C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 4. (a) ON/OFF current ratio and effect of operation time and (b)
read pulses on the device in the OFF state and ON state. The inset in (b)
shows the pulses used for the measurements.
Figure 3. Molecular orbitals (left) of the basic unit of TP6F-PI and the
transitions (right) from the ground state to the CT state induced by the
electric field.
4
for the first 0.5 h, an ON/OFF current ratio of ∼10 was maintained
during the long-term testing under ambient conditions. No obvious
degradation in J was observed for the ON and OFF states after
more than 10 read cycles at a read voltage of 1 V (Figure 4(b)).
Thus, both states were stable under the voltage stress and were
insensitive to read pulses.
was proportional to the device area, that is, J was independent of
this parameter. This ability to write, read, erase, and refresh the
electrical states fulfils the functionality of a DRAM.
The mechanism of field-induced conductivity is probably similar
to that of the photoinduced CT in photoconductive PIs.14 The
incorporation of Ds has been known to enhance the photocurrent
in PI by several orders of magnitude, arising from the improved
CT complex formation in the PI backbone.15 In the present TP6F-
PI, triphenylamine acts as a D, while phthalimide acts as an A to
promote the CT complex formation. Molecular simulation of the
basic unit of TP6F-PI was carried out at the DFT B3LYP/6-31G(d)
level with the Gaussian 03 program package.16 Figure 3 shows the
resulting HOMO and LUMOs, and the plausible electronic pro-
cesses. The calculated energy levels are comparable to the HOMO
8
In summary, a plastic DRAM, based on a donor-functionalized
5
PI (TP6F-PI), exhibited an ON/OFF current ratio up to 10 . Both
the ON and OFF states were stable under a constant voltage stress
8
of 1 V and survived up to 10 read cycles at 1 V. A PI memory
device distinguishes itself from other polymer devices by its superior
thermal and chemical properties, while still possessing good
processability and scalability.
Supporting Information Available: Details on polymer synthesis
and characterization, molecular simulation, device fabrication, and ref
1
6. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
(-5.13 eV) and LUMO2 (-2.03 eV) energy levels of TP6F-PI,
pubs.acs.org.
measured by cyclic voltammetry (see Supporting Information). The
HOMO is located on D, while the first and second LUMOs are
located on A. At the threshold voltage, one of the electrons transits
from the HOMO to the LUMO3 within D to form an excited state.
Excitation of D leads to a decrease in ionization potential and
consequently promotes intra- or intermolecular CT at the excited
state. CT can occur indirectly from the LUMO3 of D to the
LUMO2, then to the LUMO of A, or directly from the HOMO to
the LUMO2 and LUMO at the excited state, to form a conductive
complex. These processes are supported by the electronic absorption
spectrum of TP6F-PI. The respective absorption maximum and
absorption edge at ∼290 nm (4.28 eV) and ∼400 nm (3.10 eV)
correspond to the HOMO f LUMO3 (4.60 eV, highest probability)
and HOMO f LUMO2 (2.96 eV, low probability) transitions (see
Supporting Information). The charges can be further segregated
under an electric field and delocalized to the conjugated triphen-
ylamine, thus stabilizing the CT state to some extent. However,
the ON state of TP6F-PI could not be sustained due to limited
delocalization in the triphenylamine moieties. A reverse bias of
about -2.1 V, or removal of the electric field, can dissociate the
CT complex and return the device to the initial OFF state.
References
(
1) Meador, M. A. Annu. ReV. Mater. Sci. 1998, 28, 599-630.
(2) Mal’tsev, E. I.; Brusentseva, M. A.; Lypenko, D. A.; Berendyaev, V. I.;
Kolesnikov, V. A.; Kotov, B. V.; Vannikov, A. V. Polym. AdV. Technol.
2000, 11, 325-329.
(3) Muhlbacher, D.; Brabec, C. J.; Sariciftci, N. S.; Kotov, B. V.; Berendyaev,
V. I.; Rumyantsev, B. M.; Hummelen, J. C. Synth. Met. 2001, 121, 1609-
1610.
(4) Wang, Z. Y.; Qi, Y.; Cao, J. P.; Sacripante, G. C.; Sundararajan, P. R.;
Duff, J. D. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 2075-2079.
(5) Stikeman, A. Technol. ReV. 2002, 105, 31-31.
(6) Bandyopadhyay, A.; Pal, A. J. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 1949-1952.
7) Moller, S.; Perlov, C.; Jackson, W.; Taussig, C.; Forrest, S. R. Nature
003, 426, 166-169.
(8) Chu, C. W.; Ouyang, J.; Tseng, J. H.; Yang, Y. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17,
440-1443.
(
2
1
(
9) Taylor, D. M.; Mills, C. A. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90, 306-309.
(10) Vorotyntsev, M. A.; Skompska, M.; Pousson, E.; Goux, J.; Moise, C. J.
Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 552, 307-317.
(
11) (a) Ling, Q. D.; Song, Y.; Ding, S. J.; Zhu, C. X.; Chan, D. S. H.; Kwong,
D. L.; Kang, E. T.; Neoh, K. G. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 455-459. (b)
Song, Y.; Ling, Q. D.; Zhu, C. X.; Kang, E. T.; Chan, D. S. H.; Wang,
Y. H.; Kwong, D. L. IEEE Electron DeVice Lett. 2006, 27 (3), 154-156.
(c) Ling, Q. D.; Song, Y.; Lim, S. L.; Teo, E. Y. H.; Tan, Y. P.; Zhu, C.
X.; Chan, D. S. H.; Kwong, D. L.; Kang, E. T.; Neoh, K. G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2947-2951.
(
12) Pinnow, C. U.; Mikolajick, T. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151 (6), K13-
K19.
(
13) Cheng, S. H.; Hsiao, S. H.; Su, T. H.; Liou, G. S. Macromolecules 2005,
Figure 4(a) shows the dependence of ON/OFF current ratio on
38, 307-316.
V and the stability of the device. An ON/OFF current ratio up to
(14) Tokita, Y.; Ino, Y.; Okamoto, A.; Hasegawa, M.; Shindo, Y.; Sugimura,
5
T. Jpn. Polym. Sci. Technol. 1994, 51, 245-250.
1
0 (which increases slightly due to the increase in ON-state current
(
15) Freilich, S. C. Macromolecules 1987, 20, 973-978.
with bias) promises minimal misreading error. At a constant stress
of 1 V, no obvious change in J for the OFF state was observed.
Although a slight degradation in J for the ON state was observed
(16) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, Revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.:
Wallingford, CT, 2004.
JA062489N
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 128, NO. 27, 2006 8733