6
0 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2018
Experimental
and then methanol (5 mL) was added. The solution of VOSO was then
4
1
added to a solution of H L (0.165 g, 0.5 mmol) in methanol (20 mL)
The solvents used in the reactions were of reagent grade (E. Merck,
Kolkata, India) and were purified and dried using previously reported
2
and the mixture was refluxed for 15 min. The dark brown-coloured
solid product was separated by filtration and the solid mass was
dissolved in dichloromethane. Single crystals were obtained by slow
evaporation of the solvent. Isolated yield: 0.19 g (65%); Anal. calcd
for C H N O V (398.27): C, 57.30; H, 3.29; N, 10.55; found: C, 57.34;
43
procedures. VOSO .5H O was purchased from E. Merck (Kolkata,
4
2
India) and was used as received. The ligands 2-({2-aminoaryl}
diazenyl) phenol were prepared following previously reported
3
8
procedures. Microanalyses (C, H, N) were performed using a Perkin-
Elmer 2400 C, H, N, S/O series II elemental analyser. IR spectra
were recorded as KBr pellets on a Perkin-Elmer L120-00A FT-IR
19 13
3
4
−1
−1
H, 3.18; N, 10.68%; UV-Vis spectrum (CH Cl ): l (ε, M cm ) 486
8413), 375 (16329), 343 (20760), 240 (23299); IR (KBr) (ν /cm ):
2
2
max
sh
−1
(
max
1
438 (N=N), 1618 (C=N), 3450 (O−Η), 978 (V=O).
spectrometer. Electronic spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-
2
3
2
1
[(L )VO] (2b) and [(L )VO] (2c): Complexes [(L )VO] (2b) and
1800 PC spectrophotometer. H NMR spectra were obtained on a
3
2
3
1
[(L )VO] (2c) were prepared using H L and H L in place of H L ,
Bruker 400 NMR spectrometer in CDCl3 using tetramethylsilane
TMS) as internal standard. Electrochemical measurements
2
2
2
respectively.
(
[
(2-Hydroxy-6-(2-(2-oxido-4-methyl-phenyl)diazenylphenylimino)
were made under dinitrogen using a CH instruments model 600D
potentiostat. A platinum disc working electrode, a platinum wire
auxiliary electrode and an aqueous saturated calomel reference
electrode (SCE) were used in a three-electrode configuration. All
electrochemical data were collected at 298 K and are uncorrected for
junction potentials. 2,3-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde, the human breast
cancer cells (MCF7 and MDA-MB-231), DMEM medium and HCT116
colon cancer cells, RPMI-1650 medium, penicillin (100 μg mL ) and
streptomycin sulfate (100 μg mL ) were all purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich (USA), as was 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS).
2
methylphenolate)oxidovanadium(IV)-N,N,O,O] [(L )VO] (2b): Isolated
yield: 0.18 g (61%); Anal. calcd for C20 V (412.32): C, 58.26; H,
3.67; N, 10.19; found: C, 58.12; H, 3.63; N, 10.23%; UV-Vis spectrum
(CH Cl ): l (ε, M cm ) 489 (12664), 378 (21382), 348 (25093), 243
(26094); IR (KBr) (νmax/cm ): 1432 (N=N), 1611 (C=N), 3446 (O−Η),
978 (V=O).
H N O
15 3 4
−1
−1
sh
2
2
max
−1
−1
[(2-Hydroxy-6-(2-(2-oxido-4-chloro-phenyl)diazenylphenylimino)
−1
3
methylphenolate)oxidovanadium(IV)-N,N,O,O] [(L )VO] (2c): Isolated
yield: 0.19 mg (62%); Anal. calcd for C H N O ClV (432.73): C, 52.73;
19
12
3
4
All of the ligands 1a, 1b and 1c were prepared following similar
procedures. A representative procedure for 1a is given below.
H, 2.80; N, 9.71; found: C, 52.71; H, 2.77; N, 9.75%: UV-Vis spectrum
−1
−1
sh
(CH Cl ): l (ε, M cm ) 481 (31849), 370 (52966), 347 (60755), 264
2
2
max
1
−1
Synthesis of H L (1a): A mixture of 2-({2-aminophenyl}diazenyl)
(45783), 239 (64563); IR (KBr) (νmax/cm ): 1430 (N=N), 1615 (C=N),
3443 (O−Η), 977 (V=O).
2
phenol (2.13 g, 10 mmol) and 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (1.38g,
1
0 mmol) in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) was refluxed for 12 h. Reddish-
Catalytic oxygenation of thioethers
brown crystalline solid 1a was obtained on slow evaporation of the
solvent.
To
dichloromethane (10:90 v/v), the catalyst [(L )VO] (6.0 mg,
.015 mmol) and 50% H O (1 mL) were added at 0 °C. The mixture
a solution of PhSMe (465 mg, 3.75 mmol) in methanol–
1
3
-(2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl)phenyliminomethyl)benzene-1,2-
0
diol (1a): Isolated yield: 3.3 g (94%); Anal. calcd for C H N O (333):
C, 68.46; H, 4.54; N, 12.61; found: C, 68.48; H, 4.51; N, 12.68%; UV-
2
2
19
15
3
3
was stirred for 2.5 h keeping the temperature at 0–4 °C. The solution
was then dried in a vacuum. The products were isolated by thin layer
chromatography (TLC). The solid PhSOMe and PhSO Me were
−1
−1
sh
Vis spectrum (CH Cl ): l (ε, M cm ) 402 (5894), 312 (13420);
2
2
max
−
1
IR (KBr) (ν /cm ): 1466 (N=N), 1618.75 (CH=N), 3468.43 (OΗ);
2
max
1
isolated as the third and second fractions, respectively, with yields of
H NMR (DMSO-d ): δ 13.09 (s, OH), 11.54 (s, OH), 9.38(s, OH ),
6
187 mg and 222 mg, respectively. The products were characterised by
9
7
6
.05(s, CH=N), 7.99 (d, 1H), 7.87 (d, 1H), 7.72(t, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H),
.54–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.23 (d, 1H), 7.13 (d, 1H), 7.11 (t, 1H), 7.04 (d, 1H),
.87 (t, 1H).
