Letter
NJC
aliphatic chains, whilst the aromatic units reinforced the p–p
In summary in this paper we report the design and synthesis
interactions in the compounds resulting in successful gelation. of a new amphiphilic scaffold containing 12-HSA at the
Thus on the basis of FT-IR, PXRD and computational data, we N-terminus, that possesses the capability to entrap hazardous
concluded that the compounds pack in b-sheet like structures.
hydrogen halides namely HCl/HBr and form hydrogels in the
To gain insight into the morphological aspect of the form of vapors or liquids. This selective anion encapsulation
xerogels, field emission scanning electron microscopic studies procedure represents an alternate route for the effective
were performed using xerogels of the same concentration. removal of these harmful chemicals from industrial effluents,
Importantly, the images of all the compounds demonstrated thus providing a safe and easy protocol for green management.
an entangled three dimensional fibrillar network of dimen- We attribute this phenomenon to be a major contribution from
sions 20–50 nm in width and several micrometers in length, a the hydroxy substituent of the amphiphile. From the synthesis
characteristic of b-sheet structures.13 Additionally, we noted perspective it involved a single step reaction and therefore is
that in compound II & III, the fibrils were more closely packed cost effective. We envision that the resultant halo-entrapped
than that in I & IV which might be reflected in their mechanical hydrogels may exhibit potential applicabilities in the develop-
strength (Fig. 5).
ment of novel materials in versatile avenues.
In continuation with the previous studies, to gain deeper
insights into the mechanical integrity of the compounds, we
performed rheological measurements, as it is one of the prime
requirements for any hydrogel to be used as a biomaterial.
In this experiment, the elastic response (G0) and viscous
response (G00) were measured as a function of strain.14 As observed
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
from Fig. S10 (ESI†), throughout the viscoelastic region, the Acknowledgements
storage modulus (G0) was higher than the loss modulus (G00) in
the region 1 to 100 rad sꢀ1 (angular frequency) until the applica-
tion of strain of approximately 5% for compound I & IV and 40%
for compound II & III. This behavior demonstrated a soft gel
phase formation (Fig. S10, ESI†).13 At this corresponding limit of
maximum strain, a cross over point was noticed where the value
of loss modulus (G00) slightly exceeded the value of the storage
modulus (G0) and transformed into a solution. Increasing the
strain beyond this point, resulted in the decrease of both the
modulus since intermolecular forces had won over the applied
strain and the fibrils were unable to withstand large deforma-
tions. Thus from the rheological studies we noted the strain
bearing ability of compounds II & III to be higher than that of
I & IV, data previously supported by the morphological observation.
AS and PT thank MPCST/CSIR for research fellowships. ADK
acknowledges UGC (F.4-(55)/2014(BSR)/FRP), New Delhi, for financial
support. All the authors are grateful to Dr Sanjit Konar, IISER Bhopal
for his valuable advice.
Notes and references
1 L. A. J. Rutgeerts, A. H. Soultan, R. Subramani, B. Toprakhisar,
H. Ramon, M. C. Paderes, W. M. De Borggraeve and J. Patterson,
Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 7323–7326; M. D. Segarra-Maset,
V. J. Nebot, J. F. Miravet and B. Escuder, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2013, 42, 7086–7098; L. Schnaider, S. Brahmachari, N. W.
Schmidt, B. Mensa, S. Shaham-Niv, D. Bychenko, L. Adler-
Abramovich, L. J. W. Shimon, S. Kolusheva, W. F. DeGrado
and E. Gazit, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 1365; N. Habibi, N. Kamaly,
A. Memic and H. Shafiee, Nano Today, 2016, 11, 41–60;
A. M. Garcia, M. Kurbasic, S. Kralj, M. Melchionna and
S. Marchesan, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 8110–8113; H. A. Pal,
S. Mohapatra, V. Gupta, S. Ghosh and S. Verma, Chem. Sci.,
2017, 8, 6171.
2 M. D. Segarra-Maset, V. J. Nebot, J. F. Miravet and
B. Escuder, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 7086–7098.
¨
3 A. M. Jonker, D. W. P. M. Lowik and J. C. M. van Hest, Chem.
Mater., 2012, 24, 759–773.
4 A. Dasgupta, J. Hassan Mondal and D. Das, RSC Adv., 2013,
3, 9117–9149.
5 D. M. Stavert, D. C. Archuleta, M. J. Behr and B. E. Lehnert,
Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 1991, 16, 636–655.
6 J. H. Liao, C. T. Chen and J. M. Fang, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 561;
J. W. Weed, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 506–519; H. Maeda,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2008, 14, 11274–11282; S. Basak, J. Nanda
and A. Banerjee, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2356–2359;
T. Becker, C. Y. Goh, F. Jones, M. J. McIldowie, M. Mocerino
and M. I. Ogden, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3900–3902; H. Cui,
Fig. 5 FE-SEM images of the xerogels of compound I–IV showing the
formation of the self-assembled fibrillar network. The gels were prepared
in methanol water mixture in the presence of concentrated hydrochloric
acid.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2020
New J. Chem., 2020, 44, 3828--3832 | 3831