F. Yang et al. / Journal of Catalysis 349 (2017) 84–97
85
oxide) forms a bimetallic catalyst, such as Ni–Co [16], Pt–Mo [17],
Pt–Co [18], Pt–Zn [19], Pd–Fe [20], or Ni–Fe [21]. These bimetallic
catalysts are expected to balance the activity and selectivity of
deoxygenation and hydrogenation, and have been explored for
HDO of phenolics. For example, Nie and Resasco reported that
the Ni–Fe catalyst is selective for deoxygenation of m-cresol to
toluene, and proposed that Fe helped the hydrogenation of the tau-
tomerization intermediate from m-cresol to 3-methyl-3,5-
cyclohexadienol, which is then quickly dehydrated to toluene
[21]. It is noted that the Ni–Fe catalyst is less active than the Ni cat-
alyst. Sun et al. reported deoxygenation of guaiacol and m-cresol to
aromatics over a Pd–Fe catalyst and suggested that Fe is the active
site for direct deoxygenation, whereas Pd is the active site for acti-
vating hydrogen [20,22]. The addition of 5% Pd improves the activ-
ity of Fe2O3 by a factor of 2 [22]. Clearly, more active and selective
catalysts for conversion of phenolics to aromatics are desirable.
Although catalysts based on bimetallics show promise in improv-
ing the selectivity, the nature of the active site and the mechanism
for selective deoxygenation are not yet clear.
ment, a catalyst sample of 40 mg was loaded in a U-tube quartz
reactor and pretreated with flowing N2 at 300 °C for 1 h. After
the sample was cooled to room temperature, the gas was shifted
to 5% H2/Ar (25 mL/min). After the signal was stabilized, the sam-
ple was heated linearly to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The
amount of hydrogen uptake was monitored on line by a thermal
conductive detector.
The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were
obtained on a JEM 2010F field emission system operated at
200 kV. The fine catalyst powder was dispersed ultrasonically in
ethanol for 30 min and a drop of the suspension was deposited
on a carbon-coated copper grid for TEM measurement.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a
PHI 1600 ESCA spectrometer equipped with an AlK
a X-ray radia-
tion source (h = 1486.6 eV). Catalyst samples were prereduced at
v
450 °C for 1 h ex situ before each measurement. The binding
energy (BE) values were referenced to the C1s peak at 284.5 eV.
Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) of CO adsorption were
recorded on a Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Scientific), equipped with a
In this work, we report a highly active bimetallic Ni–Re/SiO2
catalyst for selective deoxygenation of m-cresol to toluene that
greatly inhibits CAC hydrogenolysis under mild conditions. m-
Cresol was used as a model compound because it is an important
intermediate product from HDO of complex phenolic compounds,
such as guaiacol [23,24]. The inert silica was used to avoid compli-
cations due to the support, and therefore, to allow us to focus on
better understanding the role of the bimetallic catalysts. Using a
combination of detailed characterizations and density functional
theoretical calculation, the active site for deoxygenation is deter-
mined to be the Ni–Re neighboring sites.
liquid-N2-cooled mercury–cadmium–tellurium detector and a
transmittance cell. The catalyst wafer (20 mg) was reduced
in situ at 450 °C for 1 h with flowing H2 at 30 mL/min. After that,
the sample was cooled to room temperature in flowing He at
30 mL/min and then the background was recorded. The sample
was exposed to 5% CO/He (30 mL/min) for 30 min, followed by
He purging for another 30 min. The spectra were recorded at a res-
olution of 4 cmꢁ1 and 128 scans.
The dispersion of Ni was estimated based on dynamic CO
chemisorption, measured in a microreactor system equipped with
a Cirrus 200 mass spectrometer (MKS). The system consisted of an
oven with a temperature controller, gas delivery system, micro
quartz reactor (6 mm o.d.), and six-port valve. Catalyst samples
(50 mg, 40–60 mesh) were reduced at 450 °C for 1 h in flowing
H2, followed by He purging (30 mL/min) for another 30 min. Then
the temperature was decreased to room temperature. Pulses of 5%
CO/He (100 mL) were sent to the catalyst through the six-port valve
until a constant CO peak area was reached.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
The bimetallic Ni–Re catalysts were prepared using incipient
wetness co-impregnation of SiO2 (Sigma, SBET = 200 m2/g) with
aqueous solutions of calculated amounts of Ni(NO3)2ꢀ6H2O (Strem
Chemicals) and NH4ReO4 (Alfa). After impregnation for 12 h, the
samples were dried overnight at 120 °C, followed by calcination
at 400 °C for 4 h with a heating rate of 2 °C/min. The amount of
Ni loading was 5 wt.%, while Re loading was varied from 0 to
10 wt.%. The catalyst was denoted as 5NiXRe, where 5 and X repre-
sent the weight percentages of Ni and Re, respectively, in the sam-
ple. The catalyst powder was pressed, crushed, and sieved to 40–60
mesh for reaction.
NH3 and isopropylamine temperature–programmed desorption
(NH3 TPD and IPA TPD) were measured on the same system as CO
chemisorption. A catalyst sample of 100 mg was reduced at 450 °C
for 1 h and then purged with flowing He (30 mL/min) for another
30 min. The temperature was reduced to 100 °C. For NH3 TPD,
the sample was exposed to a stream of 2% NH3/He (30 mL/min)
for 30 min. For IPA TPD, liquid IPA (5 lL/pulse, 10 pulse, 3 min/
pulse) was injected using a microsyringe manually and vaporized
before entering the reactor. After the sample was flushed with
flowing He (30 mL/min) for 30 min, the temperature was increased
to 650 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The quantification was done by
injecting pulses of 2% NH3/He (10 mL/pulse).
2.2. Catalyst characterization
Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy
(DRIFTS) of pyridine adsorption were measured using a Frontier
spectrometer (PerkinElmer), equipped with a diffuse reflectance
accessory and a reaction chamber (Harrick). A fine powder catalyst
was loaded into the sample cup of the chamber. After the sample
was reduced at 450 °C for 1 h and purged with He for 30 min, it
was cooled to 100 °C, at which a background spectrum was
recorded. Pyridine vapor was then introduced for 30 min, followed
by purging using He for another 30 min. The DRIFT spectra were
recorded at a resolution of 4 cmꢁ1 with 64 scans.
Nitrogen adsorption was recorded at liquid nitrogen tempera-
ture in an automatic Micrometrics Digisorb 2600 analyzer. The cat-
alysts were outgassed at 350 °C prior to measurements. The
specific surface area of the catalysts was calculated using the Bru
nauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method in the relative pressure range
0.005 < p/p0 < 0.27.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the catalyst samples were
recorded on a Rigaku D/max 2500 diffractometer with a Cu K
a
radiation source (k = 1.54056 A) in the 2h range 20°–80°.
The Raman spectra were obtained on a Renishaw Raman spec-
trometer, with an Ar+ ion laser (532 nm) being the exciting light
2.3. Density functional theory calculations of phenol adsorption
source. The focusing spot size was about 1
collected at room temperature, with an acquisition time of 10 s/
scan and a resolution of 2 cmꢁ1
Hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2 TPR) was
performed on a Chemisorb 2750 (Micrometrics). Prior to measure-
lm. All spectra were
Density functional theory (DFT) periodic slab calculations were
carried out using the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP)
[25–27]. The periodic DFT code uses the projector-augmented
wave (PAW) method to describe the effective core potentials and
.