Full text of DOI:10.1111/1468-2397.00222

Int J Soc Welfare 2002: 11: 254–262
Invited Article
Historical development and
characteristics of social work in
today’s China
Xia X, Guo J. Historical development and characteristics of
Xueluan Xia, Jing Guo
Department of Sociology, Peking University
social work in today’s China
Int J Soc Welfare 2002: 11: 254–262 ß Blackwell, 2002.
Social work education has experienced three stages since its
introduction to China in the 1920s: introduction, abolishment
and reinstatement. Theoretically, there are four types of social
work in China: official-educational, official-practical,
voluntary-educational and voluntary-practical. In practice,
all four types of social work have not necessarily been
embodied in each developmental stage, and the order of their
historical development is not the same as the order of their
logical development; i.e. some types are lacking in some of the
stages. Each type of social work has its own characteristics,
which are integrated into each development stage. Today,
Chinese social work faces two major interrelated tasks: the
professionalisation and the institutionalisation of social work.
The former refers to the development of standardisation in
Chinese social work; the latter has to do with the development
of the social welfare institution in general and the
development of institutional welfare in particular. In general,
the dramatic development in Chinese social work largely
depends on the accomplishment of the two tasks.
Key words: educational social work, practical social work,
official social work, voluntary social work, professionalisation
of social work in China, institutionalisation of social work in
China
XueluanXia,DepartmentofSociology,PekingUniversity, China
E-mail: xl@pku.edu.cn
Accepted for publication January 15, 2002
Social work, which was introduced in China in 1922,
has had less than 100 years’ history. During this time
its development was interrupted for a period of some
36 years. It was first in 1988 that the development of
professional social work in China was resumed. To
fully understand the historical development and main
characteristics of social work in China, we must look
not only at the situation today, but also at social work
in a historical perspective – its initial introduction,
subsequent abolishment and later reinstatement. As
Chinese social work’s main characteristics are largely
embodied in its historical development, a reasonable
narrative approach would be to discuss its repre-
sentative features during the various stages of its
history. Such an approach is not only convenient and
feasible, but also avoids the mistake of artificiality and
empty rhetoric that arises when the main features of
social work are regarded separate from its historical
development. This article discuss mainly three integra-
tive issues: 1) social work’s introduction in China
(1922–1952), 2) the 36-year period during which
social work education was abolished (1952–1988), and
3) social work’s reinstatement in today’s China.
Social work's introduction in China (1922±1952)
The 30 years between 1922, when a department of
sociology was first established at Yenching
University, and 1952, when the study of sociology
and social work was abolished, can be regarded as the
introductory stage of social work in China. Social
work is a discipline with many dimensions. For the
purposes of this article, the authors have divided social
work into two dimensions: practical-educational and
voluntary-official. Using the former as the x-axis and
the latter as the y-axis gives us a frame of reference
wherein four types of social work emerge: official-
educational social work, official-practical social work,
voluntary-educational social work and voluntary-
practical social work. Figure 1 illustrates this
relationship.
It shows the logical or mature condition of Chinese
social work, but greater transparency is achieved if
various parts are presented and analysed in the order of
their historical development. So the following
narrative is according to the historical development
order of Chinese social work, not the logical order.
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002.
Published by Blackwell Publishers, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden MA 02148, USA
254

Social work in today’s China
religion college, and, lastly, a social service corres-
pondence programme. This brief presentation shows
quite clearly the main orientation of the social work
education programme at Yenching University.
The main contribution of the Department of
Sociology and Social Administration at Yenching
University was to promote the professionalism of
social work education in China. This becomes
apparent if we take into account two events.
official
2
4
1
"
practical
educational
!
3
voluntary
The first was the start in 1927 of the publication The
Sociological World. Ten volumes in all were published
before the outbreak of war with Japan in 1936. Besides
publishing sociological papers and investigative reports
in social work, each volume of The Sociological World
also published a special annual report on the progress
being made in the development of social work at the
Department of Sociology and Social Service Admini-
stration at Yenching University, as well as information
on the development of social work at other universities.
Among the more well-known of the published
contributions were ‘A Study of 1200 Poor Families in
Peiping’ by David New (The Sociological World, Vol. 7,
1933), ‘A Study of the Soup-Kitchens in Peiping’ by
Chang Chin-kai (The Sociological World, Vol. 7, 1933)
and ‘The Ch’ing Ho Village-Town Community’ by Ti
Huang (The Sociological World Vol. 10, 1936).
