Germacrone derivatives as new insecticidal and acaricidal compounds: A structure-activity relationship

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules24162898

Currently, the use of synthetic pesticides is the main method of plant protection applied in agri- and horticulture. However, its excessive use leads to the development of pesticide resistance, a contamination of the environment, toxicity to non-target organisms, and risks for human health. With the ultimate aim of contributing to the develop of a more sustainable pest management, we used the natural product germacrone (compound 1), reported to possess significant insecticidal activity, as starting material for the generation of molecular diversity (2-24). Some of the generated derivatives are natural compounds, such as 1,10-epoxygermacrone (2), 4,5-epoxygermacrone (3), gajutsulactone A (7), germacrol (11), isogermacrone (14), 9-hydroxyeudesma-3,7(11)dien-6-one (19), eudesma-4,7(11),dien-8-one (20), eudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (21) and eudesma-4(15),7(11)-dien-8-one (22). Compounds, 7,11-9,10-diepoxigermacr-4,5-en-8-ol (17), 7,11-epoxieudesma-4,7(11)-dien-8-one (23) and 7,11-epoxieudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (24) are described for the first time. The biocidal activity of most of these compounds was assayed against the tick Hyalomma lusitanicum. The acaricidal effects of compound 24 were four times higher than that of germacrone (1). Compound 2 is an insect antifeedant a thousand times more potent than germacrone against Rhopalosiphum padi, which makes this substance a promising selective antifeedant against this cereal pest.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules24162898

molecules
Article
Germacrone Derivatives as new Insecticidal
and Acaricidal Compounds: A
Structure-Activity Relationship
Alberto Galisteo Pretel 1, Helena Pérez del Pulgar 1, Estela Guerrero de León 2,
José Luis López-Pérez 2,3 , A. Sonia Olmeda 4, Azucena Gonzalez-Coloma 5
,
Alejandro F. Barrero 1,* and José Francisco Quílez del Moral 1,
*
1
Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama 07156, Panama
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, IBSAL-CIETUS, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Faculty of Veterinary, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain
2
3
4
5
*
Correspondence: afbarre@ugr.es (A.F.B.); jfquilez@ugr.es (J.F.Q.d.M.)
ꢀꢁꢂꢀꢃꢄꢅꢆꢇ
Academic Editors: David Díez and María Ángeles Castro
Received: 2 July 2019; Accepted: 2 August 2019; Published: 9 August 2019
ꢀꢁꢂꢃꢄꢅꢆ
Abstract: Currently, the use of synthetic pesticides is the main method of plant protection applied in
agri- and horticulture. However, its excessive use leads to the development of pesticide resistance,
a contamination of the environment, toxicity to non-target organisms, and risks for human health.
With the ultimate aim of contributing to the develop of a more sustainable pest management, we
used the natural product germacrone (compound 1), reported to possess significant insecticidal
activity, as starting material for the generation of molecular diversity (
derivatives are natural compounds, such as 1,10-epoxygermacrone (
gajutsulactone A ( ), germacrol (11), isogermacrone (14), 9-hydroxyeudesma-3,7(11)dien-6-one (19),
eudesma-4,7(11),dien-8-one (20), eudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (21) and eudesma-4(15),7(11)-dien-8-one
2–
24). Some of the generated
2
), 4,5-epoxygermacrone ( ),
3
7
(
(
22). Compounds, 7,11-9,10-diepoxigermacr-4,5-en-8-ol (17), 7,11-epoxieudesma-4,7(11)-dien-8-one
23) and 7,11-epoxieudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (24) are described for the first time. The biocidal
activity of most of these compounds was assayed against the tick Hyalomma lusitanicum. The acaricidal
effects of compound 24 were four times higher than that of germacrone ( ). Compound is an insect
1
2
antifeedant a thousand times more potent than germacrone against Rhopalosiphum padi, which makes
this substance a promising selective antifeedant against this cereal pest.
Keywords: natural products; organic synthesis; bioactive compounds; insecticidal; ixodicidal
1. Introduction
Germacrone (
macrorhyzum (Hungary chemotype) [
ixodicidal activity against the tick Hyalomma lusitanicum along with antifeedant effects against the
insect pests Spodoptera littoralis Boisd, Myzus persicae Sulz, and Rhopalosiphum padi, with compound
being, to a large extent, responsible for these activities [ ]. Additionally, Benelli et al. report both the
insecticidal activity of germacrone ( ) against mosquito larvae (Culex quinquefasciatus) [ ], and also its
1) is a sesquiterpene isolated in significant amounts from the essential oil of Geranium
1
]. This essential oil shows antifeedant effects against aphids and
1
1
1
2
acaricidal effects against Tetranychus urticae [3].
Regarding the contact toxicity of germacrone against Tribolium castaneum, Garc
ía et al. report
that germacrone results in not being toxic [4], whereas Liang et al. confirm its contact toxicity [5].
The difference in the used concentrations may be argued to rationalize this discrepancy.
Molecules 2019, 24, 2898; doi:10.3390/molecules24162898
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
2 of 15
Germacrol (2), the alcohol resulting from the reduction of the carbonyl group of germacrone,
results active in choice bioassays against T. castaneum, presenting more activity that germacrone (
1) [4].
Germacrone ( ) is also used as starting material for the synthesis of 9-methylgermacrene to be used in
1
mosquito control compositions [6].
The significance of the activities reported for germacrone (1) prompted Navarro-Rocha et al. to
address the domestication and cultivation of its natural source, G. macrorhyzum (Hungary chemotype),
for the sustainable production of this natural product. In this context, and after considering the particular
functionality of this molecule [
both new ixodicidal agents and new aphid antifeedants. Thus, 23 compounds were generated from
germacrone ( ), mostly after one or two chemical steps, and their biocide activity against the target
7,8], we selected germacrone as a series lead for the development of
1
species was tested and compared to that of germacrone (1).
2. Results and Discussion
Germacrone (1) presents an appropriate molecular structure and functionality to be used in a
reagent-based approach as a source of chemical diversity. Figure 1 shows some of the transformations
planned to be carried out.
Figure 1. Generation of structural diversity from germacrone (1).
Some of the compounds tested were synthesized following protocols previously reported by some
of us, and include only one or two synthetic steps from germacrone (1) [7].
The synthesis of compounds
) with mCPBA yields a mixture of epoxides
natural products obtained from the rhizomes of several Curcuma species [
of 1(10)-epoxygermacrone ( ) triggered by the Lewis acid InBr3 results in the generation of the
spiro-alcohols (30%). Dess-Martin oxidation of produces the corresponding ketone with an
acceptable yield. Treatment of 4,5-epoxygermacrone ( ) with GaCl3 as a Lewis acid causes the opening
of to give a natural product known as gajutsulactone A ( ) (72%) [12], together with minor amounts
of diketone ( ) (18%). On the other hand, the treatment of with titanocene monochloride and the
subsequent acetylation produces the mixture of acetates 9–10.
2–
10 are summarized in Scheme 1. Direct epoxidation of germacrone
in a 4:1 ratio. Epoxides and are also
11]. The ionic opening
(1
2–
3
2
3
9–
2
4–5
4
–5
6
3
2
7
8
3

