competition experiments. Equimolar mixtures of, e.g., 2c and
d were treated with 4-10 mol % of 1 in CDCl at room
competition with 2b; indeed, the ether was inert even when
) with 1. Thus, the completely
substituted allylic carbon in 2e is sufficient to inhibit
alkylidene formation. The lack of reaction within 2e also
supports the assertion that all RCM events in 2a-2d are
initiated at the monosubstituted alkene.
2
3
heated (∼65 °C, CDCl
3
temperature. Reaction progress was monitored directly by
1
H NMR spectroscopy. In no case were any intermediate
alkylidene species detected, implying that the rate-limiting
event in the reaction of each substrate was the metal
exchange reaction between an external ruthenium alkylidene
To rule out the possibility that the reactivity difference
between 2b and 2e was primarily steric in nature, we
competed linalool (2b) with citronellene (2c) in which the
(either benzylidene or isopropylidene) and the terminal vinyl
group in 2. The results of the various pairwise competition
experiments are indicated in Figure 1 and are summarized
by the approximate relative reactivity values listed to the
left of each structure.
7
latter clearly has a less hindered vinyl group. Nonethe-
less, the tertiary alcohol 2b reacted faster than 2c, again
confirming the hydroxyl activating effect. There are several
possible reasons for the large activating effect of the hydroxy
group. For example, rapid and reversible ligand exchange
at the ruthenium center of alkoxy for chloride [to give a
species such as (RO)Cl(Cy
phosphine [to give species such as either Cl
ROH)RudCHR′ or the anionic complex [Cl (Cy
PH] ] could promote reaction by preasso-
3
P)
2
RudCHR′] or of alcohol for
(Cy P)-
P)(RO)-
2
3
(
2
3
-
+
RudCHR′] [Cy
3
ciation. Similarly, hydrogen bonding between the hydroxy
group and one of the chloride ligands could be the event
that favors subsequent reaction between the alkene (in R)
and carbene centers.
The outcome of the previously mentioned competition
between 2c and 2d suggests that the inductive effect of the
allylic ether reduces the reaction rate of the adjacent, less
electron-rich alkene by nearly an order of magnitude.
Finally, we studied the RCM reaction of the secondary
8
alcohol 2a. As we recently noted in a different context, an
unexpected reaction pathway was uncovered. Namely, in
addition to the ring-closed cyclopent-2-en-1-ol (3a), the
methyl ketone 4 was formed in a 1:1.5 ratio (Scheme 1). It
Scheme 1
Figure 1. Results of RCM competition reactions between equi-
molar amounts (∼0.02 M in each diene) of the bracketed pairs of
substrates in CDCl at room temperature in the presence of 4-10
3
mol % of 1. #x represents the product ratio (determined by
1
integration of appropriate H NMR resonances) at the percent
conversion of the more reactive substrate (as indicated in paren-
theses). In experiments involving the secondary alcohol 2a, 90-
100 mol % of 1 was used since carbene species are consumed by
competitive methyl ketone formation (see text). There is a consider-
able error bar in the measurement marked b, since only a small
amount of the cyclopent-2-en-1-ol methyl ether (3d) was present
even at high conversion of 2a.
is clear that ruthenium carbene species are being consumed
by this side reaction, since use of only 10 mol % of 1 results
1
in low conversion of 2a and all H NMR resonances due to
8
One early competition experiment convincingly demon-
strated the fact that the allylic free hydroxyl group in linalool
1 disappear. We suggest that the initial carbene 5 undergoes
tautomerization to the enolyl ruthenium hydride species 6,
which can further undergo reductive elimination, either
before or after tautomerization to the oxoalkyl ruthenium
(2b) has a significant activating effect on the reaction rate.
Namely, linalool methyl ether (2e) was unreactive in
1124
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 7, 1999