The second event of note was the establishment of
the Ch’ing Ho Fieldwork Base sponsored by the
Kellogg Foundation. This base provided a much-
needed arena for teachers and students to apply their
values, knowledge and skills in daily practice; the base
also produced many investigative reports and papers of
high academic merit. All these papers and investi-
gations, as well as the fieldwork base itself, played an
important role in promoting the professionalism of
social work in China.
Several other private colleges and schools run by the
Christian Church – for example, Kinling University at
Nanjing, Kinling Women College of Humanities and
Natural Science and the Educational Administration
College at Su Zhou – also offered either whole
educational programmes or at least some courses in
social work, or had established a department of social
work or social administration (Fang Yuan, 1988).
Although Hu Jiang University at Shanghai established
a sociology department in 1915,1 it offered no courses
in social work until 1933. Moreover, Fudan, Daxia, St
John and Guanghua, among others, also instituted their
own sociology departments, and several of these
institutions offered courses in social work as well.
Figure 1. Analytical diagram showing the direction of
development of Chinese social work.
1: official-educational social work; 2: official-practical social
work; 3: voluntary-educational social work; 4: voluntary-
practical social work
Voluntary-educational social work
What we have designated as voluntary-educational
social work refers to social work education as it was
developed by private institutions. Western social work
wanted to enter China and this was most easily done
by working through the private schools that had a
Western cultural background. Thus Yenching
University, which had an America cultural tradition,
became the natural point of entry for social work.
Consequently, J.S. Burgess and D.W. Edward, mem-
bers of the Princeton University Alumni Association in
China, instituted a sociology department in Yenching
University in 1922. This event marked the introduction
of social work into China because, besides sociology,
the department also encompassed the discipline of
social work. This dual-focus reflected the purpose for
which Burgess and Edward established the sociology
department at Yenching University. According to
Professors Lei Jie-qiong and Shui Shi-zheng, the
purpose was to train a professional corps of social
service professionals to work in charity organisations
and various social welfare agencies that had been
established in China by the USA (Actuality Challenge
Prospect, 1988). It was hardly incidental that the
sociology department at Yenching offered social work
education from the very start. At that time the
department was staffed by six Americans teachers,
with Burgess serving as the department’s chairman.
The department changed its name to the Department of
Sociology and Social Service Administration in 1925,
with Professor Xu Shi-lian as chairman. In 1927 the
new department established a summer school and
eight educational programmes: an undergraduate and a
graduate sociology programme, an undergraduate and
a graduate social service programme, a specialised
social service programme, a graduate religious social
service programme, a religious social service pro-
gramme for intensive study, sponsored partly by the
1
According to Li Tian-yu (Professor of Eastern China
Normal University at Shanghai), the sociology department
at Hu Jiang University was set up in 1915, but according to
Fu Su-dong (researcher at the Beijing Institute of Social
Sciences), it was set up two years earlier, in 1913.
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002
255

Xia & Guo
tions were exhibited. The Children’s Home made a
real difference in the children’s daily and future life.
An American missionary in China gave high praise
to the work of the Peiping Poor Children’s Home:
Voluntary-practical social work
Although much voluntary-practical social work was
carried out by private institutions and other philan-
thropic agencies, Yenching University also made an
ambitious contribution. With financial assistance from
the Kellogg Foundation, the university established the
Village Services and Fieldwork Base at Ch’ing Ho town
in 1928. Even though the base’s main purpose was
teaching, it also engaged in a fair amount of voluntary
social work for faculty and for the students during their
fieldwork training. The base also published many
reports and papers on social work practice and on its
ideas for helping people in need. Yenching University’s
Ch’ing Ho Fieldwork Base was not only an agency for
social work education, but also a base of operations for
social work in practice. Yenching University also
formed partnerships with a number of other institutions,
such as the Social Service Department of Xiehe
Hospital, the Christian Youth Association, the Chinese
and Overseas Relief Society, Beijing Prison, the
Psychoses Hospital, the Central Epidemic Prevention
Division, the China Club of Ping Religion, the Social
Investigation Department of Chinese Culture
Foundation Council, the Health Experiment Institute
in Beijing inner-city left second district, the Beijing
Local Service Federation and Tsinghua School.