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
3 of 15
Scheme 1. Synthesis of racemic 2–10 from germacrone (1). Yield of the isolated products is shown.
Attempts to achieve the chemoselective epoxidation of the exocyclic double bond of
1
using
H2O2/NaOH in different solvents were unsuccessful, since the isomerization of the double bond 1,(10
)
took place before the start of the epoxidation process. Compound 13 was then obtained following the
protocol described by Enev and Tsankova [13], although varying the vanadium species used for the
C7–C11 selective epoxidation of 11 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of racemic epoxide 13. Yield of the isolated products is shown.
Epoxide 13 shows in its 1H-NMR at room temperature three sets of signals that can be attributed
to three energetically similar conformers, with relatively high barriers of interconnection between
them. The three sets of signals appear better resolved when the NMR spectrum was performed at
◦
−
20 C (Figure 2, see also Supplementary Material). The ability of the ten-membered ring of the
germacradiene species to undergo conformational changes is well known, and has been the subject
of multiple computational studies [14 19]. This conformational flexibility plays an important role in
their biosynthetic transformation to other sesquiterpene skeletons [20 21], and in the reactivity of these
–
,
compounds, since the spatial disposition of the different conformers determines the outcome of the
corresponding reactions [22,23].
This prompted us to undertake a computational study of compound 13. Initially, a conformational
hybrid search method recommended for macrocyclic systems [24] and implemented in Macromodel [25],
allowed the detection of 8 conformers for each of the C7 epimers of compound 13, which were
subsequently optimized with Gaussian16 [26] using the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) [27,28] level of theory.
The 8 main conformers found for the 7S-epimer are represented in Figure 3. These conformers are
described as up–up (UU), up–down (UD), down–up (DU) and down–down (DD), depending upon
the orientation of the C14 and C15 methyl groups, in accordance with the terminology introduced by
Watson and Kashyap [19].

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
4 of 15
Figure 2. 1H-NMR spectrum of epoxide 13 at
of olefinic signals attributable to the three conformers of this molecule existing in solution.
−
20 ◦C. Grouped in red, blue and green are the three sets
Figure 3. Main conformers of the 7S-epimer of epoxide 13. Relative free energies (red) to the conformer
UU in kcal/mol (B3LYP-6-31+G(d,p)).
The four conformations with the down disposition of ketone at C8 are in-between 5 to 8 kcal/mol
less stable than the global minimum conformer UU with the ketone at C8 also up, so their population
contribution in the conformational equilibrium of this compound will be practically null, according to
the Boltzman distribution equation. From the four lower energy conforms, DD and UD conformers
possess free energy values 0.7–0.8 kcal/mol higher than the global minimum UU, while the fourth
conformer is 1.7 kcal/mol higher in its free energy value. These data would point to the possibility of
the coexistence of different conformations in its structure at room temperature.
In order to justify the observation of three sets of signals in the 1H-NMR spectrum of epoxide 13
conformational exchange studies were undertaken between the three lowest-energy conformations by
rotation around the two planes of both double bonds present in the molecule. These barriers of exchange
between the three conformations (Figures 4–6), (although surmountable at room temperature), are
,

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
5 of 15
relatively high (around 16 kcal/mol), which would suggest a low rate of exchange between conformers,
and therefore a differentiation in the NMR spectrum.
Figure 4. Barrier of exchange between conformations UU and UD and the transition state between
both of them.
Figure 5. Barrier of exchange between conformations UU and DU and the transition state between
both of them.
Finally, the theoretical 1H–1H nuclear coupling constants (JH–H) were calculated by applying
the scaled proton-proton Bally and Rablen methodology [29] for the three most stable conformers of
compound 13. These values were compared with the experimental data measured in dichloromethane at
−
10 ◦C. Gratifyingly, a remarkable coincidence was observed between the theoretical and experimental
data (Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison between the theoretical coupling constant for conformer UU (JUU), DD (JDD) and
UD (JUD) and the corresponding experimental values (Jexp) measured for compound 13.
JUU
JExp
JDD
JExp
JUD
JExp
a
H1-2a
H1-2b
H5-6a
H5-6b
3.6
12.3
3.6
12.3
3.9
10.0
6.7
12.5
7.6
9.9
10.4
6.3
7.5
7.5
10.4
5.9
a
12.3
a
10.7
7.0
12.1
11.9
a
The value of these coupling constants could not be measured accurately, although they must be close to 2 Hz.

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
6 of 15
Figure 6. Barrier of exchange between conformations DD and DU and the transition state between
both of them.
A final support to both experimental and theoretical data was found after analyzing the NOEDIFF
experiments performed in compound 13 (Figure 7). These data also suggests that the DD, UU and UD
conformers were the three ones existing in dichloromethane solution for this substance.
Figure 7. Observed NOEs (indicated by blue and red arrows) for the three conformers of 13 (UU, DD
and UD) existing in solution.
Getting back to the preparation of derivatives of
1
, isogermacrone (14) was obtained from
1 after
NaOEt-mediated isomerization to afford a 86% yield of the natural product 14
[30]. The chemoselective
epoxidation of the conjugated double bond of 14 employing alkaline H2O2 in EtOH affords epoxide
15 (20%) (Scheme 3). Epoxide 15 could be generated more efficiently by direct epoxidation of
isogermacrone with H2O2 in EtOH (65%).
LAH-mediated reduction of isogermacrone (14) yields isogermacrol (16) (54%). The NMR spectra
of this molecule only shows acceptable resolution when performed at high temperature. The lack of
resolution at room temperature can be attributed to the existence of coalescence phenomena at this
temperature. The epoxydation of isogermacrol (16) was not selective and diepoxide 17 was originated
after a vanadium-catalyzed double epoxidation. The treatment of isogermacrone (14) with mCPBA
leads selectively to 4,5-epoxyderivative 18, which was converted to eudesmanone 19, via a cyclization
process triggered by diethylaluminium chloride [10]. Compound 19 is a natural product isolated from
Curcuma phaeocaulis [31].
Finally, epoxyeudesmenes 23 and 24 are obtained again in only two steps. The first one involves a
Lewis acid-mediated cyclization of germacrone (
and 22 (3%). These three eudesmanes are natural products isolated from different essential oils [32
1
) to afford eusdesmadienes 20 (15%) and 21 (24%)
34].
–
The epoxydation of 20 and 21 with the alkaline peroxide system H2O2/NaOH affords epoxides 23 and
24 with acceptable yields (Scheme 4).

