SCHEME 1
A New Bis(2,2,2-tr iflu or oeth yl)p h osp h on a te
for th e Syn th esis of Z-Un sa tu r a ted
N-Meth oxy-N-m eth yla m id es
Samuel Fortin, Fe´lix Dupont, and
Pierre Deslongchamps*
De´partement de chimie, Institut de pharmacologie,
Universite´ de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Avenue Nord,
Sherbrooke, Que´bec J 1H 5N4, Canada
SCHEME 2
pierre.deslongchamps@courrier.usherb.ca
Received April 12, 2002
Ab st r a ct : The N-methoxy-N-methyl bis(2,2,2-trifluoro-
ethyl)phosphonamide was easily obtained via the Arbuzov
reaction with use of commercially available tris(2,2,2-tri-
fluoroethyl)phosphite, 2-bromo-N-methoxy-N-methylaceta-
mide, and KF/alumina. The reaction of bis(2,2,2-trifluoro-
ethyl)phosphonate with several aldehydes demonstrates the
versatility of the method, which gives Z-unsaturated amides
in good yields.
the N,N′-dimethoxy-N,N′-dimethylurea6 (3) was used as
the electrophile (Scheme 1).
We decided to investigate the classical method for the
synthesis of phosphonates, i.e, the Arbuzov reaction,7 that
involve trialkyl phosphite as the nucleophile and a
R-halocarbonyl compound as the electrophile. The ex-
perimental procedure is very simple, the two reagents
are mixed together without solvent and then the desired
phosphonate is distilled. 2-Bromo-N-methoxy-N-methy-
lacetamide (4) was easily obtained8 and the tris(2,2,2-
trifluoroethyl)phosphite is commercially available. How-
ever, the desired phosphonate was never detected in
standard conditions and degradation of the tris(2,2,2-
trifluoroethyl)phosphite occurred when the temperature
reached 200 °C. Also the use of 2-iodo-N-methoxy-N-
methylacetamide (5) (formed by the reaction of sodium
iodide and 4 in acetone under reflux) did not change the
outcome of the reaction (Scheme 2).
Tius and Busch-Petersen used KF/alumina to form
R-heterosubstituted Weinreb amides.9 We found that
(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) phosphite reacts with bromides 4
and 6 in the presence of KF/alumina in acetonitrile to
give the desired phosphonates 7 and 8 in moderate yield
(33%). This method was also applied to commercially
available ethyl 2-bromopropionate (9) for the synthesis
of phosphonate 10 developed by Still2 (Scheme 3).
In search for another phosphonate, giving access to
highly functionalized trisubstituted alkenes, we decided
to investigate the reactivity of R-bromophosphonates.
Starting with phosphonate 7, bromophosphonate 11 was
easily synthesized (Scheme 4) under modified Balczewski
conditions.10
One of the best methods for the synthesis of conjugated
unsaturated esters or nitriles is the Wittig-Horner-
Emmons reaction.1 The Wittig-Horner-Emmons olefi-
nation gives preferentially the E-alkene, but a combina-
tion of modifications on the structure of the phosphonate
(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl instead of ethyl), associated with a
highly dissociated countercation with a crown ether, gives
the Z-alkene in high yield.2 On the other hand, N-
methoxy-N-methylamide is a useful synthetic precursor
for aldehydes and ketones.3 We wish to report a new class
of bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)phosphonate containing the
N-methoxy-N-methylamide moiety, which gives access to
Z-unsaturated aldehydes or ketones in high yield.
The method reported by Still2 to make the bis(2,2,2-
trifluoroethyl)phosphonate, i.e, reaction of the corre-
sponding triethylphosphonoacetate with PCl5 to form the
dichlorophosphonate followed by treatment with 2,2,2-
trifluoroethanol and a base, does not work with N-
methoxy-N-methylamide. Indeed, when phosphonate 1
Bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)phosphonates 7, 8, and 11 were
used to form several Z-unsaturated N-methoxy-N-me-
thylamides as indicated in Table 1. Only the Z isomer is
detectable by H NMR for all entries, except for the case
of bromoamide 17, where the E isomer is the major
is treated with phosphorus pentachloride, complete deg-
radation occurred. Another method for the synthesis of
bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)phosphonate developed by Savig-
nac,4 and which was utilized by J in,5 also failed when
1
product (ratio 7:1). The two isomers are easily separable
(1) Wardworth, W. S. Organic Reactions; J . R. Wiley and Sons: New
York, 1977; Vol. 25, pp 73-253.
(6) Whipple, W. L.; Reich, H. J . J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2911-2912.
(7) Bhattacharya, A. K.; Thyagarajan, G. Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 415-
430.
(2) Still, W. C.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405-4408.
(3) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 22, 3815-
3818.
(8) Mechelke, M. F.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4339-
(4) Patois, C.; Savignac, P.; About-J audet, E.; Collignon, N. Synthetic
Commun. 1991, 21, 2391-2396.
(5) Yu, W.; Su, M.; J in, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6725-6728.
4342.
(9) Tius, M. A.; Busch-Petersen, J . Synlett 1997, 531-533.
(10) Balczewski, P. Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 2199-2212.
10.1021/jo025816s CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/21/2002
J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5437-5439
5437