J. H. Clark et al.
Catalytic test: A typical catalytic test was performed as follows: Succinic
acid (1 mmol , SA, 0.124 mg, 6 wt% in solution), EtOH (30 mmol,
2.4 mL) and water (50 mmol , 0.9 mL) were added to a round-bottomed
flask with sulphonated Starbon (0.1 g), increasing the temperature to
808C. Samples were withdrawn periodically from the reaction mixture
and the mixture was left reacting (5 h). Products were analysed by GC
analysis by using an Agilent 6890N GC model equipped with a 7683B
series autosampler. Response factors of the reaction products (succinic
anhydride, monoethyl succinate and diethyl succinate) were determined
with respect to succinic acid from GC analysis by using known com-
pounds in calibration mixtures of specified compositions.
dramatically reduced after reuse. This can be explained by
the involvement of physisorbed H2SO4 in the catalytic per-
formance (Figure 6).
Conclusion
The outstanding Starbon acid performance in aqueous
esterification is believed to be a consequence of an ideal
combination of properties including hydrophobicity encour-
aging partitioning of the organic acid into the pores and pro-
duction of the more hydrophobic esters, mesoporosity en-
hancing molecular diffusion rates, surface functionality al-
lowing the formation of (two different types of) acid sites
and surface energy providing strong site activity. We can
foresee our approach being successfully extended to many
of the “top” bioplatform molecules, together with other
chemistries including the production of other small mole-
cules (amides, imides, acylated and alkylated products) pro-
viding enormous potential applications in the Biorefinery
chemical production units of the future.
Acknowledgements
We thank the EPSRC for support and colleagues in the Green Chemistry
Centre, especially Mr. P. Elliott for technical support, Mr. R. White for
providing the expanded starch as starting material and Mr. P. Shuttle-
worth for his help and interesting discussions. We would also like to
thank Ms M. Stark for her help with the SEM measurements. We also
thank a referee for suggestions.
[1] Feedstocks for the Future (Eds.: J. Bozell, M. Patel), ACS, New
York, 2006.
[2] A. J. Ragauskas, C. K. Williams, B. H. Davison, G. Britovsek, J. Cair-
ney, C. A. Eckert, W. J. Frederick, J. P. Hallet, D. J. Leak, C. L.
Liotta, J. R. Mielenz, R. Murphy, R. Templer, T. Tschaplinski, Sci-
ence 2006, 311, 484–489.
[3] J. H. Clark, Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 791–797.
[4] J. H. Clark, Green Chem. 2006, 8, 17–21.
[5] P. Anastas, J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry,Theory and Practice ,
Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.
[6] V. Budarin, J. H. Clark, J. J. E. Hardy, R. Luque, K. Milkowski, S. J.
Tavener, A. J. Wilson, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 4894–4897; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3782–3786.
[7] A. Koutinas, R.Wang and C Webb, Top Value chemicals from bio-
mass/pdfs/35523.pdf, unpublished results.
ExperimentalSection
Starbon synthesis: The method comprises three key stages: Firstly, corn
starch was gelatinised by heating in water for 48 h and subsequently
cooled to 58C for 1–2 d to yield a porous gel block. In the second stage,
the water in the block was exchanged with a solvent of lower surface ten-
sion, such as ethanol, and oven dried to yield a predominantly mesopo-
rous starch. In the final stage, the mesoporous starch was doped with a
catalytic amount of an organic acid (for example, 0.1 mmol of p-toluene-
sulfonic acid per 1 g of starch) and heated under vacuum at a tempera-
ture of 1808C for 6 h. Samples were heated to various temperatures (up
to 7508C) in 3.5 mL alumina sample caps in a NETZSCH STA analyser.
[8] a) J. Otera, Esterification, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2003;
b) J. Mulzer, Comprehensive Organic Synthesis (Eds.: B. M. Trost, L.
Fleming), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991.
[9] Y. Liu, E. Ranucci, M. S. Lindblad, A. C. Albertsson, J. Pol. Sci. Pol.
Chem. 2001, 39, 2508–2519.
