TABLE 3. Hydrogenation of Methyl
sodium benzophenone ketyl. Anhydrous EtOAc, acetone, and
CH2Cl2 were distilled from calcium hydride. Anhydrous MeOH
was distilled from magnesium. SPINOL,15 R-dehydroamino
esters,16 and â-dehydroamino esters17 were prepared by reported
methods.
â-Aryl-â-(acetamino)acrylatesa
General Procedure for Synthesis of Spiro Phosphonite
Ligands. To a stirred solution of (S)-SPINOL (250 mg, 1.0
mmol) and Et3N (0.5 mL) in 5 mL of THF was added ArPCl2
(1.2 mmol) slowly at room temperature. The reaction mixture
was stirred at rt for 1 h, and the product was purified by flash
chromatography on a silica gel column using petroleum/EtOAc
as eluent.
ligand
substrate (Ar)
time (h)
convb (%)
eec (%)
(S)-1
Ph
40
40
40
40
48
48
36
36
36
48
48
48
100
100
100
100
70
90
92
92
93
87
40
94
95
98
90
85
91
(S)-2a
(S)-2b
(S)-2c
(S)-2d
(S)-2e
(S)-2c
(S)-2c
(S)-2c
(S)-2c
(S)-2c
(S)-2c
Ph
Ph
Ph
(S)-O,O′-[7,7′-(1,1′-Spirobiindan)]phenylphosphonite (2a):
oil; 77% yield; [R]20D ) -132 (c 0.5, CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.98-2.12 (m, 2H), 2.21-3.33 (m, 2H), 2.84-2.92 (m,
2H), 3.01-3.16 (m, 2H), 5.76 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (t, J ) 8
Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d,
J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.23-7.32 (m, 5H), 7.38-7.42 (m, 1H); 31P NMR
(121 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.11; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 30.8,
31.2, 37.6, 38.2, 38.8, 59.2, 114.5, 117.9, 120.8, 121.0, 121.7,
122.2, 127.4, 128.6, 128.7, 129.1, 130.9, 131.2, 135.0, 140.8, 142.1,
142.6, 145.1, 145.7; IR (KBr) 2950, 2848, 1609, 1584, 1464, 1435,
1323, 1233, 1221, 1162, 1131, 1102, 1063, 1014, 992, 953, 922
cm-1; HRMS (EI) for C23H19O2P calcd 358.1122, found 358.1114.
(S)-O,O′-[7,7′-(1,1′-Spirobiindan)]-4-methylphenylphos-
Ph
Ph
30
4-CH3Ph
2-CH3OPh
4-CH3OPh
4-ClPh
3-BrPh
4-BrPh
100
100
100
100
100
100
a Rh(COD)2BF4/ligand/substrate ) 1:2:100. b Determined by GC.
Quantitative yields were obtained unless mentioned otherwise.
c Determined by chiral GC using a Varian Chiralsil-L-Val column
or chiral HPLC using a Chiralcel OD-H column. The absolute
configurations were R.
1
phonite (2b): oil; 81% yield; [R]20 ) -120 (c 0.5, CH2Cl2); H
D
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.98-2.16 (m, 2H), 2.22-3.34 (m, 5H),
2.84-2.92 (m, 2H), 3.01-3.18 (m, 2H), 5.80 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H),
6.68-6.74 (m, 2H), 6.88-7.26 (m, 7H); 31P NMR (121 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 156.2; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 30.8, 31.2, 38.2,
38.8, 59.3, 120.9, 121.8, 122.1, 127.4, 127.9, 128.0, 129.2, 130.8,
131.1, 131.7, 137.8, 138.2, 140.8, 142.6, 145.1, 145.7, 145.9, 149.;
IR (KBr) 2950, 2849, 1584, 1464, 1233, 1221, 1162, 1102, 1014,
992, 922 cm-1; HRMS (FAB) for C24H21O2P + H+ calcd 373.1352,
found 373.1352.
donating substituent afforded faster reaction and higher
enantioselectivity. The highest enantioselectivity (98%
ee) was achieved in the hydrogenation of methyl â-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-â-(acetamino)acrylate. However, the sub-
strates with electron-withdrawing substituents had lower
reaction rates and enantioselectivities. Methyl â-(2-
boromophenyl)-â-(acetamino)acrylate cannot be hydro-
genated at the same conditions.
