Dalton Transactions
Communication
proceeded smoothly with an excellent product yield of 97% derivatives with nitroalkanes, which is superior to the copper(II)
(Table 1, entry 1). For comparison, CuCl2 and Cu(OAc)2 were chloride and copper(II) acetate salts.
used as control catalysts to conduct the catalytic experiments.
This work was financially supported by the National NSF of
As shown in Table 1, their catalytic efficiency is inferior to that China (grant no. 21373180), the Fundamental Research Funds
of 1 under identical conditions (entries 2 and 3). These results for the Central Universities (2014FZA3006) and Zhejiang Provin-
demonstrate that the very high catalytic activity of 1 on CDC cial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. Z4100038).
reaction should be due to its porous structure that makes
the substrates have more chance to access the catalytic
metal centers in the pore surfaces. Compound 1 can promote
Notes and references
a range of oxidative coupling reactions. The CDC reaction
between 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives and
nitroalkanes proceeded smoothly with good to excellent
‡Synthesis of [Cu2L(H2O)]·2Cl·2DMF·4H2O (1). CuCl2·2H2O (10 mg, 0.06 mmol),
H2L (10 mg, 0.04 mmol) and 0.6 mL aqueous HCl (0.1 M) were dissolved in DMF
product yields (Table 1, entries 4–10). The slightly lowered
yields should be attributed to the steric hindrance and elec-
tronic effects. Moreover, the catalytic efficiency of 1 is superior
to that of the well-known HKUST-1 with Cu2(COO)4(H2O)2
paddle-wheel SBUs (Table 1, entries 11–13), which suggests
that the synergistic effect of multiple factors should also play
an important role.9
To prove that the catalysis chiefly occurs inside the pores of
1, we have monitored the accessibility of the open channels of
1 to both the reactant and product molecules by UV-Vis
absorption spectroscopy. The UV-Vis spectra clearly indicate
that the pores of 1 are accessible to both 2-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetra-
hydroisoquinoline substrate and 1-(nitromethyl)-2-phenyl-
1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline product molecules with the
uptakes of 9.6 and 10.7 wt%, respectively. Moreover, after the
reaction proceeded for 2 h, the catalytic reaction was intention-
(10 mL) at room temperature. The mixture was sealed in a screw cap vial and
heated at 80 °C for 2 days. Blue crystals of 1 were collected by filtration, washed
with DMF and acetone, and dried at room temperature. Yield: 18 mg (67% based
on Cu). Anal. Calcd for C28H36Cu2N6O15Cl2 (%): C, 37.59; H, 4.06; N 9.39. Found
(%): C, 37.05; H, 4.21; N, 9.47. FTIR (KBr pellet): ν/cm−1 = 1667(m), 1620(m),
1586(s), 1504(m), 1457(m), 1407(m), 1360(s), 1250(m), 1168(m), 1106(m),
1065(s), 949(m), 790(s), 730(s), 662(m).
§Crystal data for compound 1: C22H14Cu2N4O9, Mr = 605.45, monoclinic, space
group C2/m, a = 17.2044(9) Å, b = 25.9374(14) Å, c = 14.6116(8) Å, β = 100.672(6)°,
V
=
6407.5(6) Å3,
Z
=
4,
T = 293 K, Rint = 0.0553, Dc = 0.628 g ,
cm−3
μ = 1.021 mm−1, F(000) = 1216, R1 = 0.0881, wR2 = 0.2086, and S = 1.048.
¶A typical procedure for the CDC reaction. A mixture of 1 (0.01 mmol), 2-phenyl-
1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (21 mg, 0.1 mmol), TBHP (18 μL, 0.15 mmol),
and CH3NO2 (1 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. After the reaction
was complete, the solid catalyst was recovered by centrifugation and washed
with acetone. The combined plasma was evaporated under reduced pressure.
The residue was subjected to chromatography on silica gel with hexane–ethyl
acetate (10/1) as an eluent to isolate the product.
ally interrupted, and the solid catalyst was collected by 1 C. S. Yeung and V. M. Dong, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 1215.
1
centrifugation. The integration of the H NMR signals for the 2 (a) Z. Li and C.-J. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 3672;
digested sample has revealed that about 1.0 substrate and 1.1
product molecules per formula unit were embedded in the
pores of the used catalyst, which demonstrate that the catalytic
reaction does take place inside the pores.
(b) C.-J. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 335; (c) E. Boess,
C. Schmitz and M. Klussmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,
5317; (d) J. Xie, H. Li, J. Zhou, Y. Cheng and C. Zhu, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 1252; (e) Z. Li, D. S. Bohle and
C.-J. Li, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 8928.
After a mixture of 1 and TBHP in nitromethane was stirred
at room temperature for 6 h, the mixture was filtered. 3 (a) X.-Z. Shu, X.-F. Xia, Y.-F. Yang, K.-G. Ji, X.-Y. Liu and
2-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline and additional TBHP
were subsequently added to the supernatant, which was
further stirred at room temperature for another 6 h. The
Y.-M. Liang, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 7464; (b) X.-L. Yang,
C. Zou, Y. He, M. Zhao, B. Chen, S. Xiang, M. O’Keeffe and
C.-D. Wu, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 1447.
product yield is identical to that of the background reaction. 4 (a) M. P. Suh, H. J. Park, T. K. Prasad and D.-W. Lim, Chem.
Moreover, after the reaction proceeded for 2 h, the solid cata-
lyst was removed by centrifugation. The plasma together with
additional TBHP was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The
product yield obviously did not increase under the same con-
ditions. The above results unambiguously proved that the CDC
catalysis by 1 is heterogeneous in nature. The PXRD pattern of
the recovered solid suggests that the structural integrity of the
catalyst was maintained during catalysis. Furthermore, catalyst 1
can be simply recovered by centrifugation, thoroughly washed
with acetone, and subsequently used in successive runs for six
cycles without loss of catalytic efficiency (Table 1, entry 14).
In summary, we have employed an imidazole carboxylate
ligand to connect with CuII nodes to construct a novel 3D
porous MOF 1 that contains coordinatively unsaturated copper
sites in the opening channel walls. Compound 1 efficiently
prompts the CDC reaction of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline
Rev., 2012, 112, 782; (b) K. Sumida, D. L. Rogow, J. A. Mason,
T. M. McDonald, E. D. Bloch, Z. R. Herm, T.-H. Bae and
J. R. Long, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 724; (c) J.-R. Li, J. Sculley
and H.-C. Zhou, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 869; (d) E. Coronado
and G. Minguez Espallargas, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 1525;
(e) P. Horcajada, R. Gref, T. Baati, P. K. Allan, G. Maurin,
P. Couvreur, G. Férey, R. E. Morris and C. Serre, Chem. Rev.,
2012, 112, 1232; (f) Z. Hu, B. J. Deibert and J. Li, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2014, 43, 5815; (g) Q.-L. Zhu and Q. Xu, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2014, 43, 5468; (h) Y. Cui, Y. Yue, G. Qian and B. Chen,
Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1126; (i) L. E. Kreno, K. Leong,
O. K. Farha, M. Allendorf, R. P. Van Duyne and J. T. Hupp,
Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1105; ( j) M. Yoon, R. Srirambalaji
and K. Kim, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1196; (k) H. R. Moon,
D.-W. Lim and M. P. Suh, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 1807;
(l) J. Liu, L. Chen, H. Cui, J. Zhang, L. Zhang and C.-Y. Su,
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Dalton Trans.