I have lived in China for 16–17 years and have
travelled all around the country, yet I have never
found such a home for poor children as this. From
this experience I know now that Peiping’s
philanthropists have not allowed themselves to be
surpassed by the philanthropists of the Western
countries. Just as the chairperson said 8 or 9 years
after establishing the Peiping Poor Children’s
Home, even though it is not an affiliated agency
and has no income, it has helped more than two
hundred poor children; they are being molded by
charitable ideas and the loving actions of everybody
here. Today’s visit to the Home not only makes me
envious, but also challenges my prejudice that
China lack’s the quality of mercy; furthermore, it
has done away with my pessimistic perspectives
regarding Chinese social work. (Good paper, 1919)
Voluntary-practical social work was also characterised
by private donations and benevolent activities
organised by mass groups and voluntary organisations.
In 1920 China was in the grips of a severe drought;
swarms of grasshoppers destroyed the crops and
people all over the country were in danger of starving
to death. The North China Association of Disaster
Relief organised a fund-raising drive and published
petitions like the following:
Fieldwork units for child welfare included the
Infant Care society, the House of Nurture and day-
care, the House of Xiang Mountain Loving Infant and
the Beijing House for the Nurture of Infants.
Fieldwork was a very important part of voluntary-
practical social work. The social work values held by
teachers and students were realised through their
efforts in voluntary-practical social work.
Well! I say! Are there any human beings suffering
more from cold and hunger, more destitute and just
drifting from place to place than today’s victims of
the natural calamities in Tianjing city, the provinces
of Shandong, Henan and Shanxi? To go hungry year
after year, with no shelter for a long time; and then,
on top of everything else, this year’s drought,
desolation and war. Their situation is as a layer of
frost on top of snow. Cattle and livestock, whether
young or old, are killed for food. Refugees crowd
the roads, going without food day after day, carrying
the young and old, dwelling in the face of the wind
and sleeping in the dew, waiting for death, sobbing
and wailing with a cry of grief that reaches to the
gates of Heaven itself. Today the frost has already
begun to fall and winter is just around the corner;
imagine what a miserable prospect that is! In such a
situation, should men of good will take pleasure in
dressing warmly and eating their fill? Society
regards poor relief as its duty, so we appeal to all
men of good will to provide surplus millet to feed
the refugees, to give the naked clothes to keep out
the cold, to donate money for starting up new jobs,
and to use their intelligence to promote righteous
Voluntary-practical social work was mainly a
philanthropic undertaking, whereas welfare services
per se were provided by other private agencies. The
Peiping Poor Children’s Home is a good example.
This private institution was founded in the late autumn
of the third year of Xuantong in the Qing dynasty; it
was located in Millenary Buddha Temple Bystreet,
north Drum-tower inside Stability Door. The Peiping
Poor Children’s Home was a private philanthropic
agency and was not affiliated with any institution, nor
did it have a guaranteed funding base. Nevertheless, it
received and nurtured more than 200 poor boys and
girls who were completely dependent on the bene-
volence of the home’s sponsors. Agencies such as the
Children’s Home, although their endeavours were
overshadowed for years by the conflicts waged by the
warlords, deserve our unwavering admiration. Boys
and girls slept in separate dormitories. They were
taught by teachers trained in cultural subjects,
handicrafts, carpentry and so forth. On the walls of
the Children’s Home, the children’s school produc-
256
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002

Social work in today’s China
actions undertaken for the public good, prevent from
change and collapse. It is time to stop the calamity
and to welcome harmony; time and tide wait for no
man; don’t let the poor and suffering wait so long.
Cordially yours. (Weekly of Providing Disaster
Relief, 1920)
of social automatism and social democracy.
However, these policies were not put into
practice at that time.
As for the Communist Party Government, it organised
a considerable amount of social work in the areas of
liberation; for example, it gave support to soldiers and
their families, helped the needy, provided poor relief,
supported vulnerable groups and punished evil-doers.
It showed great concerning of life of the people and
improving job methods, and so on. The film Girl with
White Hair reflected exactly the kind of official-
practical social work being done by the Communist
government.
There were some 221 celebrities from all walks of life
who signed the petition to express their support of its
proposals. Numerous people generously contributed
funds to help the refugees.
Official-educational social work
There were no state-sponsored universities offering
courses in social work in the early stages of this period
– not until the end of the 1920s. After that, Jinan
University, Nanjing Central University and Tsinghua
University each started an education programme.
Although the public universities offering social work
education accounted for only a small number of
students, their influence cannot be ignored. Because of
their efforts, private social work education acquired
new meaning: 1) it received, if indirectly, official
support; 2) social work education gained a legal
position; 3) the universities helped to shape a unified
theory and practice of social work; and 4) by spreading
social work values, social-cultural change was
promoted in contemporary China.
