SCHEME 1
Simple, Rapid Procedure for the Synthesis
of Chloromethyl Methyl Ether and Other
Chloro Alkyl Ethers1
Martin A. Berliner* and Katherine Belecki
Chemical Research and Development,
Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton Labs,
Groton, Connecticut 06340
Received June 29, 2005
oxymethylation strategies that circumvent the use of 1
by employing Lewis acid catalyzed exchange reactions
between methoxymethyl donors and alcohols,7 carboxylic
acids,8 and carboxamides.9 As part of a project to develop
a scalable synthesis of methoxymethylated intermediates
(4) for a medicinal chemistry program,10 we had occasion
to look closely at one of these methods.8 Our findings,
which led to the development of a rapid and convenient
protocol for the synthesis of R-halo ethers from symmetric
acetals, are described in this note.
The methoxymethylation protocol employed by our
Discovery colleagues to prepare malonate derivatives 4
was first reported by Gaudemar.8 This process involves
initial deprotonation of the starting malonate ester (2)
by ethyl 2-bromozinc acetate in dimethoxymethane (DMM)
to give an intermediate zinc enolate (3), which is then
treated with acetyl chloride to furnish the methoxym-
ethylated product (Scheme 1).
It was difficult to obtain consistent results using this
procedure, with yields of 4 ranging between 0 and 60%.
Our initial efforts to improve this reaction focused on
determining the role of zinc in this process, since there
is some discrepancy in the literature about the reaction
of acetals with acetyl chloride in the presence of Zn(II)
Zinc(II) salts catalyze the reaction between acetals and acid
halides to provide haloalkyl ethers in near-quantitative
yield. Reactions from millimole to mole scale are typically
complete in 1-4 h with 0.01 mol % catalyst. The solutions
of haloalkyl ethers thus obtained can be utilized directly in
reactions in which the presence of the ester byproduct does
not interfere. Excess haloalkyl ether is destroyed on workup,
thereby minimizing exposure to this class of carcinogenic
compounds.
Chloromethyl methyl ether (MOMCl, 1) and other
haloalkyl ethers are useful reagents for the introduction
of acid-sensitive protecting groups for alcohols, phenols,
thiols, and carboxylic acids,2 and they participate in a
wide variety of carbon-carbon bond forming reactions
as electrophiles and carbene precursors.3 MOMCl is the
most-utilized of this class of reagents, but because its
commercial preparation involves the reaction between
formaldehyde, methanol, and hydrogen chloride,4 1 is
typically contaminated with the highly carcinogenic bis-
(chloromethyl) ether. As a consequence, a number of
procedures have been devised for the synthesis of 1 that
do not result in the formation of bis(chloromethyl) ether.5
It is often only casually acknowledged that MOMCl is
hazardous, but current evidence indicates that it is also
carcinogenic.6 In addition, 1 is listed as an extremely
hazardous substance by the EPA and European Com-
munity, and is subject to extensive regulations governing
its distribution, handling, and use. These characteristics
have prompted the development of alternative meth-
(5) The majority of these processes rely on halide exchange between
an acid chloride and dimethoxymethane, and typically employ elevated
temperature and/or protic acid catalysis to accelerate the reaction. With
HCl: (a) Weinstock, L. M.; Karady, S.; Sletzinger, M. U.S. Patent
3,972,947; Chem. Abstr. 1976, 85, 142633. (b) Amato, J. S.; Karady,
S.; Sletzinger, M.; Weinstock, L. M. Synthesis 1979, 970. (c) Linderman,
R. J.; Jaber, M.; Griedel, B. D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6499. With
H2SO4: (d) Chong, J. M.; Shen, L. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 2801.
(e) Williams, A. G. WO 02/059070 A1; Chem. Abstr. 2002, 137, 124930.
(f) Reggelin, M.; Doerr, S. Synlett 2004, 1117. By other methods: (g)
Stadlwieser, J. Synthesis 1984, 490. (h) Jones, M. Synth. Commun.
1984, 14, 727.
(6) For a summary of toxicological data and safety recommendations,
see: (a) Sax’s Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 10th ed.;
Lewis, R. J., Sr., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2000; Vol. 2, p
854. (b) Sigma-Aldrich Library of Chemical Safety Data, 2nd ed.;
Lenga, R. E., Ed.; Sigma-Aldrich: Milwaukee, WI, 1988; Vol. 1, p 804.
The carcinogenicity of MOMCl has been estimated to be greater than
that of vinyl chloride; see Van Duuren, B. L. Environ. Res. 1989, 49,
143.
(7) From dimethoxymethane using protic and/or Lewis acids: (a)
Karimi, B.; Ma’mani, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6051. (b) Patney,
H. K. Synlett 1992, 567. (c) Fuji, K.; Nakano, S.; Fujita, E. Synthesis
1975, 276. (d) Olah, G. A.; Husain, A.; Narang, S. C. Synthesis 1983,
896. (e) Gras, J.-L.; Kong Win Chang, Y.-Y.; Guerin, A. Synthesis 1985,
74. (f) Kantam, M. L.; Santhi, P. L. Synlett 1993, 429. (g) Dieter, R.
K.; Datar, R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1990, 22, 63-70. Using other
reagents: (h) Marcune, B. F.; Karady, S.; Dolling, U.-H.; Novak, T. J.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2446-2449.
(8) Dardoize, F.; Gaudemar, M.; Goasdoue, N. Synthesis 1977, 567.
(9) Ledneczki, I.; Ago´cs, P. M.; Molna´r, A. Synlett 2003, 14, 2255.
(10) Reiter, L. R.; Freeman-Cook, K. D. WO 03/090752A1; Chem.
Abstr. 2003, 139, 364949.
(1) A preliminary version of this work was presented at the 2003
National Organic Symposium, Bloomington, IN.
(2) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999. (b) Wuts, P.
G. M. In Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L.
A., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1995.
(3) For a review, see: Benneche, T. Synthesis 1995, 1 and references
therein.
(4) For a representative lab-scale procedure, see: Marvel, C. S.;
Porter, P. K. Organic Syntheses; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1941;
Collect. Vol. I, p 377.
10.1021/jo051344g CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/13/2005
9618
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9618-9621