Photolysis of Heptanal
SCHEME 3. Expected Reaction Pathways Available to the
Hexyl Radical under NOx-Free Atmospheric Conditions
to the Norrish II decomposition channel. They could not detect
hexane with FTIR because of overlap with heptanal and did
not observe evidence for it with MS. As it seems unlikely that
decarbonylation is an accessible pathway for photoexcited
heptanal, it is possible that the other secondary sources of CO
become very significant at the high concentrations used by Tang
and Zhu14 in their experiments.
Experimental Section
Chamber Experiments. Very similar experiments have been
described in detail elsewhere24,25 and are only briefly outlined here.
Investigations of heptanal photolysis were performed in a 240
(experiments 1-3) or 1200 L (experiments 4 and 5) collapsible
Teflon reaction chamber (200 mil) at 296 ( 2 K and atmospheric
pressure. The large chamber was equipped with a Teflon mixing
fan (used while the chamber was filled), and both chambers were
surrounded by eight fluorescent UVB lamps (275-380 nm,
λmax ) 312 nm). In our chamber configuration, these lamps result
did not specify which products were used to derive this value.
A possible source of negative artifacts for these measurements
is reactions with OH or other radicals that may be more
important at the higher reactant concentrations used in these
studies.
Our theoretical results indicate that there is potential for
1-pentene and hydroxyethene to be the predominant products,
as the γ-H abstraction pathway is favored; however, the resulting
biradical can either decompose or cyclize. It must also be noted
that the theoretical percentages in Table 1 correspond to
generation of the biradicals, which can undergo further reactions
and undergo a reversible process22 in the gas phase.
Formation of Cyclic Alcohols. From a theoretical point of
view, a yield of cyclic alcohols of 20% is expected from the
δ-H abstraction pathway, and additional cyclic alcohols are
expected from the γ-H abstraction pathway, assuming an
irreversible pathway following biradical generation.22 Tadic´ et
al.13 postulated that cyclic alcohols were likely products of
heptanal photolysis but could not observe them with FTIR. Tang
and Zhu et al.14 estimated a yield for cyclic alcohols of 40%
using a residual gas analyzer to identify fragment ions that could
arise from cyclic alcohols. Given the complexity of the organics
in their experiments and the lack of authentic standards,
however, quantification is difficult with this method. Our
experimental evidence, together with the other studies, indicates
that yields of cyclic alcohols fall in the 15-30% range,
bracketed by the observation of likely peaks in our chromato-
grams at the low end and the yields of other products, which
account for most of the carbon, at the upper end.
Decarbonylation. We observe no evidence for a channel
producing CO and hexane (d, Scheme 1) in either of our
theoretical or experimental results. No traces of hexane were
observed in the GC-FID or SPME/GC-MS samples. Our
detection limit for n-hexane corresponds to a yield of about
0.1%. From an energetic point of view, it is known that the
experimentally observed activation energy for H-CO dissocia-
tion to CO and atomic hydrogen (path c in Scheme 1) is
relatively high, 15.8 kcal/mol,23 thus making such a process
rather unfavorable. Similarly, radical pair recombination, al-
though thermodynamically more advantageous, cannot compete
with the radical reactions with molecular oxygen.
in a heptanal photolysis rate of (1.65 ( 0.03) × 10-5 s-1
.
A small quantity of heptanal (purity 95%, used as received) was
slowly introduced into the chamber by evaporating it into the
purified air used to fill the chamber. Gas samples were automatically
collected from the chamber every 23 min and introduced, via a 2
mL sampling loop, into a GC-FID, equipped with a capillary column
(DB-1, 0.32 mm ID, 3 µm film, 30 m), programmed to 2 min at
-50 °C, then 14 °C/min to 170 °C. The GC-FID was calibrated
with a cyclohexane standard. Effective carbon numbers26 normalized
to the cyclohexane calibration were measured in our laboratory and
were used to calculate concentrations of hydrocarbons and carbonyl
compounds, as follows: hexanol 5.6, acetaldehyde 1.02, 1-pentene
5.0, heptanal 6.15, and hexanal 5.15.27 Concentrations and yields
derived with this method have overall uncertainties of (10%
(aliphatics) and (15% (oxygenates). Relative errors for a set of
reactants and products normalized to the same calibration standard
are about (5% and (10%, respectively.
The chamber was also sampled with SPME/GC-MS25 before and
after each experiment. Used this way, SPME provides qualitative
mass spectral information. Experiments were also monitored for
the production of organic acids using in-inlet derivatization/GC-
MS,24 but no acid formation was observed.
Quantum Mechanical and Chemical Kinetics Methods.
Quantum mechanical calculations were carried out using the
Gaussian 03 suite of programs.28 Density functional theory at the
(24) Orzechowska, G. E.; Nguyen, H. T.; Paulson, S. E. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2005, 109, 5366-5375.
(25) Orzechowska, G. E.; Paulson, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109,
5358-5365.
(26) Scanlon, J. T.; Willis, D. E. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1985, 333-340.
(27) Paulson, S. E.; Meller, R.; Chung, M.; Kramp, F. Final Report:
Total nonmethane organic carbon: DeVelopment and Validation of a new
instrument, and measurements of total nonmethane organic carbon and
C2-C7 hydrocarbons in the south coast air basin; California Air Resources
Board Report No. 95-335, 1999.
(28) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K.
N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.;
Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li,
X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.;
Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.;
Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich,
S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A.
D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A.
G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham,
M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian
03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
Tadic´ et al.13 also found no evidence for decarbonylation.
Tang and Zhu,14 on the other hand, assigned a large yield based
on FTIR measurements of CO, from which they subtracted HCO
measurements obtained with cavity ring down, assigning this
(22) Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; University Science
Books: Sausalito, 1991.
(23) Krasnoperov, L. N.; Chesnokov, E. N.; Stark, H.; Ravishankara,
A. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 11526-11536.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 17, 2006 6407