In the revolutionary base area, and areas of
liberation under the leadership of the Chinese Com-
munist Party, there were a number of schools, such as
Shanbei Public School, Anti-Japan College, Yanan
University, Military and the Political University, that
were engaged in similar social work programmes to
train revolutionary social workers (Mouhau Lu, 1988).
Summary
The characteristics of social work in China during this
stage are as follows:
1) It began with private social work education; the
development of Chinese social work was
promoted by teaching and spreading values,
knowledge and professional skills of social work.
The civil war and the existence of two separate
regimes in the country disrupted the develop-
ment of social work during this period; never-
theless, there was a tangible influence on the
professional and institutional development of
social work during this time.
2) Revolutionary war and civil war led to dis-union
of Chinese social work and blocked the develop-
ment of professional and institutional social
work in China.
3) During this stage, Chinese social work had a
bright feature of military and revolution.
The abolition of social work education in China
Official-practical social work
With the founding of the New China in 1949, there
was much that needed to be accomplished. The central
government showed its maturity and solidity by
constituting a range of firm economic, political and
foreign policies. However, in the area of education
some unfortunate decisions were made, among the
most absurd being the abolition of sociology in 1952.
As we have already seen, social work and sociology
were introduced into China at the same time, with
social work attached to the sociology departments. As
a result, when the university sociology departments
were abolished, social work disappeared, too.
Two regimes held sway in China prior to 1949: the
Guomindang government and the Communist Party
Government. There was no social department in the
Guomindang government until 1940 because of the
ongoing civil war. Yet, in 1944 the minister of the new
Social Department, Gu Zhenggang, put forward three
basic proposals that were to serve as the guidelines for
social administration:
1) the establishment of social policies based on the
Three People’s Principles to complete the social
construction of China;
2) the founding of the system of social admini-
stration and social enterprise to promote the
smooth development of social work and social
administration;
Why did the education sector decide to abolish
sociology at that time? There were four main reasons.
1) Following blindly the leadership of the Soviet
Union. At the beginning of building the New
China, the government adopted the ‘lean to one
3) the training of social work professionals in social
work and administration to consolidate the basis
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002
257

Xia & Guo
side’ policy; i.e. to learn about everything from
Foreign Affairs, was given the responsibility for
institutionalising social work. The Home Department
was forcibly disbanded during the ‘cultural revo-
lution’, but was later reinstated under the new name of
the Ministry of Civil Affairs and was put in charge of
managing the civil affairs sector. The responsibility for
social work fell to the Ministry of Personnel, which
administrated social security programmes for city
employees.
In 1951 the State Council passed the People’s
Republic of China Labour Insurance Statute and began
to implement a relatively comprehensive social
insurance programme that included coverage for the
elderly, as well as for injuries, disease, death and for the
survivors of the deceased. Business enterprises or those
representing capital contributed 3% of the total cost for
setting up a labour insurance fund. When employees
retired they could obtain different levels of retirement
pension from the fund. Other insurance benefits were
paid for by business enterprises in accordance with a
payments standard regulated by the government.
From the statute, we can see the following
characteristics of the social security system in China
during this period.
our ‘Soviet Brother’. The Soviet Union abol-
ished sociology soon after the victory of the
October Revolution; it regarded sociology as
‘bourgeois pseudo-science’. Consequently, there
was no longer room for the development of
sociology in China.
2) The idea that historical materialism could
replace sociology. The leading opinion was that
historical materialism was a science and
sociology was not. By applying the ideas of
historical materialism, all kinds of social prob-
lems could be resolved, so it did not matter if
there was no sociology in China.
3) A misconception of the socialist society. It was
said that as there were no longer any problems in
the socialist society, sociology was useless.
4) Confusing social work with sociology. In fact,
the former is a kind of professional education
whereas the latter is a sort of academic
education. These are not the same thing.
These, then, were the reasons why sociology was
abolished, and along with it social work education as it
existed in China at that time.
1) The starting point for the social security benefit
level in China was relatively high. For example,
the highest retirement pension was equivalent to
75% of employees’ standard wage before they
retired; moreover, the substitute rate reached
100% for members of the revolutionary cadres.
2) The Chinese social security system was linked to
employment. The right to receive a retirement
pension and other benefits was wholly dependent
on the length of time in employment and the
level of benefits directly connected with the
employee’s income before retirement.