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
7 of 15
Scheme 3. Synthesis of racemic isogermacrone derivatives. The yield of isolated products is shown.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of racemic epoxyeudesmenes 23 and 24. Yield of isolated products is shown.
At this point, we tested the acaricidal of germacrone ( ) and of most of its derivatives against the
1
hard tick H. lusitanicum. The results obtained are shown in Table 2.
The most active ixodicidal compounds result in being epoxyeudesmene 24 and isogermacrone
14, and then, germacrone (
1
), 7,11-epoxigermacrone (13), and 4,5-epoxigermacrone (3). The bicyclic
diketone , 1,10-epoxigermacrona (
8
2
), 9,10-epoxiisogermacrona (15), lactone (gajutsulactone A) and
7
eudesmane 19 were the less active derivatives. Epoxyeudesmene 24, presenting an LD50 four times
higher than that of germacrone (1), may be considered a promising ixodicidal candidate.
From a structure-activity approach, isogermacrone (14) is closely-related to germacrone (
whereas compounds 13 and 24 contain an epoxide close the carbonyl group, instead of a double bond.
All this seems to indicate that the presence of an epoxy function located in the position to the
1),
α,β
carbonyl group enhances the ixodicidal activity. Both substances may be considered analogs of the
sesquiterpene with eremophilane skeleton ligudicine reported as a strong ixodicidal [35]. On the other
hand, the presence of an epoxide at C4–C5 (
does the existence of a keto group in a cyclooctane ring (
must be responsible for the observed activity. Finally, other structural modifications in
presence of a lactone instead of the ketone, or the isomerization of the double bond, cause a significant
decrease of the activity. Nine molecules ( 10 and 17 21) result in being inactive. In this case,
the disappearance of the enone ( 10) or the presence of the highly strained spirane system may well
3
) does not affect the activity of these compounds, nor
). In these cases, the enone functionality
, such as the
8
1
4
–6
,
9
–
–
9–

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
8 of 15
be the causes of the inactivity. The antifeedant effects of these germacrone derivatives against the
insect pest S. littoralis Boisd, M. persicae Sulz, and R. padi L were also tested (Table 3). None of the
compounds assayed improve the moderate-high activity of germacrone against S. littoralis. Only
diketone
8
presents a similar activity, whereas the epoxyderivatives
2
and
3, the diepoxide 17 and the
acetylated tricycles
9 and 10 result in being less active than germacrone. Similar results were found
with M. persicae.
Table 2. Acaricidal activity of germacrone derivatives against a H. lusitanicum Koch.
% Mortality a
Effective Lethal Doses (mg/mL)
Compound
b
b
10(mg/mL)
LD50
LD90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
100 ± 0
100 ± 0
98.3 ± 1.7
45.3 ± 24.9
8.6 ± 12.1
42.6 ± 2.5
100 ± 0
100 ± 0
-
1.08(0.7–1.38)
2.7(2.43–3.01)
1.47(1.16–1.76)
3.13(2.66–3.93)
4.1(3.67–4.77)
3.45(2.48–4.22)
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.44(2.08–2.79)
4.47(3.95–5.27)
<1.25
-
<1.25
-
9
10
11
13
14
15
17
19
20
0 ± 0
-
-
-
-
24.6 ± 0.6
100 ± 0
100 ± 0
100 ± 0
32.1 ± 17.3
0 ± 0
1.21(1.04–1.4)
0.96(0.88–1.05)
2.43(2.12–2.89)
1.39(1.25–1.56)
~2.32
-
-
-
~2.98
-
-
-
0
21
23
0
-
-
100 ± 0
91.9 ± 0.6
100
4.14(3.85–4.48)
0.23(0.12–0.47)
0.18(0.16–0.20)
6.33(5.82–7.04)
1.91(1.57–2.54)
0.27(0.24–0.31)
24
Thymol c
a
b
Data corrected according to Schenider Orelli’s formula. Doses needed to give 50 and 90% mortality (95%
c
Confidence Limits). From Navarro-Rocha et al. [1].
Table 3. Antifeedant effects of germacrone derivatives against S. littoralis, M. persicae and R. padi.
Effective doses (EC50 in mg/mL) have been included for the positive controls azadiractin (AZA) and
farnesol (FAR).
S. littoralis
M. persiscae
%SI a
R. padi
Compound
%FI a
%SI a
b
b
b
EC50
EC50
EC50
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
17
98.6 ± 0.6
76.93 ± 6.7
69.9 ± 11.3
-
1.9(0.1–3.6)
82.2 ± 5.0
69.0 ± 7.8
64.0 ± 8.9
60.6 ± 6.8
61.6 ± 9.1
75.6 ± 7.2
91.0 ± 2.6
88.5 ± 3.1
45.0 ± 9.1
66.1 ± 7.4
71.4 ± 6.1
75.0 ± 5.1
50.4 ± 9.3
55.8 ± 9.8
48.5 ± 9.2
2.8(2.2–3.4)
69.6 ± 6.5
97.8 ± 1.0
94.5 ± 1.7
-
97.3 ± 1.3
98.3 ± 1.2
-
<5
<5
<5
-
<5
~2.5
<5
<5
-
-
-
-
<5
-
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
-
0.006 (0.27–0.2)
0.2 (-0.1–0.4)
-
61.1 ± 11.7
90.8 ± 3.3
73.8 ± 15.4
78.6 ± 12.7
54.3 ± 8.71
54.6 ± 9.4
49.8 ± 11.3
54.0 ± 11.0
79.7 ± 7.1
53.9 ± 9.6
33.9 ± 15.6
0.02 (0.006–0.07)
0.8 (0.6–1.0)
-
-
-
-
38.44 ± 8.8
92.7 ± 2.2
84.4 ± 6.5
69.3 ± 7.2
86.0 ± 4.5
87.0 ± 4.5
52.5 ± 8.8
<5
<5
2.3 (2.1–2.5)
<5
3.69 (3.3–4.0)
1.8 (1.4–2.1)
1.5 (1.1–1.9)
-
1.0(0.01–1.4)
-
-
-
23
24
-
AZA c RY
FAR d
-
-
0.5
×
10−6 (0.2
×
10−8–0.7
×
10−4
)
-
14.9 (12.1–18.3)
1.7 (1.2–2.7)
a
%FI/SI = (1
−
(T/C))
×
100, where T and C are feeding/settling on treated and control leaf disks at a dose of 5 mg/mL.
b
c
EC50, effective dose (mg/mL) to give a 50% inhibition (95% Confidence Limits). From Gonz
ález-Coloma et al.
d
[36]. From Santana et al. [37].