(S)-O,O′-[7,7′-(1,1′-Spirobiindan)]-4-methoxyphenylphos-
1
phonite (2c): oil; 77% yield; [R]20 ) -160 (c 0.5, CH2Cl2); H
D
In conclusion, we have developed novel chiral mono-
dentate phosphonite ligands with spirobiindane as a
backbone, which are highly effective for the Rh-catalyzed
asymmetric hydrogenations of R- and â-dehydroamino
acid derivatives. The enantioselectivities achieved in hy-
drogenation of (Z/E)-â-aryl-â-(acetamino)acrylates rep-
resent the highest level of enantiocontrol in the hydro-
genation of Z/E mixtures of â-dehydroamino acid deriva-
tives by using monophosphorus ligands. We also demon-
strated that the electron-donating substituents on the
P-phenyl ring of phosphonite ligands 2 have a limited
influence on the enantioselectivity of ligand, while the
electron-withdrawing substituents resulted in a signifi-
cant decrease in both reactivity and enantioselectivity
of ligand. To probe whether this detrimental effect was
caused by the electronic effect of ligand on the catalyst
or by the less efficiency of electron-poor ligand in the
coordination, we compared the coordinative behavior of
ligands 2a, 2c and 2e to rhodium. The coordinations of
all these three ligands to rhodium were complete in 5
min at the reaction conditions,14 which indicated that the
lower reaction rates and enantioselectivities of ligands
with electron-withdrawing substituents were mainly
attributed to the electronic effect of ligand on the catalyst.
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.98-2.12 (m, 2H), 2.20-3.32 (m, 2H),
2.83-2.91 (m, 2H), 3.01-3.16 (m, 2H), 2.80 (s, 3H), 5.79 (d, J )
8 Hz, 1H), 6.70-6.79 (m, 3H), 6.91-7.00 (m, 2H), 7.08-7.27 (m,
4H); 31P NMR (121 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.48; 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 30.8, 31.3, 38.2, 38.9, 55.4, 59.3, 113.4, 120.8, 121.3,
121.7, 122.3, 127.5, 129.2, 129.4, 129.8, 132.7, 133.1, 140.9, 142.6,
145.1, 145.7, 145.9, 150.1, 162.5; IR (KBr) 2949, 2844, 1594,
1500, 1464, 1293, 1253, 1222, 1179, 1162, 1132, 1105, 1014, 991,
921 cm-1; HRMS (FAB) for C24H21O3P + H+ calcd 389.1301,
found 389.1301.
(S)-O,O′-[7,7′-(1,1′-spirobiindan)]-4-chlorophenylphos-
1
phonite (2d): oil; 76% yield; [R]20 ) -120 (c 0.5, CH2Cl2); H
D
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.98-2.14 (m, 2H), 2.21-3.33 (m, 2H),
2.84-2.92 (m, 2H), 3.02-3.18 (m, 2H), 5.78 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H),
6.74 (t, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J ) 8 Hz,
1H), 7.11 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.18-7.28 (m, 5H); 31P NMR (121
MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.2; 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 30.8, 31.2,
38.2, 38.9, 59.3, 114.5, 117.9, 120.9, 121.1, 122.0, 127.6, 128.3,
129.1, 132.2, 132.6, 136.3, 136.7, 138.0, 140.7, 142.5, 145.3, 145.8,
149.6; IR (KBr) 2948, 2846, 1918, 1609, 1581, 1464, 1386, 1319,
1300, 1233, 1221, 1161, 1132, 1086, 1012, 991, 952, 921 cm-1
HRMS (EI) for C23H18ClO2P, calcd 392.0733, found 392.0737.
;
(S)-O,O′-[7,7′-(1,1′-Spirobiindan)]-4-trifluoromethylphen-
ylphosphonite (2e): oil; 56% yield; [R]20 ) -108 (c 0.5, CH2-
D
Cl2); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.98-2.12 (m, 2H), 2.21-
3.34 (m, 2H), 2.84-2.93 (m, 2H), 3.04-3.18 (m, 2H), 5.74 (d, J
) 8 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (t, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.00
(d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H), 7.25-7.29 (m, 1H),
Experimental Section
(15) (a) Birman, V. B.; Rheingold, A. L.; Lam, K.-C. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 125. (b) Zhang, J.-H.; Liao, J.; Cui, X.; Yu, K.-B.;
Deng, J.-G.; Zhu, S.-F.; Wang, L.-X.; Zhou, Q.-L.; Chung, L.-W.; Ye, T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmtry 2002, 13, 1363.
General Methods. All reactions and manipulations were
performed in an argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk
techniques. Anhydrous toluene and THF were distilled from
(16) Herbst, R. M.; Shemin, D. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York,
1943; Collect. Vol. II, p 1.
(14) 31P NMR: [Rh(2a)(COD)]BF4 δ 140.7 (d, JRh-P ) 208.8 Hz); [Rh-
(2c)(COD)BF4] δ 141.0 (d, JRh-P ) 197.1 Hz); Rh(2e)(COD)BF4] δ 137.7
(d, JRh-P ) 210.9 Hz).
(17) (a) Lubell, W. D.; Kitamura, M.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 543. (b) Krapacho, A. P.; Diamanti, J.; Zayen, C.;
Binghan, R. Org. Synth. 1973, 5, 198.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 23, 2004 8159