3) The state was solely responsible for the social
security fund; employees need not have
contributed to the fund. Retirement pension and
other related benefits were paid for by business
enterprises in accordance with the level of real
consumption. These expenses were charged to
the cost of running the enterprise and led to such
a heavy financial burden that the enterprises lost
the motivation for improving productivity.
But the fact that social work education was
abolished in the universities did not mean the discon-
tinuation of social work in China. Both at the
institutional level and the voluntary level, the develop-
ment of social work practice was enhanced in the
developmental stage coinciding with the construction
of the New China.
Official-practical social work
Even in ancient China there was always an officer in
charge of social work, called the ‘Situ’. From the T’ang
Yu, Yin Shang and Xi Chou dynasties to the Chunqiu
Zhangguo dynasty, the post of ‘Situ’ existed to assist the
emperor in settling the nation and stabilising the state. In
the Ch’in and Han dynasties, the ‘Situ’ was replaced by
the ‘Cheng Xiang’, while the post of ‘Min Cao’ was
formed to help the ‘Cheng Xiang’ manage civil affairs.
During the time of the Three Nations, Two Jins and
South and North dynasties, the official positions of
‘Shang Shu’, ‘Hu Cao’, ‘Zuo Min’ and ‘Si Dai’ were in
force to handle civil affairs. The Sui and T’ang dynasties
each had a Board of Revenue and Population, and in the
Song Dynasty there was a Department of Revenue and
Population to run the civil administrative affairs. A
Department of Revenue and Population administered
civil affairs in the Yuan and Qing governments as well. It
was the Qing government that first established a Ministry
of Civil Affairs in Guang Xu’s 32nd year (1906).
Nevertheless, at the time this system was certainly
useful for maintaining social stabilisation. At the end
of the 1960s, for a number of historical reasons social
insurance became the sole responsibility of the
business enterprises; thus, social insurance evolved
into a concern of business enterprises in China.
In June 1978, the State Council passed two new
statutes: ‘Provisional Statue about Arrangements for
Cadres with Diseases and Injuries’, and ‘Temporary
Regulation of Employee Retirement’. These statutes
After the founding of the New China, the Home
Department, the domestic equivalent to the Ministry of
258
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002

Social work in today’s China
prescribed that men could retire when reaching the age
of 60 and women the age of 50 if they had a
continuous length of service for more than ten years.
However, the retirement pension was still to be paid by
the business enterprises.
In 1984, a reform was initiated providing for a
comprehensive social plan for meeting the expenses
incurred by business enterprises for employee
retirement pension. This reform measure has signifi-
cantly reduced the financial burden of the business
enterprises and guaranteed financial resources for
retirement pension. At the same time, it further
legitimised the central government’s withdrawal from
the field of social security.
voluntary-practical social work continued to be
developed in all social fields because people had
acquired new life aspirations and new social values
with the founding of the New China. In the first three
years, New China successfully eliminated some
socially harmful phenomena, such as prostitution,
gambling, drug addiction, laziness and disease.
Chinese social work practice surprised the world for
its comprehensiveness and effectiveness.
Summary
The main characteristics in social work during this
period are as follows.
1) Because social work had been abolished, two
generations of people did not know what social
work was. However, under the promotion of
various governments, practical social work
developed rapidly and made great strides.
2) The State and ‘units’ became the main body of
social work. In fact, national cadres and ‘units’
leaders were, broadly speaking, social workers.
Institutional collectivism and equality eliminated
the phenomenon of social polarisation, with the
result that social problems were on the decline.
Thus the demand for professional social work
was not very strong.
3) Because of the lack of professional social work
education and professional supervision, social
work practice was of an empirical kind, outdated
and insensitive in its methods; particularly, it
lacked the core values of social work and a
professional ethical spirit.
4) The reinstatement of sociology in the 1980s
impelled research on Chinese social problems; at
the same time, it awakened the people’s memory
about social work. Thus, a base was formed for the
reinstatement and reconstruction of social work.
Voluntary-practical social work
Although China is an organised society, civilian
organisations were rare during this period. The three
largest civilian organisations are still the Women’s
Federation, the labour union and the Communist Youth
League. In essence, these are semi-governmental
organisations. Thus, what they accomplished in social
work practice generally reflected the intentions of the
government; i.e. it was in effect institutionalised social
work. In fact, these organisations filled the roles of
social worker and dispatcher of social welfare
programmes. According to the labour insurance
regulation, the Women’s Federation was in charge of
women’s welfare; the labour union was responsible for
employees’ welfare; and the Communist Youth League
was concerned with the affairs of youth. For other
vulnerable social groups, such as the elderly and
disabled people, the Ministry of Civil Affairs had the
responsibility for their welfare. In terms of welfare
delivery, these civilian organisations filled the same
role as that of the Ministry of Civil Affairs.
