3
Figure 4. Recycling of the catalyst in the amide bond formation
reaction of compound 2n.
In summary, we have developed an efficient method for the
C–O cross-coupling of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds with N,N-
dialkyl formamides to form enol carbamates, as well as oxidative
coupling of amine hydrochloride salts with aromatic aldehydes to
form amides, using copper nanoparticles supported on charcoal
as a heterogeneous and reusable catalyst. Various derivatives of
these compounds were synthesized in moderate to good yields.
The catalyst could be recycled up to five times without
significant loss of activity.
Figure 2: Structures of synthesized amides. Reagents and
conditions: aldehyde (1 mmol), amine hydrochloride salt (2
equiv.), CH3CN (1 mL), Na2CO3 (2 equiv.), TBHP (1.5 equiv.),
Cu/C (20 mg, 3.68 mol%), 60 °C, 6 h. aGC yield.
Acknowledgment
We are thankful to Persian Gulf University Research Council
for partial support of this work.
In the case of aldehydes with substituents in the ortho position,
no products were formed which was probably due to steric
effects (Figure 2, 2j-l). Following the successful synthesis of
primary amides, some primary and secondary amine
hydrochloride salts were reacted with benzaldehyde to give the
corresponding secondary and tertiary amides (Figure 2, 2m-v). 1-
Naphthalenamine was not converted to the corresponding amide,
probably due to the strong resonance of nitrogen with the
aromatic rings and as a result of its weak basic strength (Figure 2,
2q). The low product yield obtained when using the
diphenylamine hydrochloride salt was probably for the same
reason (Figure 2, 2v). It is worth noting that when the free amine
was used instead of the amine hydrochloride, the corresponding
amide was formed in lower yield (for example, in the case of
benzyl amine the corresponding amide 2n was obtained in 56%
yield).
References and notes
1.
(a) Adams, P.; Baron, F. A. Chem. Rev. 1965, 65, 567; (b) Wu, T.
T.; Huang, J.; Arrington, N. D.; Dill, G. M. J. Agric. Food Chem.
1987, 35, 817; (c) Vauthey, I.; Valot, F.; Gozzi, C.; Fache, F.;
Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6347; (d) Wigfiled, Y. Y. Int.
J. Food Sci. Technol. 1996, 77, 1501.
2.
a) Green, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. in: Protecting Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York, 1999; (b) Caroino, L. A. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1973, 6, 191; (c) Xiuo, X. Yi.; Ngu, K.; Choa, C.; Patel,
D. V. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6968.
3. (a) Kocovsky, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 5521; (b) Angeles, E.;
Santillan, A.; Martinez, I.; Ramirez, A.; Moreno, E.; Salmon, M.;
Martinez, R. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 2441; (c) Yadav, J. S.;
Reddy, G. S.; Reddy, M. M.; Meshram, H. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 3259.
4. Kumar, G. S.; Maheswari, C.U.; Kumar, R. A.; Kantam, M. L.;
Reddy, K. R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11748.
5.
6. (a) Wang, G. W.; Yuan, T. T.; Li, D. D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011,
50, 1380; (b) Cupido, T.; Tulla-Puche, J.; Spengler, J.; Albericio, F.
Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2007, 10, 768; (c) Bode, J. W.
Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2006, 9, 765; (d) Humphrey, J. M.;
Chamberlin, A. R. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2243; (e) X. X. Zhang, W.
T. Teo, P. W. H. Chan, J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 331.
7. (a) Allen, C. L.; Williams, J. M. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3405;
(b) Pattabiraman, V. R.; Bode, J. W. Nature 2011, 480, 471.
8. (a) Bode, J. W.; Sohn, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13798; (b)
Chang, J. W. W.; Chan, P. W. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
1138; (c) Tillack, A.; Rudloff, I.; Beller, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
523; (d) Chan, W. K.; Ho, C. M.; Wong, M. K.; Che, C. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14796; (e) Seo, S.; Marks, T. J. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 317; (f) Ghosh, S. C.; Ngiam, J. S. Y.; Chai, C. L. L.;
Seayad, A. M.; Tuan, D. T.; Chen, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354,
1407; (g) Yoo, W. –J; Li, C. -J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13064;
(h) Ghosh, S. C.; Ngiam, J. S. Y.; Seayad, A. M.; Tuan, D. T.; Chai,
C. L. L.; Chen, A. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 8007; (i) Zhu, M.; Fujita,
K. –I.; Yamaguchi, R. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9102; (j) Zhang, M.;
Wu, X. –F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1059; (k) Liu, X.; Jensen, K.
F. Green Chem. 2014, 14, 1471; (l) Leow, M. Org. Lett. 2014, 16,
5812; (m) Ding, Zhang, X.; Zhang, D.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, P.;
Xue, W.; Song, B.; Yang, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 831.
9. (a) Barbaro, P.; Liguori, F. Heterogenized Homogeneous Catalysts
for Fine Chemicals Production: Catalysis by Metal Complexes, Vol.
33, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010; (b) Thomas, J. M.; Thomas, W. J.
Plat. Met. Rev. 1996, 40, 8.
Finally, the reusability of the catalyst was studied for the
synthesis of compounds 1a and 2n.
Figure 3. Recycling of the catalyst in the C–O cross-coupling
reaction of compound 1a.
After reaction completion EtOAc was added to the reaction
vessel, and the catalyst was recovered by filtration, washed with
H2O and ethanol and oven-dried at 80 °C overnight. A second
reaction was then performed with fresh solvent and reactants
under identical conditions. Using this approach, the catalyst
could be reused at least five times with no appreciable loss in
catalytic activity observed (Figures 3 and 4).