24
P. Xu et al. / Catalysis Communications 86 (2016) 23–26
9012-76-4). CS@Cu(OH)2, CS@CuO [24] and other CS@Cu catalysts [21]
were prepared following the procedures reported.
intervals until the resulting solution was clear. After the solution was
cooled to room temperature, 1 mL of aqua regia was added carefully.
Effervescence of gas was observed and the solution becomes clearer.
The solution was then transferred to a volumetric flask and made up
to 50 mL with water which was submitted for ICP analysis.
2.2. Analytical methods
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 500
or 600 MHz spectrometers at ambient temperature. Data for 1H NMR
are reported as follows: chemical shift (ppm, scale), multiplicity (s =
singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet and/or mul-
tiplet resonances, br = broad), coupling constant (Hz), and integration.
Data for 13C NMR are reported in terms of chemical shift (ppm, scale),
multiplicity, and coupling constant (Hz). Flash column chromatographic
purification of products was accomplished using forced-flow chroma-
tography on Silica Gel (200–300 mesh). High Resolution Mass Spectra
(HRMS) were recorded using a JEOL JMS-700 spectrometer. The weight
percentage and metal leaching of copper were determined by induc-
tively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analy-
sis. The copper loading of CS@Cu(OH)2 was found to be 1.50 mmol/g.
Procedure for the preparation of sample for ICP analysis to deter-
mine the catalyst loading: Catalyst (~20 mg) was placed in a clean test
tube and heated with H2SO4 (1 mL) at 200 °C. After 30 min, several
drops of concentrated HNO3 were added carefully and the tube was
shaken occasionally. HNO3 was continuously added until a clear
solution was obtained and excess amount of HNO3 was allowed to evap-
orate under heating. After the solution was cooled to room temperature,
1 mL of aqua regia was added carefully. Effervescence of gas was ob-
served and the solution becomes clearer. The solution was then trans-
ferred to a volumetric flask and made up to 50 mL with water which
was submitted for ICP analysis.
2.3. General procedure for CS@Cu catalyzed borylation of α,β-unsaturated
acceptors in water
CS@Cu(OH)2 (6.7 mg, 5 mol% Cu loading) and L4 (2.4 mg, 6 mol%)
were mixed in water (2 mL). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at room
temperature, followed by successive addition of chalcone 1a (41.0 mg,
0.2 mmol) and B2(pin)2 (60.9 mg, 0.24 mmol). After stirring for 12 h
at room temperature, the reaction mixture was filtered and washed
with THF (3 mL). Excess amount of NaBO3·4H2O (244 mg) was then
added to filtrate and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for
4 h. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (20 mL) three times,
and the combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.
After concentrated under reduced pressure, the crude mixture was pu-
rified by preparative TLC (nhexane/EtOAc = 4/1) to afford the desired
product 3a (45.3 mg, quant.).
3. Results and discussion
We conducted the reaction of bis(pinacolato)diboron (B2(pin)2)
with chalcone 1a in water by using Cu(OH)2 as catalyst, 2,2′-bipyridine
ligand L1 as additive. The desired 1,4-addition product 2a was obtained
in 93% yield with 1.6% leaching (Table 1, entry 1). Since Cu(OH)2 is al-
most insoluble in water, metal leaching could probably be ascribed to
the generation of pinBOH by-product [12] during the reaction process.
Based on the catalytic cycle [11], stoichiometric amount of pinBOH
was generated as by-product which presumably might be absorbed on
the surface of CS@Cu catalyst and caused the metal leaching. When
we tried to immobilize Cu(OH)2 on series of different supports, the
yield decreased in all cases (Table 1, entries 2–4). However, chitosan
(CS) could give comparable results with non-immobilized Cu(OH)2
(Table 1, entry 5). To be mentioned, this reaction could also proceed
Procedure for the preparation of ICP analysis to determine the metal
leaching: After the reaction was finished, the reaction mixture was fil-
tered. The filtrate obtained was concentrated and diluted with 10 mL
of THF. Then 50% v/v of the crude THF solution (5 mL) was then passed
through a membrane filter (0.25 or 0.45 μm) into a clean test tube. After
evaporation of solvent, the solid obtained in the test tube was heated to
200 °C and 1.0 mL of concentrated H2SO4 was added. Following similar
procedure described above, concentrated HNO3 were added at regular
Table 1
Optimization of reaction conditionsa.
Entry
Metal salts
Support
Ligand
Yield (%)b
Leaching (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
CuCN
CuSO4
CuCl2
CuF2
CuBr2
–
TiO2
Fe3O4
SiO2
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
–
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L2
L3
L4
93
64
52
69
90
47
NR
46
37
71
39
17
83
91
Quant.
1.6
0.7
16.5
1.2
0.7
1.1
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
Chitosan
No leachingd
65.7
59.0
25.6
72.1
3.9
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CuO
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
Cu(OH)2
1.4
No leachingd
No leachingd
a
Reaction conditions: substrate 1 (0.2 mmol), B2(pin)2 (1.2 equiv), Support@Cu (5 mol% Cu loading), L (6 mol%), H2O (2 mL), rt, 12 h.
Isolated yield.
Determined by ICP analysis.
Under detection limit.
b
c
d