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
9 of 15
Thus, only 15 shows activity comparable to that of germacrone. Four compounds, 2, 8, 10 and 13,
present low-moderate activity, and the remaining ones were inactive, or show very low activity.
Much more interesting are the results obtained against R. padi. Thus, two compounds,
1,10-epoxygermacrone (
values: 6
10−3 and 2
antifeedants against this cereal pest.
Four other molecules ( 17 and 23) show high activity. Finally, compounds 13 and 15 present
2
×
) and gajutsulactone A (
7), result in being very active against this aphid (EC50
×
10−2). These data convert these two substances into promising selective
3, 8,
moderate activity, while the remaining compounds show no relevant effect.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Instruments and Chemicals
Silica gel SDS 60 (35–70 µm) was used for flash column chromatography. NMR spectra were
acquired with Varian Direct-Drive 600 (1H 600 MHz/13C 150 MHz), Varian Direct-Drive 500 (1H
500 MHz/13C 125 MHz) and Varian Direct-Drive 400 (1H 400 MHz/13C 100 MHz). Accurate mass
determinations were achieved with a SYNAPT G2-Si Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA,
USA) equipped with high-efficiency T-Wave ion mobility and an orthogonal Z–spray
™ electrospray
ionization (ESI) source. MassLynx v.4.1 software was used for HRMS instrument control, peak
detection, and integration. The reactions were monitored by TLC, which were performed on 0.25-mm
E. Merck silica gel plates (60F-254) and involves the use of UV light for visualization and solutions
of phosphomolybdic acid in EtOH, and heat as the developing agents. HPLC with UV light and RI
detection was also used. The reagents were purchased at the highest quality that was commercially
available, and were used without further purification.
3.2. Synthesis
Compounds 1–6, 9–10, 14, and 18–19 were prepared as described previously by some of us [7].
3.2.1. Cyclization of 4,5-epoxygermacrone (3) with GaCl3
To a solution of 4,5-epoxygermacrone (
0.1 mmol) was added under an argon atmosphere at
and monitored by thin-layer chromatography analysis. Upon consumption of the starting material
the mixture was evaporated in vacuo. The crude products were purified by flash chromatography
3
) (150mg, 0.64 mmol) in dry DCM (10 mL) GaCl3 (11 mg,
◦
−
20 C. This mixture was stirred for 90 min
(H:MTBE, 7:3) to obtain 108 mg of
previously [7].
7 (72%) and 27 mg of 8 (18%). Compounds 7 and 8 were described
3.2.2. Synthesis of 7,11-epoxygermacrone (13)
To a solution of (1.5 g, 6.8 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL) under argon atmosphere was added 200 mg
of LiAlH4 at
10 ◦C. The reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature for 10 min and monitored by
1
−
thin-layer chromatography analysis. Upon consumption of the starting material, 0.15 mL of water, a
solution of 6 N NaOH (0.15 mL) and 0.6 mL of water were added dropwise. The mixture was filtered
over silica gel and Na2SO4 (2:1) and washed with MTBE. The reaction was evaporated in vacuo to
obtain 1.4 g of 11 (94%). Spectroscopic data of germacrol (11) were previously described [4].
To a solution of germacrol (11) (1000 mg, 4.54 mmol) in benzene (25 mL) under an argon
atmosphere was added 37 mg of VOSO4 (0.23 mmol). After the reaction mixture was heated at reflux
temperature for 10 min, 1.6 mL of t-BuOOH (9.08 mmol) was added. The reaction was then refluxed
for 30 additional min and monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Upon consumption of the starting
material, the mixture was diluted with 250 mL of EtOAc, washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO3
(3
×
100 mL) and brine (3
×
100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated in
vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (H:MTBE, 9:1) to obtain 616 mg of
7,11-epoxyisogermacrol (12) (60%). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
1
δ
4.82 (dd, J = 11.8, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.51