Voluntary-practice social work in China at this time
was manifested mainly through the relief activities of
business enterprises and non-profit organisations or
‘units’. In China, ‘units’ means people belong to them
besides family. This period was largely characterised
by the planned-economy system. Business enterprises
and ‘units’, being part of the state, fulfilled
comprehensive state functions. Normally, the ‘units’
provided minimum lifetime security benefits for all
employees and their families. Thus, except for ‘the
three-year period of difficulty’ in the 1960s, basically
no one starved to death in China during this period,
and there were no beggars or vagrants.
Social work's recovery and reconstruction in today's
China
Official-educational social work
In the late 1980s, along with the recovery and
reconstruction of sociology in China’s universities
was the recovery and reconstruction of social work. In
1987, the Ministry of Civil Affairs got together with
the State Education Committee to discuss the
reinstatement of social work education. They
eventually reached a joint decision: the Ministry of
Civil Affairs was to invest one million yuan of RMB
(people’s currency) in the Department of Sociology in
Peking University for the purpose of reinstating and
building up social work professional education. As one
of the principals involved in the rebuilding of social
In the middle of this period, some collectivist ideas,
such as ‘I do for others, others do for me’ and the
Leifeng spirit as in ‘be happy to help others’, were
strongly promoted. It was a time in which the political
system and public sentiment were in harmony.
Although social work was officially abolished,
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002
259

Xia & Guo
work as a profession, this author was a happy witness
to this extraordinary event.
Voluntary-educational social work
In the summer of 1988, on the invitation of the
Asian-Pacific Association of Social Work Education,
Professors Yuan Fan, Wang Sibin and I visited several
universities and institutions engaged in social work
education in Hong Kong. The purpose of the visit was
to prepare a professional training programme and
curriculum for social work in general and to make
concrete preparations for the Asian-Pacific Area
Social Work Education Seminar to be held in Peking
University in December of that year.
Accompanying the development of the private college
sector, some private colleges also engaged in building
up the social work profession and provided social
work education to meet to the demands of social
development. An example is the Haidian Corres-
pondence College, which is now a member of the
Chinese Association of Social Work Education.
Official-practical social work
The Seminar was held in Peking University
according to schedule. Some 160 delegates, all of
whom were engaged in social work education or social
work practice, attended the seminar and workshops.
Over 100 of the delegates came from China. As one of
the joint chairmen of the seminar, as well as one of the
speakers and organisers, this author can say without
doubt that the seminar made a vital contribution to
social work education in China. It not only taught the
Chinese delegates much about the nature of social
work and the kind of social work that today’s China
needs, but it also planted the seeds of social work in
the mother earth of China.
After the seminar, the universities of Jilin, Xiamen
and Shanghai have, one after the other, built up the
social work profession. At the end of the year 2000
there were more than 70 public colleges engaged in
social work education. The training goals and
curriculum arrangements at these universities focus
on three different levels: the macro level, the mezzo
level and the micro level. In some universities, such as
Peking University, social work education is at the
macro level, focusing on social administration, social
planning, social policy analysis and social welfare
system building. In others, such as China Renmin
University, social work education is at the mezzo
level, with an emphasis on social work with families,
in industry and schools and institutional development.
Lastly, in other universities or colleges, such as the
China Youth Politic College, social work focuses on
the micro level, which includes case-work, special
social group counselling and individual potential
development. Of course, graduate social workers are
assigned different duties depending on which level
was the focus of their social work education.
Graduates well-trained at the macro level mostly work
in the social policy and social research sectors; those
trained at the mezzo level choose social work related
to institutions and business enterprises; and lastly,
students who have mastered skills on the micro level
work mostly in the local social services.
During this period official-practical social work was
mainly concerned with exploring the social security
system, with the exception of traditional civil relief
work. Many city employees were facing layoff and
unemployment, and were in danger of losing their
basic life security as an indirect result of the city
economic-system reform, the establishment of a
market economy and the withdrawal of the ‘units’
security system in the planning time. A precondition
for a smoothly operating market economy that does
not endanger social stability is to solve the social
security problems facing the city employees.
Therefore, since the 1990s the Chinese government
has successively strengthened the legislation per-
taining to social security.
