Paper
RSC Advances
formate production because the same yield of this product was
obtained at a lower temperature. Bearing in mind the easy
Acknowledgements
segregation of Ag–Pt alloy structure, the reaction at 423 K over National Science Centre in Poland (Grant No. UMO-2018/29/B/
.5Pt2Ag/M–Ar was performed for a longer time and the results ST5/00137) is acknowledged for the partial nancial support
0
are shown in Fig. 11A. Aer 3 hours of the reaction, a decrease in of this work.
both, methanol conversion and methyl formate selectivity were
noted. Especially signicant changes were in the selectivity to
methyl formate (decrease from 73% to 40%). The increase in the
References
reaction temperature considerably decreased the methyl formate
yield (Table 2). The same test of stability but at 523 K was per-
formed over Pt/Ag/S–Ar catalyst. As shown in Fig. 11B methanol
conversion did not change during the reaction time and reached
the value of ca. 100%. The selectivity to methyl formate was in the
range 63–75% and there were no signicant changes during the
reaction time. The UV-vis spectra of Pt/Ag/S–Ar aer stability test,
shown in Fig. S4-ESI† conrm the stability of the material and the
lack of changes in silver active species. Thus, the Pt/Ag/S catalyst
prepared within this work, containing silver doped with platinum
species, displays even better catalytic properties than the mate-
rials containing Pt & Ag alloy-like nanoparticles. On the one
hand, higher temperature of methanol oxidation on Pt/Ag/S–Ar is
required (523 K instead of 423 K) for sufficient methyl formate
selectivity but on the other hand, very good catalytic properties
are preserved for a longer time. What is more, in this study the
1 C. H. Bartholomew and R. J. Farrauto, Fundamentals of
Industrial Catalytic Processes, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edn,
2010, vol. 8, pp. 560–634.
2 J. M. Tatibouet, Appl. Catal., A, 1997, 148, 213–252.
3 G. Busca, Catal. Today, 1996, 27, 457–496.
4 B. N. Pattanaik, Int. J. Chem. Petrochem. Technol., 2013, 3, 55–
70.
5 J. S. Lee, J. C. Kim and Y. G. Kim, Appl. Catal., 1990, 57, 1–30.
6 J.-P. Lange, Catal. Today, 1980, 64, 3–8.
7 R. P. Aplin, Process for the production of methyl formate,
Eur. Pat., EP0189283A1, 1985.
8 J. G. Firth, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1970, 67, 212–215.
9 L. R. Merte, M. Ahmadi, F. Behafarid, L. K. Ono, E. Lira,
J. Matos, L. Li, J. C. Yang and B. R. Cuenya, ACS Catal.,
2013, 3, 1460–1468.
amount of platinum in catalyst was 10 times lower, which 10 M. P. Zum Mallen and L. D. Schmidt, J. Catal., 1996, 161,
signicantly reduced the cost of the material.
230–246.
11 H. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Zhu, A. Sapi, K. An, G. Kennedy,
W. D. Michalak and G. A. Somorjai, Nano Lett., 2013, 13,
4
. Conclusions
2
976–2979.
1
2 H. Wang, K. An, A. Sapi, F. Liu and G. A. Somorjai, Catal.
Lett., 2014, 144, 1930–1938.
3 W. Tu and Y. H. Chin, J. Catal., 2014, 313, 55–69.
4 J. Wisniewska and M. Ziolek, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 9534–9544.
5 J. Wisniewska, M. Ziolek, N. Artioli and M. Daturi, J. Catal.,
The results presented in this work not only allow construction
of effective bimetallic (Ag & Pt) catalyst for production of
methyl formate from methanol but also contributed to better
understanding of the role of each component in this bimetallic
catalyst in activity and selectivity in methanol oxidation.
1
1
1
2
016, 336, 58–74.
6 J. Czaplinska, P. Decyk and M. Ziolek, Appl. Catal., A, 2015,
04, 361–372.
7 J. Wisniewska, C. M. Yang and M. Ziolek, Catal. Today, 2019,
33, 89–96.
8 D. Zhao, J. Sun, Q. Li and G. D. Stucky, Chem. Mater., 2000,
2, 275–279.
9 J. Czaplinska, I. Sobczak and M. Ziolek, J. Phys. Chem. C,
014, 118, 12796–12810.
0
Metallic silver Ag was found to be responsible for chemi-
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
sorption of oxygen, while the platinum active phase took part
in activation of adsorbed oxygen, too. Platinum species also
acted as an electronic promoter and preserved total reduction
of silver oxide upon activation and reaction conditions. This
role was crucial because silver oxide was responsible for
selective formation of methyl formate (via chemisorption of
formaldehyde on Lewis acid sites). Thus, addition of small
5
3
1
2
amount of platinum (as the promoter) to silver catalyst resulted
in a higher resistance of cationic silver (Ag
0 J. Wisniewska, H. Guesmi, M. Ziolek and F. Tielens, J. Alloys
Compd., 2019, 770, 934–941.
1 T. Benk ´o , A. Beck, K. Frey, D. F. Srank ´o , O. Geszti, G. S ´a fr ´a n,
B. Mar ´o ti and Z. Schay, Appl. Catal., A, 2014, 479, 103–111.
2 D. Vargas and E. Guilleminot, Appl. Catal., B, 2017, 216, 1–
d+
n 2
, Ag O) to reduc-
tion and increased the activity and selectivity in oxidation of
methanol to methyl formate. Interaction between platinum
promoter and silver species ensured the best catalytic proper-
ties (activity, selectivity, stability) and such properties were
observed for the sample prepared by the step-by-step method
10.
3 L. Suber, I. Sondi, E. Matijevi ´c and D. V. Goia, J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 2005, 288, 489–495.
4 P. M. More, D. L. Nguyen, M. K. Dongare, S. B. Umbarkar,
N. Nuns, J. S. Girardon, C. Dujardin, C. Lancelot,
A. S. Mamede and P. Granger, Appl. Catal., B, 2015, 162,
(Pt/Ag/S). The catalyst obtained in this method displayed 74%
yield of methyl formate production at 523 K and it was stable in
the reaction time.
1
1–20.
Conflicts of interest
2
5 S. Miao, Y. Wang, D. Ma, Q. Zhu, S. Zhou, L. Su, D. Tan and
There are no conicts to declare.
X. Bao, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 17866–17871.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 14570–14580 | 14579