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
10 of 15
(d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (dd, J = 14.8, 11.3 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H),
2.44 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (td, J = 12.3, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.29–2.19 (m, 2H), 2.09 (dd, J = 12.4, 5.0 Hz,
1H), 2.00 (td, J = 12.1, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 1.60 (s, 3H), 1.55 (d, 6H), 1.46 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
δ
134.52, 133.32, 129.78, 123.98, 72.48, 70.46, 63.38, 46.28, 38.73, 35.25, 25.22, 22.25, 21.20, 16.66, 16.39.
HRMS (ESI+) m/z calculated for C15H24O2 [M + H]+ 237.1855, found 237.1838.
To a solution of 12 (160 mg, 0.68 mmol) in dry DMF (3.5 mL) under an argon atmosphere, 1.8
g of PDC (4.78 mmol) were added at 0 ◦C. The reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature for
30 min and monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Upon consumption of the starting material, the
reaction was diluted in 35 mL of MTBE and washed with 35 mL of water. The aqueous layer was then
washed with MTBE (3
×
20 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine (3
×
20 mL), dried
over Na2SO4 and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography
1
(H:MTBE, 6:1) to obtain 101 mg of 7,11-epoxygermacrone (13) (41%). H-NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2,
−
10 ◦C). Signals assigned to conformer UU:
δ
5.09 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 3.8 (d, J
= 9,6 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2,38 (m, 1H), 2,29 (d, 9.5 Hz, 1H), 2.16 (m, 1H), 2.07 (m, 1H),
1.93 (dd, J = 13.9, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 1.6 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H). Signals assigned to conformer DD: 4.87 (J =
δ
12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (dd, J = 10.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.02–1.92 (m, 2H), 2.76 (dd, J = 14.3, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (m,
1H), 2.17 (m,1H), 2.12 (m, 1H), 2.07 (m, 1H), 1.82 (s, 3H), 1.56 (s, 3H). Signals assigned to conformer
UD:
5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (d, J = 9,3 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (m,1H), 2.18 (m, 2H), 2.10 (m, 1H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.5 (s, 3H).
13C-NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2). Signals assigned to conformer UU:
207.5, 133.3, 122.4, 48.2, 37.8, 27.6,
23.5, 16.0, 15.3. Signals assigned to conformer DD: 207.0, 132.9, 122.9, 50.2, 28.5, 24.5, 23.3, 19.5, 15,7.
Signals assigned to conformer UD: 206.9, 130.7, 121.4, 49.9, 28.7, 23.4, 15.8, 15.6. HRMS (ESI+) m/z
δ 5.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz,1H) 4.74 (dd, J = 10.4,5.6 Hz,1H), 3.78 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (dd, J = 13.5,
δ
δ
δ
calculated for C15H22O2 [M + H]+ 235.1698, found 235.1685.
3.2.3. Synthesis of 9,10-epoxyisogermacrone (15)
To a solution of
1 (200 mg, 0.92 mmol) in EtOH (5 mL) was added 0.5 mL of H2O2 (30%) and
0.5 mL of a solution of 5N NaOH dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 40 days at room
temperature and monitored by thin-layer chromatography analysis. Upon consumption of the starting
material, the mixture was diluted with 75 mL of MTBE, washed with brine (3
×
20 mL), dried over
Na2SO4 and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (H:MTBE,
1
9:1) to obtain 90 mg of 14 (41%) and 64 mg of 15 (20%). H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 85 ◦C)
δ
5.17
(dd, J = 9.1, 6.5, 1H), 3.59 (s, 1H), 2.98 (dd, J = 15.1, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.90–2.85 (m, 1H), 2.16–2.11 (ddd, J
= 13.6, 8.6, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.98 (dt, J = 12.9, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.74 (s, 3H), 1.71–1.70 (m, 1H), 1.68 (bs, 3H),
1.68–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.24–1.20 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6, 85 ◦C)
δ
204.98, 136.74, 135.68, 130.70, 123.17, 67.99, 65.33, 37.59, 28.30, 27.44, 22.11, 21.72, 21.52, 19.97, 15.24.
HRMS (ESI+) m/z calculated to C15H23O2 [M + H]+ 235.1698, found 235.1696.
To a solution of 14 (100 mg, 0.46 mmol) in 2.5 mL of EtOH) was added 0.25 mL of H2O2 (30%)
and 0.25 mL of a solution of 5N NaOH dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 48 h at room
temperature, and then diluted with 40 mL of MTBE, washed with brine (3
and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (H:MTBE, 4:1) to
×
10 mL), dried over Na2SO4
obtain 70 mg of 15 (65%).
3.2.4. Synthesis of 7,11-9,10-diepoxygermacr-4,5-en-8-ol (17)
To a solution of 14 (419 mg, 1.9 mmol) in dry THF (23 mL) under argon atmosphere, was added
108 mg of LiAlH4 at –10 ◦C. The reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature for 100 min and
monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Upon consumption of the starting material the reaction
mixture was diluted with MTBE, and then, 1 mL of water, 1 mL of 6N NaOH and 3 mL of water were
added dropwise. Then the reaction was filtered over silica gel and Na2SO4 (2:1) and washed with
EtOAc. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography
1
(H:MTBE, 4:1) to obtain 227 mg of isogermacrol (16) (54%). H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 80 ◦C)
δ

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
11 of 15
5.26 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (bs, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (dd, J = 14.5, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (t, J =
12.3 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 14.1, 9.9, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.07–1.98 (dp, J = 26.4, 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.87 (d, J = 2.1 Hz,
3H), 1.83–1.77 (m, 1H), 1.64 (s, 3H), 1.62 (s, 3H), 1.60–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.50 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz,
DMSO-d6, 80 ◦C):
δ 132.4, 128.5, 72.6, 43.5, 41.3, 34.4, 31.5, 25.6, 24.6, 24.5, 22.5, 18.0. HRMS (ESI+) m/z
calculated to C15H25O [M + H]+ 221.1905, found 221.1897.
To a solution of 16 (227 mg, 1.04 mmol) in dry benzene (10 mL) under argon atmosphere, was
added 14 mg of VO(acac)2. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at refluxing temperature. Then,
0.37 mL of t-BuOOH (3.2 mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred for 30 min at reflux temperature,
and monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Upon consumption of the starting material, the mixture
was diluted with 180 mL of EtOAc, washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (3 x 50 mL), brine
(3 x 50 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash
chromatography (H:MTBE, 3:2) to obtain 100 mg of 7,11-9,10-diepoxigermacr-4,5-en-8-ol (17) (39%).
1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
1H), 2.61 (dd, J = 13.9, 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (s, 1H), 2.26–2.12 (m, 3H), 1.91–1.74 (m, 3H), 1.67 (s, 3H),
1.65 (s, 3H), 1.48 (s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.32–1.26 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3):
138.22, 119.77,
δ 4.97 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 3.56 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (dd, J = 9.2, 0.9 Hz,
δ
69.42, 67.03, 66.89, 63.28, 62.48, 36.81, 31.86, 27.91, 22.29, 22.03, 21.95, 21.44, 15.29. HRMS (ESI+) m/z
calculated to C15H25O3 [M + H]+ 253.1804, found 253.1794.
3.2.5. Cyclization of germacrone (1) with GaCl3
To a solution of
1 (150 mg, 0.69 mmol) in dry DCM (7 mL) under argon atmosphere, 12 mg of
GaCl3 (0.069 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 40 min at room temperature and
monitored by thing layer chromatography. Upon consumption of the starting material the reaction
was evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (H:MTBE, 95:5)
to obtain 22 mg of eudesma-4,7(11)-dien-8-one (20) (15%), 37 mg of eudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (21
)
(24%) and 4 mg of eudesma-4(15),7(11)-dien-8-one (22) (3%). Compounds 20 and 21 were previously
described by some of us [7].
3.2.6. Epoxidation of eudesma-4,7(11)-dien-8-one (20) with NaOH and H2O2
To a solution of 20 (298 mg, 1.37 mmol) in MeOH (45 mL), was added 1 mL of 2N NaOH and 2.7
mL of H2O2 (30% in water) at 0 ◦C. The reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature for 22 h and
monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Upon consuming of the starting material, the mixture was
diluted with 155 mL of MTBE, washed with brine (3
×
50 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated in
vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (H:MTBE, 4:1) to obtain 137 mg of
1
7,11-epoxyeudesma-4,7(11)-dien-8-one (23) (36%). H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 2.77 (d, J = 17.3 Hz,
1H), 2.68 (d, J = 17.3 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (s, 2H), 2.04–1.95 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.61 (m, 2H), 1.59 (s, 3H), 1.56–1.48
(m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.42–1.36 (m, 1H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3):
δ
208.00,
128.77, 128.52, 68.32, 65.64, 53.78, 37.83, 35.01, 31.65, 29.81, 26.54, 20.12, 19.32, 19.17, 18.63. HRMS (ESI+)
m/z calculated to C15H23O2 [M + H]+ 235.1698, found 235.1687.
3.2.7. Epoxidation of eudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (21) with NaOH and H2O2
To a solution of 21 (98 mg, 0.45 mmol) in MeOH (15 mL), was added 0.5 mL of 2N NaOH solution
and 0.8 mL of H2O2 (30% in water) at a temperature of 0 ◦C. The reaction mixture was stirred at that
temperature for 22 h and monitored by thin-layer chromatography analysis. Upon consumption of the
starting material, the mixture was then diluted in 60 mL of MTBE, washed with brine (3
×
20 mL),
dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography
1
(H:MTBE, 4:1) to obtain 42 mg of 7,11-epoxyeudesma-3,7(11)-dien-8-one (24)(40%). H-NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3):
2H), 1.96–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.63 (s, 3H), 1.53–1.50 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.42 (m, 1H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 0.99
(s, 3H). 13C-NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3):
208.20, 133.15, 122.26, 68.15, 65.19, 54.62, 43.23, 37.01, 33.63,
δ 5.43 (bs, 1H) 2.40–2.31 (m, 2H), 2.20 (d, J = 17.7 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.09–2.01 (m,
δ