Starbon sulphonation: As-synthesized materials were suspended in
H2SO4 of 99.999% purity (10 mL acid/g material, 4 h at 808C). After sul-
phonation, samples were subsequently washed with distilled water until
the washings were neutral, boiled in toluene (4 h) and water (3 h, 808C)
and finally oven dried (1008C) overnight before being tested in the cata-
lytic reaction. Elemental analysis gave a sulfur content of 1.9 (Starbon-
400-SO3H), 1.4 (Starbon-650-SO3H) and 1.3% (Starbon-750-SO3H).
[10] D. Shekhawat, K. Nagarajan, J. E. Jackson, D. J. Miller, Appl. Catal.
A 2002, 223, 261–273.
[12] a) B. R. Jermy, A. Pandurangan, Appl. Catal. A 2005, 288, 25–33;
b) B. Rabindram Jermy, A. Pandurangan, J. Mol. Catal. A 2005, 237,
146–154; c) F. Tataroglu Seyidov, Y. Mansoori, N. Goodarzi, J. Mol.
Catal. A 2005, 240, 186–190; d) Y. Mansoori, F. Seyidov Tataroglu,
M. Sadaghian, Green Chem. 2005, 7, 870–873; e) T. A. Peters, N. E.
Benes, A. Holmen, J. T. F. Keurentjes, Appl. Catal. A 2006, 297,
182–188; f) J. Lilja, J. Wärnå, T. Salmi, L. J. Petterson, J. Ahlkvist,
H. GrØnman, M. Rçnnholm, D. Y. Murzin, Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 115,
1–12; g) J. Lilja, J. Aumo, T. Salmi, D. Y. Murzin, P. Mäki-Arvela,
M. Sundell, K. Ekman, R. Peltonen, H. Vainio, Appl. Catal. A 2002,
228, 253–267; h) T. Okuhara, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3641–3665.
[13] C. R. Reddy, P. Iyengar, G. Nagendrappa, B. S. Jai Prakash, Catal.
Lett. 2005, 101, 87–91.
Characterisation: Starbons nitrogen adsorption measurements were car-
ried out at 77 K by using an ASAP 2010 volumetric adsorption analyser
from Micromeritics. Before measurement, the samples were under
vacuum (3–4 h at the temperature equal to temperature of sample prepa-
ration).
Thermogravimetric analysis coupled with IR (TGIR) was used to deter-
mine the loading of SO3H groups and was performed by using a Netzsch
STA 409 (at scan rates of 108C minÀ1, with typically 20 mg sample under
flowing N2 at 100 mLminÀ1), coupled with a Brüker EQUINOX-55 in-
strument equipped with a liquid N2 cooled MCT detector.
Scanning electron Micrographs (SEM) were recorded in a JEOL JSM-
6490 LV. Samples were Au/Pd coated on
a high resolution sputter
SC7640 at a sputtering rate of 1500 V per minute, up to 7 nm thickness.
Diffuse reflectance IR Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectra were recorded
on a Brüker EQUINOX-55 instrument equipped with a liquid N2 cooled
MCT detector. Resolution was 2 cmÀ1 and 1024 scans were averaged to
obtain the spectra in the 4000–600 cmÀ1 range. Spectra were recorded by
using KBr as a reference. The samples for DRIFTS studies were pre-
pared by mechanically grinding all reactants to a fine powder (sample/
KBr 1:1000 ratio).
[14] a) H. J. Bart, J. Reidetschläger, K. Schatka, A. Lehmann, Int. J.
Chem. Kinet. 1994, 26, 1013–1021; b) C. R. Reddy, P. Iyengar, G.
Nagendrappa, B. S. Jai Prakash, J. Mol. Catal. A 2005, 229, 31–37.
[15] T. Higuchi, L. Eberson, J. D. McRae, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
3001–3004.
[16] a) Y. Liu, E. Lotero, J. G. Goodwin, Jr., J. Mol. Catal. A 2006, 245,
132–140; b) R. Aafaqi, A. R. Mohamed, S. Bhatia, J. Chem. Tech-
6918
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6914 – 6919