Green Chemistry
Communication
oxidation of ∼2 lbs (1 kg) of p-toluidine (entry 2) and obtained
a 92% yield of p-nitro-toluene and with a >99% recovery of the
Conclusion
catalyst. The course of the amine oxidations proceeds via both As “green” oxidation methods gain popularity for commercial
the hydroxylamino and nitroso intermediates which could be production, the need for homogeneous, but easily recovered,
easily detected by thin-layer chromatography. Therefore, slow catalysts becomes paramount. Our current work demonstrates
addition of the amine to the homogeneous H2O2/CaWO4 the value of using CaWO4 as the catalyst of choice for large
mixture was important in suppressing the formation of azo- scale, batch mode oxidations. It is sufficiently broad in scope
and/or azoxy by-products which often accompany these oxi- to oxidize various classes of organic substrates. This material
dations. By carefully monitoring the reaction progress, we is readily available, inexpensive and provides technical simpli-
could consistently obtain high yields of the desired nitro city for recovery thus minimizing waste stream generation and
compounds.
handling. We are presently using this catalytic system for
In the case of alkene oxidations13 (entries 4 & 5), methanol oxidizing multi-pound quantities of heterocyclic amines
or t-butanol was employed as a cosolvent to facilitate solubili- toward commercial production of heterocyclic nitro analogues.
zation of the substrate. The epoxidation of norbornene (entry
5) gave >99% of the expected exo-epoxide, as was determined
by H & 13C spectra.14 Additionally, we did not observe the for-
1
Acknowledgements
mation of norborneol, or norbornanone which has been
observed with other hydrogen peroxide/catalyst systems.10c,15
This work was supported by an Innovation Award Grant spon-
As previously mentioned, temperature plays a significant sored by Indiana University of Pennsylvania and a supporting
role in determining the final yield of product due to the com- grant provided by Aerojet Corporation.
peting nonproductive decomposition of H2O2 by this catalyst.
This is particularly important for substrates, such as alcohols,
that are oxidized slowly by hydrogen peroxide systems. Alcohol
oxidations were conducted between 65–70 °C to avoid increas-
Notes and references
ing the rate of nonproductive decomposition of hydrogen per-
oxide which occurs at higher temperatures. However, it is
possible to employ reaction temperatures as high as 85–90 °C
by adding stabilizing agents such as 9,10-phen-anthroline. The
stabilizing 9,10-phenanthroline, being water insoluble at room
temperature, was recovered along with the catalyst. We did not
observe any change in the recovered CaWO4 when used in
combination with this stabilizer. We used this combination
for the oxidation of cyclohexanol due to the sluggish rate of
conversion to cyclohexanone when compared with other types
of substrates.
1 (a) J.-E. Backväll, Modern Oxidation Methods, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2004; (b) R. A. Sheldon and J. K. Kochi, Metal
Catalyzed Oxidiation of Organic Compounds, Academic
Press, New York, 1981; (c) R. A. Sheldon, M. Wallau,
I. W. C. E. Arends and U. Schuchardt, Acc. Chem. Res., 1988,
31, 485.
2 D. H. Koo, M. Kim and S. Chang, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 5015.
3 C. Venturello and R. D’Aloisio, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53,
1553.
4 Y. M. A. Yamada, M. Ichinohe, H. Takahashi and
S. Ikegami, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 1837.
The oxidation of 3-pentanol (entry 7) proceeded as expected
to afford 3-pentanone in good yield. The oxidation of geraniol
(entry 8) gave mostly the 2,3-epoxide in 78% yield, but was
complicated by approximately 20% hydrolysis of the epoxide to
afford the corresponding 1,2,3-triol.16 Notwithstanding, oxi-
dation of the allylic alcohol double bound occurred preferen-
tially with the formation of only trace amounts of the 2,3/
6,7-bis-epoxide.
5 (a) B. Karimi, M. Ghoreishi-nexhand and J. H. Clark, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 625; (b) K. Yamagukchi, C. Yoshida,
S. Uchida and N. Mizuno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 530.
6 J. Wei, X. Shi, D. He and M. Zhang, Chin. Sci. Bull., 2002,
47, 2060.
7 (a) L. Barrio, J. M. Campos-Martin and J. L. G. Fierro,
J. Phys. Chem., 2007, 111, 2166; (b) F. W. B. Einstein and
B. R. Penfold, Acta Crystallogr., 1964, 17, 1127.
The oxidation of sulfides (entries 9 & 10) with 2.0 equiva-
lents of 30% H2O2 at 25 °C for 0.5 h gave, as expected, high
yields of the corresponding sulfones. Interestingly, the use of
only 1.0 equiv. of 30% H2O2 did not give high yields of sulfox-
ides.16 Under these conditions, we obtained ∼45–50% yields of
sulfones and only small amounts (<5%) of sulfoxides, the
remaining being unreacted sulfide. Attempts to suppress the
over-oxidation to obtain only sulfoxide by employing slow
addition of peroxide, reducing the amount of catalyst, or decreas-
ing the temperature to 0 °C, were not successful. The reasons for
these results remain unclear and may have implications regard-
ing the nature of the peroxotungstate species in solution. We are
examining this particular reaction in more detail.
8 (a) M. H. Alizadeh and R. Tayebee, J. Braz. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 16, 108; (b) S. Sakaue, Y. Sakata, Y. Nishiyama and
Y. Ishii, Chem. Lett., 1992, 289; (c) D. Sloboda-Rozner,
P. Witte, P. L. Alsters and R. Newmann, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2004, 346, 339; (d) S. Sakaue, T. Takashi, Y. Nishiyama and
Y. Ishii, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 3633.
9 (a) K. Sato, M. Aoki, J. Takagi and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1997, 119, 12386; (b) K. Sato, M. Aoki, M. Ogawa,
T. Hashimoto and R. Noyori, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 8310;
(c) K. Mori, T. Kara, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani and K. Kaneda,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 10657; (d) C. Venturello and
M. Gambaro, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 5924;
(e) S. Abramovici, R. Neumann and Y. Sasson, J. Mol. Catal.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Green Chem.