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
12 of 15
29.48, 22.46, 21.13, 20.68, 19.61, 18.62. HRMS (ESI+) m/z calculated para C15H23O2 [M + H]+ 235.1698,
found 235.1697.
3.3. Computational Analysis
A conformational search with Molecular Mechanics (MMFF94) was carried out with the
Macromodel Package [25]. Geometry optimizations and energy calculations were performed with
Gaussian 16 [26] using DFT [38–40] at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) [27,28] level of theory. Frequency
calculations (at 298.15 K) at the same level of theory were used to confirm the nature of all stationary
points. Transition states were identified by the presence of a single imaginary frequency. To verify
that the TSs correspond to the expected interchange between conformers, intrinsic reaction coordinate
(IRC) [41–43] calculations were performed at the same level, B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p). The reported energies
are expressed in kcal/mol and correspond to relative free energies, while those that appear in the
IRC plot, expressed also in kcal/mol, correspond to relative electronic energies, and do not include
zero-point energy corrections.
1
For computation of H–1H coupling constants, we have applied the scaled proton-proton
recommendations by Bally T and Rablen [(B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)//B3LYP/b3lyp/6-31g(d)], through a
multiplication of the calculated Fermi contact terms by 0.9155 [29].
3.4. Biological Evaluation
S. littoralis, M. persicae and R. padi colonies were reared on artificial diet [44], bell pepper (Capsicum
annuum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants, respectively. The plants are grown from seeds in pots
with commercial substrate. The plants for rearing aphids are infected regularly (bell pepper plants
with 4 leaves, barley plants of 10 cm length). The insect colonies and host plants were maintained at 22
± 1 ◦C, >70% relative humidity with a photoperiod of 16:8 h (L:D) in a growth chamber.
3.4.1. Antifeedant Activity
The upper surface of C. anuum and H. vulgare leaf disks or fragments (1.0 cm2) were treated with
10
50
µ
L of the test substance. The crude extracts and products were tested at an initial dose of 100 or
µ
g/cm2, respectively. Five Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) or twenty ventilated plastic boxes (2
×
2 cm) with two newly molted S. littoral is L6 larvae (<24 h) or ten apterous aphid adults (24–48 h
old), each were allowed to feed at room temperature for S. littoralis (<2 h), or in a growth chamber
for the aphids (24 h, environmental conditions as above). Each experiment was repeated 2–3 times
(SE < 10%) and terminated when the consumption of the control disks reached 65–75% for S. littoralis,
or after 24 h for the aphids. The leaf disk area consumed was measured on their digitalized images
(Image J, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij). Settling was measured by counting the number of aphids settled
on each leaf fragment. Feeding or settling inhibition (%FI or %SI) was calculated as % FI/%SI = [1
−
(T/C)
×
100], where T and C are the consumption/settling of the treated and control leaf disks,
respectively. The antifeedant effects (% FI/SI) were analyzed for significance by the nonparametric
Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Extracts and compounds with an FI/SI > 75% were further tested in a dose-response experiment (3–4
serial dilutions) to calculate their relative potency (EC50, the effective dose to give a 50% feeding/settling
reduction) from linear regression analysis (% FI/SI on Log-dose) [45].
3.4.2. Ixodicidal Activity
H. lusitanicum-engorged female ticks were collected in central Spain (Finca La Garganta, Ciudad
Real) from their host (deer) and maintained at 22–24 ◦C and 70% RH until oviposition and egg hatch.
Resulting larvae (4–6 weeks old) were used for the bioassays [35]. Briefly, 50 µL of test solution were
added to 25 mg of powdered cellulose at different concentrations, and the solvent was evaporated.
For each test, three replicates with 20 larvae each were used. Dead ticks were counted after 24 h
of contact with the treated cellulose at the environmental conditions described, using a binocular

