S. Beheshti et al.
InorganicChemistryCommunications94(2018)80–84
[Zn2(NH2-BDC)2(4-bpdh)]·3DMF (TMU-16-NH2) is a two-fold in-
Table 2
The reaction in the presence of TMU-16 and TMU-16-NH2.
terpenetrated pillared-layer microporous Zn-MOF [38, 39]. TMU-16-
NH2 is composed of paddle-wheel dinuclear zinc carboxylate units
Zn2(COO)4, which are bridged by the NH2-BDC ligands to form a dis-
torted 2D square grid. The 2D square grids are pillared by 4-bpdh
molecules to form a 3D framework with a topology that can be de-
scribed as a primitive cubic lattice (RCSR symbol pcu) [38, 39]. Two of
the 3D frameworks interpenetrate in TMU-16-NH2, reducing the pore
size resulted in a 1D channel in the direction of the rectangular diagonal
of the paddle-wheel clusters with a cross section of approximately
3.1 × 3.2 Å in cross section (including van der Waals radii) (Fig. 1a)
[38]. Furthermore to investigate the influence of amine group on the
catalytic activity, the pores in the MOF became free of reactive groups
(-NH2) without changing the SBU or the underlying framework to-
pology. The non-functionalized isoreticular framework, [Zn2(BDC)2(4-
bpdh)]·3DMF (TMU-16) was used as another heterogeneous catalyst
(Fig. 1b). TMU-16 and TMU-16-NH2 are isostructural and crystallize in
the monoclinic space group C2/c [38]. The phase purity of the bulk
materials were independently confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction
(PXRD). The powder X-ray diffraction data show that the two com-
pounds are isotypic to each other (Fig. 2). The comparison of the cal-
culated free volume of the compounds by PLATON shows that it varies
in decrements from 3648.4 Å3 per unit cell (42.7% of the cell volume)
in TMU-16 to 2286.1 Å3 (27.6%) in TMU-16-NH2 [40].
TGA data indicate that TMU-16-NH2 and TMU-16 release their guest
molecules over the temperature ranges 25–230 and 25–280 °C to form
the guest-free phases, [Zn2(NH2-BDC)2(4-bpdh)] and [Zn2(BDC)2(4-
bpdh)], respectively (Fig. S1 in the SI). Weight losses of about 23%
were measured for both MOFs, which are attributed to the loss of 3DMF
(calc.: ~24%). The networks TMU-16-NH2 and TMU-16 are thermally
stable up to 320 and 360 °C, respectively, as evidenced by the fact that
no additional weight loss was observed at those temperatures, after
which the frameworks eventually decompose.
To characterize the possible catalytic behavior of TMU-16-NH2,
three component reaction of 1,3-dimethylbarbituric acid, benzaldehyde
and malononitrile, in the presence of TMU-16-NH2 in different solvents
was performed. It can be deduced from these results that higher yields
were achieved in polar protic solvents, whereas the reaction occurred
with difficulty in solvents with lower polarity (Table 1). Methanol and
ethanol are more polar than acetonitrile. As a result, the reaction effi-
ciency is higher in these solvents. However, the reactions under solvent-
free condition were slow. It should be pointed out that in the absence of
catalyst, the reaction was slow and even after prolonged reaction time,
considerable amounts of starting materials remained unreacted. Cata-
lytic activity of TMU-16-NH2 is as a result of -NH2 and azine groups in
its structure. The results of applying TMU-16 in three component re-
action of 1,3-dimethylbarbituric acid, benzaldehyde and malononitrile
approved this and indicate that the catalytic activity decreased in the
absence of -NH2 group (Table 2). TMU-16-NH2 unlike IRMOF-3, is
Entry
Catalyst
Yield (%)
1
2
3
TMU-16
TMU-16-NH2
–
40
98
0
Table 3
The reaction in the presence of TMU-16 and TMU-16-NH2.
Entry
Ar
Yield (%)
M.p. (°C)
Found
Reported
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
C6H5
98
84
86
100
90
216–218
221–223
231–233
214–216
198–200
202–204
204–206
219–220
225–226
235
217–219
200
4-MeO-C6H4
4-Br-C6H4
4-NO2-C6H4
4-Cl-C6H4
2-NO2-C6H4
3-NO2-C6H4
100
100
206
204–206
stable in water (Fig. 2a) and the reaction in the presence of TMU-16-
NH2 that was carried out in water, proceeded to 96% yield after 1 h. To
examine the general application of the catalyst (TMU-16-NH2), we ex-
tended the scope of the reaction to the synthesis of various Pyrano[2,3-
d]pyrimidines under the above-mentioned optimized conditions
(Table 3). These reactions proceeded smoothly and no undesirable side
reactions were observed. Both electron donating and withdrawing
groups on the phenyl ring were well tolerated affording the expected
products in good yields. Substrates with electron withdrawing sub-
stituents are more reactive in the reaction, because they are more re-
active toward nucleophilic attack. As a result, yield of the reaction in
the presence of them is higher. In addition, TMU-16-NH2 could be re-
used at least 5 runs without any loss in its activity (Fig. 3). So that
powder PXRD (Fig. 2) the FT-IR data (Fig. 4) data showed no changes in
its structure. Thus the integrity of the framework is confirmed.
In summary, two MOFs, Zn(NH2-BDC)(4-bpdh)]·2DMF (TMU-16-
Table 1
The one-pot three component reaction of benzaldehyde, malononitrile and 1,3-
dimethylbarbituric acid in different solvents.
Entry
Solvent
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
EtOH
MeOH
H2O
n-Hexane
CH3CN
Toluene
–
96
85
98
4
42
16
10
Fig. 3. Recyclability of TMU-16-NH2 in the reaction.
82