L. Menini et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 6401–6404
6403
CuII
-H+
-CuI
para-bromoaromatics usually have greater commercial
OCuII
.
OH
significance.4
O
2a
A
B
The extremely high chemoselectivity of this reaction for
monobromination products is remarkable. For all sub-
strates studied, a combined selectivity for monobromo-
phenols was 97–99%. Although a substitution of the
ortho-hydrogen in eugenol occurs smoothly, no further
ortho-bromination of para-bromophenols 2b–5b, having
ortho-positions available, has been observed even at
longer reaction times. Thus, the presence of the electron
withdrawing bromine atom, attached to the aromatic
nucleus in the primarily formed products, virtually sup-
presses their further bromination, conferring such a high
monoselectivity on the process. The fact that electron-
poor phenol para-nitrophenol shows no reactivity under
similar conditions (run 7) collaborates with this explana-
tion of the high selectivity to monobrominated products.
CuIIBr2
-CuIBr
.
Br
OH
Br
O
O
2b
Scheme 3.
D
C
Most of the copper-catalyzed oxidations are thought to
proceed via a one-electron oxidation of phenolate by
CuII to the corresponding phenoxy radical.19 Thus, we
suggest the formation of phenoxy radical B, probably,
from CuII (phenolate) complex A or via the direct oxida-
tion of phenol by CuII. Tautomeric cyclohexadienyl
radical C reacts with CuBr2 resulting in CuBr and bro-
minated product D, whose tautomerization gives para-
bromophenol 2b. Re-oxidation of Cu(I) complexes by
dioxygen completes a catalytic cycle. In the absence of
dioxygen under an inert atmosphere, a rapid precipita-
tion of CuBr occurs and the reaction becomes stagnated.
Non-phenolic compounds, both with electron withdraw-
ing and with electron donating groups, that is, nitroben-
zene and toluene, also undergo no transformation at all
under the conditions used for the oxybromination of
substrates 1a–5a (runs 8 and 9). Thus, the method is
highly substrate specific and could be used for the
monobromination of phenols in the mixtures with other
aromatics. Another practical advantage of this catalyst
is its ability to promote with substituted phenols exclu-
sively their nuclear bromination, with neither side-bro-
mination nor oxidation products being observed.
In general, several concurrent transformations can occur
with the tautomeric phenoxy and cyclohexadienyl radi-
cals, such as carbon-carbon and carbon-oxygen cou-
pling to afford diphenoquinones, dihydroxybiphenyls
or polyphenylene ethers.19 Therefore, a high chemose-
lectivity of the reaction described in this work is espe-
cially attractive. It seems that a rate determining step
of the reaction is the formation of radicals B and C,
whereas their bromination occurs faster. Indeed, the
reaction is first-order in copper, but it does not depend
on the concentration of bromide ions. Thus, radicals C
are rapidly trapped by bromine atoms and have no time
for other transformations.
We studied the oxybromination of thymol (5a) in more
details and found that the reaction is approximately first
order in the CuII concentration. On the other hand,
amounts of bromide ions virtually have no effect on
the initial reaction rates and reaction selectivity. Only
when near- or sub-stoichiometric initial bromide con-
centrations are used, the reaction occurs slower at high
substrate conversions. It suggests a pseudo-zero order
of the reaction on bromide ions under these conditions.
Thus, the use of LiBr can be decreased to near stoichi-
ometric amounts (run 6). It should be remembered,
however, that although the dissolved CuI species can
be easily re-oxidized by dioxygen, CuBr is well soluble
in acetic acid only in the presence of an excess of bro-
mine ions. Thus, a precipitation of CuBr at the end of
the reaction for the lack of bromide ions should be
avoided. To keep CuI in the solution and to allow its fast
re-oxidation, a sufficient excess of bromide ions (Br/
Cu P 2/1) has to remain in the reaction solutions after
a complete substrate conversion.
The electron transfer from phenolate to CuII should be
favored by electron donating groups attached to aro-
matic nucleus; therefore, eugenol, meta-cresol, guaiacol,
and thymol are more reactive than phenol itself. On the
other hand, para-nitrophenol as well as primarily
formed monobrominated phenols, all having electron
withdrawing substituents, undergo no bromination at
all under similar conditions. This feature of the process
seems to account for its extremely high monoselectivity.
Within the proposed mechanistic scheme, it also turns
understandable why non-phenolic compounds are not
reactive in oxybromination.
Kinetic data on the oxybromination of thymol obtained
at different temperatures and expressed by means of
the Arrhenius equation yield the activation energy of
ca. 70 kJ molÀ1 in the range of 40–100 °C. This value
is considerably higher than those found for the oxy-
chlorination of thymol (13 kJ molÀ1) and eugenol
(25 kJ molÀ1).18 However, we suppose that the oxybro-
mination of phenols can also be described as a free-rad-
ical process. A proposed mechanism is presented in
Scheme 3 using for simplicity phenol itself as the
substrate.
In summary, we have developed a highly selective Cu-
catalyzed process for the oxidative nuclear monobro-
mination of phenol and electron-rich phenolic com-
pounds under mild aerobic conditions. The use of an
inexpensive copper catalyst, lithium bromide, as a
source of bromine and dioxygen as a final oxidant is a
significant practical advantage. This simple and low
cost method provides a new attractive entry to the syn-
thesis of high-priced low-volume bromoaromatics with
remarkable atom economy and selectivity. Further stud-