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
13 of 15
magnifying glass. The larvicidal activity data are presented as percent mortality corrected according to
Schneider-Orelli’s formula. Effective lethal doses (LC50 and LC90) were calculated by Probit Analysis
(5 serial dilutions, STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI, version 16.1.02).
4. Conclusions
Starting from the natural product germacrone (
have synthesized up to 23 derivatives in 1–3 steps by achieving different cyclizations and by varying
the oxidation state of germacrone ( ). Some of the synthesized substances are natural products. With
these derivatives, we performed ixodicidal tests against H. lusitanicum, and antifeedant tests against S.
littoralis, M. persicae, and R. padi. The most relevant results were obtained with the epoxyeudesmene 24
with four times higher ixodicidal activity than germacrone ( ). Additionally, 1,10-epoxygermacrone
) is one thousand times a more potent antifeedant than germacrone ( ) against R. padi, therefore
indicating that this molecule is a promising selective antifeedant against this cereal pest.
1), available from cultivated G. macrorrhizum, we
1
,
1
(2
1
Supplementary Materials: The supplementary material related to this article includes NMR spectra of new
compounds is available online.
Author Contributions: A.F.B., A.G.-C. and J.F.Q.d.M. conceived and designed the experiments; J.L.L.-P. and
E.G.d.L. performed the theoretical studies; A.G.P. and H.P.d.P. realized the synthetic work; A.G.-C. and A.S.O.
carried out the biological assays; A.F.B., A.G.-C., J.L.L.-P. and J.F.Q.d.M. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Funding: This research was funded by Grant CTQ-2015-64049-C3-3-R/CTQ2015-64049-C3-1-R; MINISTERIO DE
ECONOMÍA Y COMPETITIVIDAD, Spain (MINECO/FEDER).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Navarro-Rocha, J.; Barrero, A.F.; Burillo, J.; Olmeda, A.S.; González-Coloma, A. Valorization of essential oils
from two populations (wild and commercial) of Geranium macrorrhizum L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 116, 41–45.
[CrossRef]
2.
Benelli, G.; Pavela, R.; Iannarelli, R.; Petrelli, R.; Cappellacci, L.; Cianfaglione, K.; Afshar, F.H.; Nicoletti, M.;
Canale, A.; Maggi, F. Synergized mixtures of Apiaceae essential oils and related plant-borne compounds:
Larvicidal effectiveness on the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 96, 186–195.
[CrossRef]
3.
Benelli, G.; Pavela, R.; Canale, A.; Nicoletti, M.; Petrelli, R.; Cappellacci, L.; Galassi, R.; Maggi, F.
Isofuranodiene and germacrone from Smyrnium olusatrum essential oil as acaricides and oviposition
inhibitors against Tetranychus urticae: Impact of chemical stabilization of isofuranodiene by interaction with
silver triflate. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 693–699. [CrossRef]
4.
5.
García, M.; Donadel, O.J.; Ardanaz, C.E.; Tonn, C.E.; Sosa, M.E. Toxic and repellent effects of Baccharis
salicifolia essential oil on Tribolium castaneum. Pest Manag. Sci. 2005, 61, 612–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liang, J.Y.; Liu, X.T.; Gu, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.Y.; Lv, N.; Guo, S.S.; Wang, J.L.; Du, S.S.; Zhang, J. Chemical
constituents and insecticidal activity of the essential oils extracted from Artemisia giraldii and Artemisia
rubripes against two stored product insects. Med. Chem. 2016, 6, 396/1–396/5. [CrossRef]
6.
Hamilton, J.G.C.; Krishnakumari, B. Mistura rac
de seu is mero constituinte, m todos de controle ou monitoraç
de infecç o e de sintetizaç o de ( )-9-metilgermacreno, e, coleira de animal. BR PI0500799 (A) 2016.
Available online: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=
3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20060912&CC=BR&NR=PI0500799A&KC=A (accessed on
8 August 2019).
ê
mica, composto, uso de uma mistura rac
êmica ou
ô
ã
é
ã
o de mosquitos-p lvora, de prevenç
ó
ão
ã
±
7.
8.
P
é
rez Morales, M.C.; Catal
án, J.V.; Domingo, V.; Jaraíz, M.; Herrador, M.M.; Quílez del Moral, J.F.;
L
ó
pez-P rez, J.-L.; Barrero, A.F. Structural diversity from the transannular cyclizations of natural germacrone
é
and epoxy derivatives: A theoretical–experimental study. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 6598–6612. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Catal
án, J.V. Síntesis de terpenoides bioactivos usando sintones terpénicos y ciclaciones mediadas por Ti(III).
Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Granada, Granada, Spain, 20 December 2007.