Social insurance for business enterprise employees
In June 1991 the State Council passed the ‘Decision on
the Reform of Enterprise Employees’ Retirement
Pension System’. Its main provisions include: 1) to set
up a three-tier retirement pension system – the state’s
obligatory basic pension insurance, the corporations’
supplementary pension insurance and personal savings
insurance; 2) to introduce a multiple-channel
mechanism for raising funds whereby pension fees are
shared by the state, ‘units’ and individuals on a fair
basis, that is to say, individuals have to pay their share of
their retirement pension benefits; 3) to change the pay-
as-you-go method for pension fees and determine the
principles of payment and benefit here and now.
In March 1995, the State Council passed the
‘Notification of Deepening Reform in Enterprise
Employees Pension Insurance System’, which stipu-
lated that the retirement pension insurance scheme for
employees of business enterprises is to implement the
principle of social planning viewed as a whole in
combination with personal accounts, and which
provided two concrete alternative methods of
implementation.
In July 1997, the State Council passed the ‘Decision
to Establish a Unified Retirement Pension Insurance
System for Business Enterprise Employees’; and in
January 1999 the State Council passed the ‘Provisional
260
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002

Social work in today’s China
Statute for Levying Social Insurance Fees’. Thus the
framework for the enterprise retirement-pension
insurance system in China came into being.
ment’s role is organisation and leadership; the
peasants can choose of their own free will whether
or not to participate in the programme. There are three
main characteristics of the programme:
1.
2.
3.
The necessary funds are contributed mainly by
individuals and supplemented by subsidies from
the collective with additional support through
state policy.
The establishment of personal accounts, the
implementation of a reserve fund and the deter-
mination of the payment criterion in terms of the
amount of available funds.
The integration of the pension insurance pro-
gramme among various groups of people in the
countryside, including farm workers, peasants
and rural merchants, and the implementation of a
uniform system with an unchangeable code
consistent management of the insured. In short,
the programme emphasises the self-reliance of
the peasants and does not add to the state’s
financial burden.
Pension insurance system for the staff in the state sectors
and in the non-profit organisation `units'
The pension insurance system for state employees and
non-profit ‘units’ differs from that of the business
enterprises. Its main feature is that employees do not
make pension insurance payments; these are paid by the
state or the non-profit ‘units’. Pension benefit payments
depend on the employee’s basic salary at the time of
retirement and length of employment. State civil
servants are paid a basic salary plus an additional
salary for length of service length, and when they retire,
their post salary and rank salary are granted pro rata.
Staff members in the non-profit ‘units’ are paid pro rata
for the sum of their post salaries plus allowances. The
proportions are shown in the following tables.
Table 1. Drawing ratio of pension benefits for civil servants, according to
position and rank salary.
So, social pension insurance in the countryside is more
of a self-security system for peasants than a social
security system. However, the government has played a
crucial role in mobilising, organising and coordinating
activities. The programme is still attractive to peasants
because of rural family planning, decreasing land
resources and the unwillingness of rural young people
to support their elderly parents. After ten years’
development, there are now some 80 million people
in the countryside participating in the programme and
pension funds have reached 16 billion yuan of RMB.
As a matter of fact, half a million peasants have now
begun to draw their pension benefits. In general, there
are agencies in all areas of implementation, basically
forming six levels within the management system and
service network, including department, province,
county, town and village.
Service length
Drawing ratio
<10 years 10±20 yrs 20±30 yrs 30±35 yrs >35 yrs
40% 60% 75% 82% 88%
Table 2. Drawing ratio of pension benefits for staff in non-profit `units', salary
plus allowance.
Service length
Drawing ratio
<10 years 10±20 yrs 20±30 yrs 30±35 yrs >35 yrs
50% 70% 80% 85% 90%
From the above tables we can see that there is an
appreciable difference between the welfare treatment
of civil servants and that of non-profit ‘units’ staff.
Although the drawing ratios of the former are only
slightly less than those of the latter, only the first
group is qualified to receive both a total basic salary
and an additional salary based on length of service.
At present the system covers some 30 million
people. To meet the needs involved in the setting up of
a socialist market-economy system, the pension
insurance system will be reformed accordingly.
