J. M. D. Storey, C. Williamson / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 7337–7339
7339
tuted aromatic aldehydes (Table 1). In most cases, the
reaction times were short, with moderate to good yields,
which follow the previously observed trend of electron-
deficient aldehydes reacting more rapidly than electron-
rich aldehydes in benzoin condensation reactions.
Regeneration of the catalyst after each cycle was also
possible simply by treatment with acid. This was demon-
strated using catalyst 4, which was used in three succes-
sive benzoin condensations, albeit with approximately
10% lower yield in each cycle. We believe that this is
the first reported re-use of an imidazole based catalyst
in benzoin reactions.
Entry i clearly shows that less than 0.1 mol % of catalyst
is needed for reasonable conversion to the benzoin prod-
uct after just 30 min.
In summary, the first polymer-supported imidazolium
salt pre-catalysts have been reported and their utility
for the benzoin reaction has been demonstrated. More-
over, these catalysts are easy to handle, can be used at
lower catalyst loading than previously reported non-
polymer-supported catalysts, reaction times are cut from
many hours or days to minutes, and they can be regen-
erated for re-use.
Solvent effects were briefly investigated (entries g, n and
o). THF proved to be a far superior solvent with respect
to the rate of benzoin formation of those tested. The rela-
tive swelling of polystyrene could explain this, since
methanol and acetonitrile do not swell the polystyrene
to the same degree as THF.13 Greater swelling assists
diffusion of reactants and products to and from the
active sites within the beads.14
Acknowledgments
Since diffusion is a relevant factor in solid-phase cataly-
sis, the limit of the catalysts with regard to substrate size
was also investigated. 2-Naphthaldehyde 1e was rapidly
coupled in moderate yield (entry m), thus indicating sub-
strates are not limited to monocyclic aldehydes.
We gratefully thank EPSRC for financial support. In
addition, we would like to thank the EPSRC National
Mass Spectrometry Centre at the University of Wales,
Swansea, for providing accurate mass measurements.
References and notes
Variation of the base required for formation of the car-
bene was also investigated. As previously described,9
excess aqueous NaOH is effective in deprotonating imi-
dazolium salts, however NaOH has a tendency to cause
the benzoins formed in the reaction to precipitate as
their sodium salts, which solidifies the reaction medium
and tends to retard any further reaction. Triethylamine
is a commonly employed base for benzoin reactions,
but was shown to be completely inactive in this case.
The 1H NMR spectrum of structurally similar, non-teth-
ered salt 6 (Scheme 2) in the presence of excess triethyl-
amine, showed no evidence of C2 deprotonation after a
prolonged time, even at temperatures close to that of
refluxing THF, confirming that Et3N is insufficiently
basic to initiate this reaction.
1. Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1326–1328.
2. Stetter, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 639–712.
3. Grasa, G. A.; Kissling, R. A.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 3583–3586.
4. Sohn, S. S.; Rosen, E. L.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 14370–14371; Burstein, C.; Glorius, F. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6205–6208.
5. Studinger, H. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1913, 46, 3535–3538;
Ide, W. S.; Buck, J. S. Org. React. 1948, 4, 269–304.
6. Enders, D.; Kallfass, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
1743–1745; Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Kallfass, U.; Balen-
siefer, T. Synthesis 2003, 8, 1292–1295.
7. Knight, R. L.; Leeper, F. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
3611–3614; Dvorak, C. A.; Rawal, V. H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 2925–2928; Knight, R. L.; Leeper, F. J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1891–1893.
A similar NMR experiment using sodium hydride as
base showed, as expected, that deprotonation occurred
rapidly at room temperature. It was found that using
stoichiometric NaH (1 equiv per equivalent of active
catalytic site) in a catalytic reaction produced similar
yields of benzoin to reactions conducted using NaOH
as the base, and the benzoin formed remained in solu-
tion (entry q).
8. Lappert, M. F.; Maskell, R. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1982, 580–581.
9. Gao, G.; Xiao, R.; Yuan, Y.; Zhou, C.; You, J.; Xie, R. J.
Chem. Res. (S) 2002, 262–263; Orlandi, S.; Caporale, M.;
Benaglia, M.; Annunziata, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 3827–3830.
10. Ohnishi, H.; Kozaki, M.; Okada, K. Synth. Met. 2003,
135, 85–86; Faghihi, K.; Zamani, K.; Mallakpour, S. Iran.
Polym. J. 2002, 11, 339–347; Tarasolli, A.; Shushizadeh,
M. R. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2003, 178,
803–809.
11. Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
4283–4285; Demir, A. S.; Reis, O. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
3803–3811.
Entry r indicates that the polymer is not responsible for
the catalytic activity, since as expected none of the ben-
zoin product was produced during this reaction, and
starting material was recovered in near quantitative yield.
12. Nieczypor, P.; Buchowicz, W.; Meester, W.; Rutjes, F.;
Mol, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7103–7105; Nguyen, S.
T.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 497, 195–
200; Ahmed, M.; Barrett, A. G. M.; Braddock, D. C.;
Cramp, S. M.; Procopiou, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 8657–8662.
13. Keifer, P. A.; Baltusis, L.; Rice, D. M.; Tymiak, A. A.;
Shoolery, J. N. J. Magn. Reson., Ser. A 1996, 119, 65–75.
14. Guillier, F.; Orain, D.; Bradley, M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100,
2091–2157.
Ph
Ph
Ph
Br
N
N
N
N
Et3N
N
N
NaH
6
Scheme 2.