We initiated our investigations through the development
of a robust, linker-functionalized planar cellulose support
(Scheme 1). Previous cellulose derivatization methods for
Scheme 1. Support Modification and Linker Installation
Figure 1. Schematic of the SPOT-synthesis process.
to conventional polystyrene resins, the hydrophilic, mechani-
cally robust membrane sheets are easy to manipulate during
synthesis and washing steps. Furthermore, cellulose mem-
branes are compatible with various on-support biological
screening methods, including protein-binding assays, enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and agar overlay.7
Despite the advantages outlined above, the application of
the SPOT-synthesis technique has been largely restricted to
the construction of simple peptide libraries.7 Examples of
nonpeptide libraries generated via SPOT-synthesis are scarce,
and most have been based on simple acylation chemistry.9
More challenging chemistry has not been pursued, in part,
because (1) SPOT-synthesis suffers from slow reaction rates
similar to conventional solid-phase synthesis and (2) general,
reproducible methods for heating spatially addressed reac-
tions are not available. We hypothesized that microwave
(MW) assistance could broaden the reaction scope of SPOT-
synthesis and facilitate the generation of complex small
molecule libraries. The use of MW irradiation as a non-
conventional heating method for organic synthesis has
increased over the past decade, primarily due to marked
reductions in reaction times and enhancements in conversion
and purity.10 To date, however, the generality and utility of
MW-assisted reactions on planar polymeric supports have
not been explored.5a,11
SPOT-synthesis have relied on reaction of cellulose with
epibromohydrin.7,11 We chose to avoid this toxic, expensive
reagent and found direct tosylation of support 18 to be an
effective method to activate cellulose prior to introduction
of diamine 2 as a “spacer” element. By controlling the
concentration of TsCl and reaction time, the loading level
of the support could be varied from 50 nmol/cm2 to 10 µmol/
cm2.17 Diamine 2 was installed as a “spacer” since this unit
has been shown to improve the accessibility of support-bound
molecules for subsequent reactions and on-support assays.11
MW irradiation of tosyl cellulose in neat diamine 2 (300
W) significantly expedited spacer incorporation; support 3
was generated in 15 min as opposed to the 6 h required for
similar incorporation using traditional methods (100 °C, in
a drying oven). We found MW heating of membranes in
shallow glass vessels to be straightforward and reproducible
using a commercial multimodal MW reactor.18 In contrast,
a household MW oven (Kenmore model 721; 300 W) gave
irreproducible results for heating planar support reactions and
underscores the importance of using dedicated, commercial
MW reactors for synthesis.5,10
We chose to examine the scope and limitations of MW-
assisted SPOT-synthesis through the preparation of libraries
of chalcone-derived molecules, as chalcone synthesis via
Claisen-Schmidt condensation has been performed with
success in solution under MW conditions previously.10,12
Chalcones can be derivatized easily to generate diverse
second-generation libraries.13,14 Further, chalcones present
a proven molecular scaffold for biological evaluation, as
certain derivatives exhibit potent and specific activities, e.g.,
activation of Sirtuin proteins15 and broad anticancer activity.16
We next introduced a versatile acid-cleavable, Wang-type
linker system onto amino-cellulose support 3 (Scheme 1).19
(13) Katritzky, A. R.; Serdyuk, L.; Chassaing, C.; Toader, D.; Wang,
X.; Forood, B.; Flatt, B.; Sun, C.; Vo, K. J. Comb. Chem. 2000, 2, 182-
185 and references therein.
(14) Powers, D. G.; Casebier, D. S.; Fokas, D.; Ryan, W. J.; Troth, J.
R.; Coffen, D. L. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4085-4096.
(15) Howitz, K. T.; Bitterman, K. J.; Cohen, H. Y.; Lamming, D. W.;
Lavu, S.; Wood, J. G.; Zipkin, R. E.; Chung, P.; Kisielewski, A.; Zhang,
L. L.; Scherer, B.; Sinclair, D. A. Nature 2003, 425, 191-196.
(16) Lawrence, N. J.; Rennison, D.; McGown, A. T.; Ducki, S.; Gul, L.
A.; Hadfield, J. A.; Khan, N. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 421-426.
(17) Functionalization levels were determined by quantitation of Fmoc-
derivatized amino-support 3 using UV spectroscopy (at 296 nm).
(18) All MW-assisted reactions on cellulose supports were performed
in a Milestone Ethos Microsynth multimodal reactor using power (wattage)
control. Temperature control was not possible due to the low solvent
volumes used. Supports were washed with various solvents and dried
routinely between each synthesis step; see the Supporting Information.
(9) For selected examples, see: (a) Scharn, D.; Germeroth, L.; Schneider-
Mergener, J.; Wenschuh, H. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 507-513. (b) Jobron,
L.; Hummel, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1621-1624. (c) Ast, T.;
Heine, N.; Germeroth, L.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Wenschuh, H. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4317-4318.
(10) For a recent MW review, see: Lidstrom, P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey,
B.; Westman, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225-9283.
(11) Scharn, D.; Wenschuh, H.; Reineke, U.; Schneider-Mergener, J.;
Germeroth, L. J. Comb. Chem. 2000, 2, 361-369.
(12) Babu, G.; Perumal, P. T. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 3677-3682.
2020
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 12, 2004