4
E. Bolyog-Nagy et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
lengths and bond angles within the pta ligand do not differ signif-
icantly from those found in [RuCl2(pta)(
6-p-cymene)]. The exo-
cyclic C-O bond in the Ru(
2-O2CO) unit with O(3)-C(10) = 1.25
g
g
Ru
Ru
O
Na2CO3 or K2CO3
H2O, RT
(2) Å is shorter than the two endocyclic C-O distances, O(1)–C
P
P
Cl
O
Cl
N
N
(10) = 1.26(2) Å and O(2)–C(10) = 1.36(2) Å. The planar arrange-
C
ment of the Ru(g
2-O2CO) fragment is indicated by the sums of
N
N
N
N
O
the angles within the four membered ring (359.79°) and around
the carbon atom (359.89°) both of which are essentially 360°. This
plane is approximately perpendicular to the Ru-P bond: O(1)–Ru
(1)–P(1) = 81.9°, and O(2)–Ru(1)–P(1) = 86.1°. All parameters are
in good agreement with values determined previously for com-
Scheme 3. Formation of [Ru(
g
2-O2CO)(pta)( 6-p-cymene)].
g
of PPh3 the reaction needed 3 h using 10% water-acetone mixture
as solvent [41]. [Ru(
2-O2CO){(Cy)2P(1-methylnaphtyl)}(g6
C6H6)] was formed in ten minutes upon stirring a mixture consist-
ing of [RuCl2{(Cy)2P(1-methyl-naphtyl)}(
6-C6H6)], NaHCO3 and
methanol [42]. As demonstrated by Fig. 2, the reaction of [RuCl2
(pta)(
6-p-cymene)] and Na2CO3 in aqueous solution requires only
15 min to go to completion.
[Ru(
2-O2CO)(pta)( 6-p-cymene)] (as dihydrate) could be iso-
plexes related to [Ru(g g
2-O2CO)(pta)( 6-p-cymene)] but having
g
-
various arene and phosphine ligands [40–42].
g
3.2. Redox isomerization of allylic alcohols with [RuCl2(pta)(g
6-p-
g
cymene)] and [Ru(g g
2-O2CO)(pta)( 6-p-cymene)] catalysts
g
g
lated in solid form in reaction either with Na2CO3 or with K2CO3.
In the latter case the carbonato-complex was obtained with 80%
yield; the product showed excellent elemental analysis. The pres-
ence of coordinated carbonate ligand is also shown by the singlet
13C NMR resonance at 166.8 ppm (s, CD3OD). Furthermore, the
infrared spectrum displays sharp absorbances at 1663 cmꢀ1 and
1613 cmꢀ1 characteristic for coordinated carbonate.
Redox isomerization of allylic alcohols was studied earlier with
[RuCl2(bmim)(
6-p-cymene)] catalyst under an H2 atmosphere
g
(1 bar) [17]. In these reactions the catalyst was dissolved in aque-
ous phosphate buffer solutions of various pH while the neat sub-
strate comprised the organic phase. In such a biphasic system
(Scheme 4, L = bmim), at pH = 6.9 reaction of oct-1-en-3-ol yielded
81% octan-3-one and 14% octan-3-ol (TOF = 46.4 hꢀ1; turnover fre-
quency (TOF) = mol reacted substrate ꢂ (mol catalyst)ꢀ1 ꢂ hꢀ1).
Under otherwise identical reaction conditions but with [RuCl2
Upon layering hexane onto a chloroform solution of [Ru(g2
-
O2CO)(pta)(
g
6-p-cymene)]ꢁ2H2O (1) X-ray quality crystals could
(pta)(g
6-p-cymene)] as catalyst, redox isomerization of oct-1-en-
3-ol (Scheme 4, L = pta) at pH = 7.0 resulted in 98% conversion in
1 h (TOF = 98.0 hꢀ1) with 81% octan-3-one and 17% octan-3-ol as
products.
be obtained at ꢀ18 °C overnight (lemon yellow plates). Single crys-
tal X-ray diffraction resulted in the solid state structure of the com-
plex as shown on Fig. 3.
The asymmetric unit contains one molecule of the Ru-complex
and two water molecules and the structure is stabilized by an
extended H-bond network. The Ru(II) atom is surrounded by a
p-cymene ligand, a bidentate carbonate ion and a phosphine ligand
in a piano-stool configuration. Pta is linked through its P atom with
a Ru—P bond length of 2.309(5) Å. This bond is somewhat longer
The product ratio remained essentially the same (82% ketone
and 18% saturated alcohol) in the next two hours of the reaction
showing that there was no catalytic hydrogenation of the ketone
product despite the hydrogen atmosphere. These data also showed,
that albeit [RuCl2(pta)(
g
6-p-cymene)] was a more active catalyst
g
6-p-cymene)], i.e. 2.296(2) and
than [RuCl2(bmim)(
g
6-p-cymene)], there was no significant differ-
than those found for [RuCl2(pta)(
2.298(3) Å in the two molecules in the asymmetric unit [33]. Bond
ence in selectivity, i.e. in the product distribution.
Selective isomerization of allylic alcohols to ketones (Scheme 5)
can be expected from reactions in the absence of reducing agents
such as e.g. H2.
Indeed, we have shown earlier that several CpRu(II)-complexes
[18–21] were able to catalyze selective formation of octan-3-one
from oct-1-en-3-ol in the absence of H2; the conversions varied
as a function of the pH of the aqueous phase. Based on this expe-
rience, we have also attempted isomerization of oct-1-en-3-ol
under an inert atmosphere (Ar) with [RuCl2(pta)(g
6-p-cymene)]
as catalyst dissolved in phosphate buffer solutions of various pH
(Fig. 4).
The results showed that in strongly basic solutions (pH 11–12)
[RuCl2(pta)(g
6-p-cymene)] was an effective and selective catalyst
for redox isomerization of oct-1-en-3-ol – full conversion of the
substrate was achieved in 1 h at 80 °C with octan-3-one as the sole
product. However, the reaction proceeded only very slowly in solu-
tions with pH < 8.5. The only report in the literature on the appli-
cation of [RuCl2(pta-MeOBn)(g
6-p-cymene)]Cl for catalysis of
redox isomerization of oct-1-en-3-ol also describes the use of a
strong base, Cs2CO3, however, the reaction was slow with 38%
conversion in 8 h at 75 °C, corresponding to TOF = 2.7 hꢀ1 [25]. In
Fig. 3. ORTEP drawing of [Ru(
g
2-O2CO)(pta)(
g
6-p-cymene)]ꢁ2H2O (1) showing 50%
C5H11
C5H11
C5H11
[RuCl2(L)(p-cymene)]
p(H2) = 1bar; 80oC;
probability thermal ellipsoids. The H2O molecules have been omitted for clarity.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Ru(1)–P(1), 2.309(5); Ru(1)–O(1), 2.115
(12); Ru(1)–O(2), 2.073(13); O(1)–C(10), 1.26(2); O(2)–C(10), 1.36(2); O(3)–C(10),
1.25(2) O(1)–Ru(1)–O(2), 62.4(5); C(10)–O(1)–Ru(1), 93.4(12); C(10)–O(2)–Ru(1),
92.4(13); O(1)–C(10)–O(2), 111.6(18); O(1)–C(10)–O(3), 126(2); O(2)–C(10)–O(3),
122(2); O(1)–Ru(1)–P(1), 81.9(4); O(2)–Ru(1)–P(1), 86.1(4).
+
OH
OH
O
Scheme 4. Redox isomerization and hydrogenation of oct-1-en-3-ol catalyzed by
[RuCl2(L)(
6-p-cymene)].
g