124. (c)
J acques, J .; Marquet, A. Organic Syntheses; Noland, W. E., Ed.;
Wiley: New York, 1988; Collect. Vol. VI, pp 175-178.