10.1002/anie.202006315
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
accumulates, more PutA are expressed to consume L-proline,
leaving D-proline behind. We inoculated wildtype E. coli
imino acid into DL-proline.[21] We validated the method by using
commercially available DL-proline (yield: 81%; ee >99%; Figure
S13). As such, two kinetic resolution methods are established to
obtain D- and L-proline, respectively.
BL21(DE3) strain in
a chemically defined medium with
commercially available L-proline, D-proline or DL-proline (5 g/L
each) as the sole carbon source (Figure 4b, S10-S11). After a
48-h aerobic incubation at 37 °C, L-proline was fully consumed
and cell density (OD600) of the E. coli strain reached ~3.8, while
the yield of D-proline from the kinetic resolution process was
99.4% (Figure 4b). Acetate, a commonly encountered aerobic
fermentation product, was not detected (detection limit: 0.1 g/L).
Based on materials balance, the consumed L-proline should be
converted into CO2 and biomass (e.g. nucleic acids, proteins
and lipids). As such, an effective kinetic resolution of DL-proline
by using E. coli fermentation is developed.
To summarize, we have developed renewable routes to
produce two value-added nitrogen-containing chemicals pyrrole
and D-proline from biomass-derived furfural via decarbonylation-
amination, carboxylation, hydrogenation and kinetic resolution.
This work showcases the possibility of establishing
organonitrogen chemical supply chain in biorefinery, via the
transformation of biomass derived feedstock into hub
organochemcials that can be diversified into a spectrum of end
products. It also provides an example for recovering original
stereo-structure of biomass, which was lost during the traditional
treatment process. A limitation of the current work is the loss of
CO (20% of carbon) in the first step. We attempted to produce
proline from 2-furoic acid and 2-methylfuran to prevent carbon
loss, but these two routes, so far, have not been successful
under applied conditions (Figure S14).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Tier-1 & Tier-2 projects from Singapore
Ministry of Education (R-279-000-462-112, R-279-000-479-112
and R-279-000-594-112) and the C4T Emerging Opportunities
Fund - EOF2 from Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research
and Education in Singapore Ltd (CARES) (R-279-000-604-592).
Dr. L. Di thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (Grant 21905144). We thank Daniel Tan, Jeff Zhou,
Smaranika Panda and You-Kang Lim (NUS) for their
assisstance on the kinetic resolution experiments, as well as
Prof. Alexei A Lapkin and Dr. Zhen Guo (Cambridge & NUS) for
inspirational discussions.
Keywords: furfural • pyrrole • proline • decarbonylation-
amination • kinetic resolution
[1]
a) A. Corma, S. Iborra, A. Velty, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2411-2502; b)
G. W. Huber, S. Iborra, A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4044-4098;
c) W. Schutyser, T. Renders, S. Van den Bosch, S.-F. Koelewijn, G.
Beckham, B. F. Sels, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 852-908; d) X. Wu, X.
Fan, S. Xie, J. Lin, J. Cheng, Q. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Wang, Nat. Catal.
2018, 1, 772-780; e) L. Dong, L. Lin, X. Han, X. Si, X. Liu, Y. Guo, F. Lu,
S. Rudic, S. F. Parker, S. Yang, Y. Wang, Chem 2019, 5, 1521-1536.
a) E. M. Karp, T. R. Eaton, V. S. i Nogué, V. Vorotnikov, M. J. Biddy, E.
C. Tan, D. G. Brandner, R. M. Cywar, R. Liu, L. P. Manker, W. E.
Michener, M. Gilhespy, Z. Skoufa, M. J. Watson, O. S. Fruchey, D. R.
Vardon, R. T. Gill, A. D. Bratis, G. T. Beckham, Science 2017, 358,
1307-1310; b) G. Liang, A. Wang, L. Li, G. Xu, N. Yan, T. Zhang,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3050-3054; c) M. Pelckmans, W.
Vermandel, F. Van Waes, K. Moonen, B. F. Sels, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 14540-14544; d) W. Deng, Y. Wang, S. Zhang, K. M. Gupta,
M. J. Hülsey, H. Asakura, L. Liu, Y. Han, E. M. Karp, G. T. Beckham, P.
J. Dyson, J. Jiang, T. Tanaka, Y. Wang, N. Yan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
2018, 115, 5093-5098; e) I. Scodeller, S. Mansouri, D. Morvan, E.
Muller, K. de Oliveira Vigier, R. Wischert, F. Jérôme, Angew. Chem. Int.
Figure 4. Kinetic resolution of DL-proline. a) The schematic
drawing of consuming L-proline from DL-proline in wild-type E.
coli BL21(DE3); b) DL-proline as substrate. The size of the error
bars (SE, n=2) is smaller than the symbol sizes. Experiments
were performed as descirbed in Section 1.5 in SI.
[2]
We further demonstrated the integration of chemical and
biological steps. The isolated DL-proline from pyrrole-2-
carboxylic acid hydrogenation was used in the biological step to
produce D-proline. After 48 h, L-proline was depleted while no
D-proline was consumed, highlighting chemical and biological
transformations established in this study can be seamlessly
combined. (Figure S12).
If the production of L-proline is desired, D-proline can be
converted into L-proline via an imino acid by simultaneously
using a proline oxidase that only accepts D-proline as the
substrate, and sodium cyanoborohydride which reduces the
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.