Supplementary pension insurance of the business
enterprises
Supplement pension insurance is the employer’s
responsibility. It must meet the following conditions:
1) the employer must join the basic pension-insurance
programme and have fulfilled its contribution duty; 2)
the insurance scheme must be in accord with the basic
regulations stipulated by the state. The scheme
encourages the individual to share in paying part of
the fees. Money from ‘units’ and individuals are
collected together called the ‘model of fund planning
as a whole’ and managed by personal accounts. The
money in personal accounts belongs to the individual
holding the account. Employees can withdraw the whole
amount at one time, or portion out their withdrawals
Pension insurance in the countryside
Social pension insurance in the countryside is a social
policy that is promoted by the Chinese government for
the purpose of resolving the problem of elderly
peasants. The policy was approved by the State
Council in 1991. Its basic principle is that the social
security level must be adjusted to the development
level of production and with the enduring ability of the
parties. Social pension insurance must be combined
with family support, land security and social relief. In
implementing rural pension insurance, the govern-
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002
261

Xia & Guo
during their retirement. The money in personal accounts
is transferred when the employee changes jobs.
element in training social work skills.
4) The continued development of Chinese social
work is limited by the degree of development of
the Chinese social welfare system. As the
Chinese economy attains the level of the
developed countries, the Chinese social welfare
system will necessarily become more stable and
more financially viable. So, as the delivery
system for social welfare, social work in China
has a tremendous market.
Voluntary-practical social work
Domestic political struggle induced the transformation
of the Chinese society and further created the decon-
struction of the total state or absolute society. Market-
ing exchange based on the above has created room for
the emergence and development of a truly civilian
organisation. Thus, voluntary-practical social work has
grown rapidly in China along with the emergence and
development of a civilian organisation. Today, there are
thousands of voluntary organisations throughout the
whole of China. These can be divided into five main
categories: the Chinese Youth Volunteer Association,
the Chinese Community Volunteer Association, the
Chinese Environmentalist Volunteer Association, the
Chinese Volunteer Association for the Protection of
Endangered Species, and the International Volunteer.
Membership in these volunteer organisations may
overlap. They have provided a rich and varied voluntary
social work practice in a wide range of social work
fields. They have promoted social work values,
strengthened the reputation of professional social work
and laid the foundation for social work education.
Conclusions
• The road to development of social work in China is
a steep one with many twists and turns. In less than
100 years Chinese social work has experienced all
three stages of the ‘positive-negative-integrative’
pattern of development, which in Hegelian
philosophy is believed to be universal.
• The political context for Chinese social work has
changed over the years, as well, with the result that
the social work discourse has also changed, not only
between eras but also within one and the same era.
This makes it is a very challenging task to analyse
the historical development and features of
contemporary Chinese social work.
• Chinese social work is still in its elementary
developmental stage; it is still seeking to achieve a
balance between the two poles of globalisation and
localisation. To fully grasp the current discourse on
Chinese social work, one must apply the principles
of discourse analysis even on the local level.
Summary
The characteristics of social work in this stage are the
following:
1) There is an increasing professional identification
among traditional social work groups, such as
social workers in the civil affair sectors, women
league organisations, labour unions and youth
league organisations. They share the values and
ideas of social work, and seek professional
knowledge and basic skills to improve their work.
2) Social work education reflects the trends of
normalisation, professionalism and globalisation.
In the mid- and late 1990s, the Chinese Association
of Social Workers and the Chinese Association of
Social Work Education were established. These
organisations promote the establishment of norms
of behaviour for social workers in social work
education. Along with greater academic exchange
and increasing international contacts in the field of
social work, Chinese social work education is
striding towards globalisation but in accordance
with conditions at the local level.
•
Social work in China has a tremendous market in
both the public and private sectors. As with the
development of the social security system, institu-
tional social work in China is expected to make great
progress in the near future. In both the public and
private sectors, the goals of social work are to
enhance the Chinese people’s standard of living.
In the last analysis, the development of Chinese
social work depends on increased professionalisation
and a more profound institutionalisation. By mid-
century, Chinese social work can be expected to have
attained its goals in these two respects.
•
References
Actuality Challenge Prospect (1988). Peking, Peking University.
Fang Yuan (1988). Social Work Education and Socialist
Modernization Construction in China. Actuality Challenge
Prospect, Peking University Press.
Good Paper, Peiping Poor Children’s Home Publication 1919
No. 3.
Mouhau Lu (1988). Development of Chinese Social Work
Education. Actuality Challenge Prospect 1988, Peking
University.
Weekly of Providing Disaster Relief (1920). First Issue,
October. North China Association of Relief Publication.
3) Teaching social work values and doing fieldwork
are highly regarded by most social work
institutions. Social work educators at different
levels regard the teaching of values as the basis
for social work and regard fieldwork as the key
262
ß Blackwell Publishers Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare 2002