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
14 of 15
9.
Ulubelen, A.; Gören, N.; Jakupovic, J. Germacrane derivatives from the fruits of Smyrnium creticum.
Phytochemistry 1986, 26, 312–313. [CrossRef]
10. Radulovic´, N.S.; Zlatkovic´, D.; Dekic´, M.; Stojanovic´-Radic´, Z. Further antibacterial geranium macrorrhizum
l. metabolites and synthesis of epoxygermacrones. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 542–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Yoshihara, M.; Shibuya, H.; Kitano, E.; Yanagi, K.; Kitagawa, I. The absolute stereostructure of (4s,
5s)-(+)-germacrone 4,5-epoxide from Zedoariae Rhizoma cultivated in Yakushima Island. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1984, 32, 2059–2062. [CrossRef]
12. Matsuda, H.; Morikawa, T.; Toguchida, I.; Ninomiya, K.; Yoshikawa, M. Medicinal Foodstuffs. XXVIII.
Inhibitors of nitric oxide production and new sesquiterpenes, zedoarofuran, 4-epicurcumenol, neocurcumenol,
gajutsulactones A and B, and zedoarolides A and B, from Zedoariae Rhizoma. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 49,
1558–1566. [CrossRef]
13. St. Enev, V.; Tsankova, E.T. Lewis acid catalysed rearrangement of 7,11-epoxyisogermacrone. Formation of a
new carbon skeleton. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 6399–6406. [CrossRef]
14. Maggio, A.M.; Barone, G.; Bruno, M.; Duca, D.; Rosselli, S. Conformational analysis and DFT calculations of
8α-hydroxy-germacradiene-6,12-olide derivatives. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 1116–1122. [CrossRef]
15. Jimeno, M.L.; del Carmen Apreda-Rojas, M.; Cano, F.H.; Rodríguez, B. NMR and x-ray conformational study
of artemisiifolin and three other related germacranolides. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2004, 42, 474–483. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
16. Milosavljevic´, S.; Juranic´, I.; Aljancˇic´, I.; Vajs, V.; Todorovic´, N. Conformational analysis of three
germacranolides by the PM3 semi-empirical method. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2003, 68, 281–289. [CrossRef]
17. Wong, H.-F.; Brown, G.D. Germacranolides from Artemisia myriantha and their conformation. Phytochemistry
2002, 59, 529–536. [CrossRef]
18. Kulyyasov, A.T.; Bagryanskaya, I.Y.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Shakirov, M.M.; Raldugin, V.A.; Adekenov, S.M.;
Seitembetov, T.S. Crystal and molecular structure of subchrysine (3-o-acetylridentine), a new germacranolide
from Artemisia subchrysolepis. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1998, 47, 1390–1394. [CrossRef]
19. Watson, W.H.; Kashyap, R.P. Conformations of germacra-1(10),4-dien-6,12-olides and -8,12-olides.
A
comparison of x-ray diffraction, NMR, and molecular mechanics derived conformations. J. Org. Chem. 1986
51, 2521–2524. [CrossRef]
,
20. Minnaard, A.J.; Wijnberg, J.B.P.A.; de Groot, A. The synthesis of germacrane sesquiterpenes and related
compounds. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 2115–2146. [CrossRef]
21. Barquera-Lozada, J.E.; Cuevas, G. Biogenesis of sesquiterpene lactones pseudoguaianolides from
germacranolides: Theoretical study on the reaction mechanism of terminal biogenesis of 8-epiconfertin.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 874–883. [CrossRef]
22. Marco, J.A.; Sanz-Cervera, J.F.; García-Lliso, V.; Domingo, L.R.; Carda, M.; Rodríguez, S.; López-Ortiz, F.;
Lex, J. Influence of conformational factors on acid-catalyzed cyclizations of germacranolides. Molecular
structure of the cyclization products of gallicin and 8
1837–1841. [CrossRef]
α-hydroxygallicin (Shonachalin A). Liebigs Ann. 1995,
23. Tashkhodzhaev, B.; Abduazimov, B.K. Stereochemistry of sesquiterpenes of the germacrane type.
Chem. Nat. Compd. 1997, 33, 382–388. [CrossRef]
24. Kolossváry, I.; Guida, W.C. Low Mode Search. An efficient, automated computational method for
conformational analysis: Application to cyclic and acyclic alkanes and cyclic peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 5011–5019. [CrossRef]
25. Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N.G.J.; Guida, W.C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.;
Still, W.C. Macromodel—an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules
using molecular mechanics. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440–467. [CrossRef]
26. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.;
Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. B.01 2016. Available online: https:
//gaussian.com/gaussian16/ (accessed on 5 August 2019).
27. Becke, A.D. A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98,
1372–1377. [CrossRef]
28. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98,
5648–5652. [CrossRef]

Molecules 2019, 24, 2898
15 of 15
1
29. Bally, T.; Rablen, P.R. Quantum-chemical simulation of H-NMR spectra. 2. Comparison of DFT-based
procedures for computing proton–proton coupling constants in organic molecules. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
4818–4830. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Bozhkova, N.V.; Stoev, G.; Orahovats, A.S.; Rizov, N.A. Sesquiterpene ketones from Geranium macrorrhizum.
Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 917–918. [CrossRef]
31. Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, Y.; Donkor, P.O.; Li, Q.; Gao, S.; Hou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Cui, J.; Ding, L.; et al. Eudesmane-type
sesquiterpenes from Curcuma phaeocaulis and their inhibitory activities on nitric oxide production in RAW
264.7 Cells. European, J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 5540–5548. [CrossRef]
32. Coll, J.C.; Bowden, B.F.; Tapiolas, D.M.; Willis, R.H.; Djura, P.; Streamer, M.; Trott, L. Studies of australian soft
corals—XXXV: The terpenoid chemistry of soft corals and its implications. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 1085–1092.
[CrossRef]
33. Nazaruk, J.; Kalemba, D.; Nazaruk, J.; Kalemba, D. Chemical composition of the essential oils from the roots
of Erigeron acris L. and Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. Molecules 2009, 14, 2458–2465. [CrossRef]
34. Endo, K.; Taguchi, T.; Taguchi, F.; Hikino, H.; Yamahara, J.; Fujimura, H. Antiinflammatory principles of
atractylodes Rhizomes. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1979, 27, 2954–2958. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Ruiz-Vásquez, L.; Olmeda, A.S.; Zúñiga, G.; Villarroel, L.; Echeverri, L.F.; González-Coloma, A.; Reina, M.
Insect antifeedant and ixodicidal compounds from Senecio adenotrichius. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600155.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. González-Coloma, A.; Gutiérrez, C.; Hübner, H.; Achenbach, H.; Terrero, D.; Fraga, B.M. Selective insect
antifeedant and toxic action of ryanoid diterpenes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4419–4424. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
37. Santana, O.; Reina, M.; Fraga, B.M.; Sanz, J.; González-Coloma, A. Insect antifeedant fatty acid esters and
phytosterols from Echium wildpretii. Chem. Biodiv. 2012, 9, 567–576.
38. Lynch, B.J.; Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. Effectiveness of diffuse basis functions for calculating relative energies by
density functional theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 1384–1388. [CrossRef]
39. Koch, W.; Holthausen, M.C. A Chemist’s Guide to Density Functional Theory, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2000.
40. Parr, R.G.; Yang, W. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Claredon Press: Oxford, UK, 1989.
41. Hratchian, H.P.; Schlegel, H.B. Using Hessian updating to increase the efficiency of a Hessian based
predictor-corrector reaction path following method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 61–69. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
42. Hratchian, H.P.; Schlegel, H.B. Accurate reaction paths using a Hessian based predictor–corrector integrator.
J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9918–9924. [CrossRef]
43. Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H.B. Improved algorithms for reaction path following: Higher-order implicit
algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 5853–5860. [CrossRef]
44. Poitout, S.; Bues, S. Elevage de plusieurs esp
milieu artificiel simplifiè. Ann. Zool. Ecol. Anim. 1970, 2, 79–91.
45. Burgueño-Tapia, E.; Castillo, L.; Gonz lez-Coloma, A.; Joseph-Nathan, P. Antifeedant and phytotoxic activity
èces de lépidotéres Noctundiae sur milieu artificiel riche et sur
á
of the sesquiterpene p-benzoquinone perezone and some of its derivatives. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34, 766–771.
[CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
©
2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).