-(2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl)-4-methyl-phenyliminomethyl)
IR spectroscopy. The results of the conversions of other thioethers to
sulfoxides and sulfones are given in Table 2.
3
Bromination of aromatic alcohols
2
benzene-1,2-diol H2L (1b) and 3-(2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl)-
4
Complex 2a (6 mg, 0.015 mmol) and p-cresol (198 mg, 1.8 mmol) were
3
-chloro-phenyliminomethyl)benzene-1,2-diol H L (1c): 1b and 1c
2
dissolved in CH CN (10 mL). To this mixture, KBr (440mg, 3.7 mmol)
3
were prepared following the same procedure as described for 1a, using
-({2-aminophenyl}diazenyl)-5-methylphenol and 2-({2-aminophenyl}
dissolved in water (2 mL) was added, followed by 30% H O (1 mL)
2
2
2
added dropwise with constant stirring. The pH of the solution was
adjusted to approximately 3 by dropwise addition of 2N HCl solution.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 20 h at room temperature. The
product was extracted with diethyl ether and concentrated to about
diazenyl)-5-chlorophenol in place of 2-({2-aminophenyl}diazenyl)phenol,
respectively.
(
1b): Isolated yield: 3.32 g (91%); Anal. calcd for C H N O (347.4):
20 17 3 3
C, 69.14; H, 4.94; N, 12.1; found: C, 69.02; H, 4.88; N, 12.18%; UV-
1
4
mL. Two products, 2-bromo-4-methylphenol and 2,6-dibromo-
-methylphenol, were separated by TLC and characterised by
−1
−1
sh
Vis spectrum (CH Cl ): l (ε, M cm ) 321 (15020), 400 (7876);
2
2
max
−
1
IR (KBr) (ν /cm ): 1466.99 (N=N), 1618.47 (C=N), 3475.40 (O−Η);
max
spectroscopic techniques. The isolated yields were 79 mg and 60 mg,
respectively. The results of the conversions are given in Table 3. The
same reaction was carried out keeping all other components and
conditions the same but not adding the catalyst.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d ): δ 12.87 (s, OH), 11.64 (s, OH), 9.26(s, OH ),
6
8
7
1
.90 (s, CH=N), 7.84 (d, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H), 7.55 (t, 1H), 7.51 (d, 1H),
.38 (t, 1H), 7.10 (d, 1H), 6.91 (d, 1H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 6.79 (d, 1H), 6.74 (t,
H), 2.43 (t, 3H).
1c): Isolated yield: 3.28 g (85%); Anal. calcd for C H N O Cl
(
Biological activity
19
14
3
3
(
367.8): C, 62.04; H, 3.84; N, 11.43; found: C, 61.96; H, 3.79; N,
Cell lines: Human breast cancer cells (MCF7 and MDA-MB-231) were
grown in DMEM medium, and HCT116 colon cancer cell cells were
grown as a monolayer in RPMI-1650 medium fortified with antibiotics
−1
−1
1
3
3
1.55%; UV-Vis spectrum (CH Cl ): l (ε, M cm ) 319 (10014),
2
2
max
sh
−1
92 (5911); IR (KBr) (ν /cm ): 1467.80 (N=N), 1618.82 (C=N),
max
1
474.99 (O−Η); H NMR (DMSO-d ): δ 13.20 (s, OH), 11.57 (s, OH),
−1
−1
6
(penicillin 100 μg mL , streptomycin sulfate (100 μg mL ) and 10%
9
.21 (s, OH ), 8.93 (s, CH=N), 7.86 (d, 2H), 7.71 (d, 1H), 7.58 (t, 1H),
foetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C, 5% CO atmosphere in humid
2
7
(
.56 (d, 1H), 7.40 (t, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 7.08 (d, 1H), 7.00 (d, 1H), 6.91
d, 1H), 6.72 (t, 1H).
Synthesis of [(L)VO]: The complexes [(L )VO] (2a), [(L )VO] (2b)
conditions (Table 4).
1
2
Determination of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50)
3
1
and [(L )VO] (2c) were prepared following similar procedures. A
representative procedure for 2a is given below.
The cytotoxic effect of [(L )VO] on MCF7, MDA-MB-231 and
HCT116 was evaluated by MTT (3-{4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl}-2,5-
4
4–47
[
(2-Hydroxy-6-(2-(2-oxido-4-alkyl-phenyl)diazenylphenylimino)
diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay.
Cells of the required cell
1
3
methylphenolate)oxidovanadium(IV)-N,N,O,O] [(L )VO] (2a):
drop of water was added to dissolve VOSO .5H O (0.125 g, 0.5 mmol)
A
line were seeded in a 96-well plate (5 × 10 cells/well) and allowed
to adhere for the next 24 h. The cells were then treated with different
4
2